Types of touch in cross-sex relationships between coworkers

Perceptions of relational and emotional messages, inappropriateness, and sexual harassment

Josephine W. Lee, Laura Guerrero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined observers' perceptions of nine different types of touch (including a "no touch" control condition) used in cross-sex relationships between coworkers. Results showed that face touch sends particularly strong relational and emotional messages. A soft touch in the cheek area of the face was seen as signaling more affection, attraction, flirtation, and love than the other types of touch. Face touch was also rated as the most inappropriate and sexually harassing of the nine types of touch examined. Arm around the waist was also rated as showing relatively high levels of attraction and flirtation, as well as inappropriateness and harassment. No touch and handshaking conveyed the most formality. Observers rated women as more affectionate, trusting, happy, and composed than men across the touch conditions. Men, however, were judged to be more attracted to their cross-sex partners than were women. These and other findings are discussed to shed light on the multiple interpretations of touch within the context of relationships between cross-sex coworkers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-220
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Applied Communication Research
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2001

Fingerprint

sexual harassment
co-worker
sympathy
love
interpretation
Sexual Harassment
Emotion
Observer
Attraction

Keywords

  • Coworker relationships
  • Cross-sex relationships
  • Emotion
  • Sexual harassment
  • Touch

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Communication

Cite this

@article{5e044cd1afe947e9a2ceba3d58931ae5,
title = "Types of touch in cross-sex relationships between coworkers: Perceptions of relational and emotional messages, inappropriateness, and sexual harassment",
abstract = "This study examined observers' perceptions of nine different types of touch (including a {"}no touch{"} control condition) used in cross-sex relationships between coworkers. Results showed that face touch sends particularly strong relational and emotional messages. A soft touch in the cheek area of the face was seen as signaling more affection, attraction, flirtation, and love than the other types of touch. Face touch was also rated as the most inappropriate and sexually harassing of the nine types of touch examined. Arm around the waist was also rated as showing relatively high levels of attraction and flirtation, as well as inappropriateness and harassment. No touch and handshaking conveyed the most formality. Observers rated women as more affectionate, trusting, happy, and composed than men across the touch conditions. Men, however, were judged to be more attracted to their cross-sex partners than were women. These and other findings are discussed to shed light on the multiple interpretations of touch within the context of relationships between cross-sex coworkers.",
keywords = "Coworker relationships, Cross-sex relationships, Emotion, Sexual harassment, Touch",
author = "Lee, {Josephine W.} and Laura Guerrero",
year = "2001",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1080/00909880128110",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "197--220",
journal = "Journal of Applied Communication Research",
issn = "0090-9882",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Types of touch in cross-sex relationships between coworkers

T2 - Perceptions of relational and emotional messages, inappropriateness, and sexual harassment

AU - Lee, Josephine W.

AU - Guerrero, Laura

PY - 2001/8

Y1 - 2001/8

N2 - This study examined observers' perceptions of nine different types of touch (including a "no touch" control condition) used in cross-sex relationships between coworkers. Results showed that face touch sends particularly strong relational and emotional messages. A soft touch in the cheek area of the face was seen as signaling more affection, attraction, flirtation, and love than the other types of touch. Face touch was also rated as the most inappropriate and sexually harassing of the nine types of touch examined. Arm around the waist was also rated as showing relatively high levels of attraction and flirtation, as well as inappropriateness and harassment. No touch and handshaking conveyed the most formality. Observers rated women as more affectionate, trusting, happy, and composed than men across the touch conditions. Men, however, were judged to be more attracted to their cross-sex partners than were women. These and other findings are discussed to shed light on the multiple interpretations of touch within the context of relationships between cross-sex coworkers.

AB - This study examined observers' perceptions of nine different types of touch (including a "no touch" control condition) used in cross-sex relationships between coworkers. Results showed that face touch sends particularly strong relational and emotional messages. A soft touch in the cheek area of the face was seen as signaling more affection, attraction, flirtation, and love than the other types of touch. Face touch was also rated as the most inappropriate and sexually harassing of the nine types of touch examined. Arm around the waist was also rated as showing relatively high levels of attraction and flirtation, as well as inappropriateness and harassment. No touch and handshaking conveyed the most formality. Observers rated women as more affectionate, trusting, happy, and composed than men across the touch conditions. Men, however, were judged to be more attracted to their cross-sex partners than were women. These and other findings are discussed to shed light on the multiple interpretations of touch within the context of relationships between cross-sex coworkers.

KW - Coworker relationships

KW - Cross-sex relationships

KW - Emotion

KW - Sexual harassment

KW - Touch

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035633279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035633279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00909880128110

DO - 10.1080/00909880128110

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 197

EP - 220

JO - Journal of Applied Communication Research

JF - Journal of Applied Communication Research

SN - 0090-9882

IS - 3

ER -