Two-year impact of a universal social-emotional learning curriculum: Group differences from developmentally sensitive trends over time

Sabina Low, Keith Smolkowski, Clayton Cook, Danielle Desfosses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the impact of a commonly adopted elementary universal social-emotional learning program, Second Step, on student social-emotional and academic outcomes following 2 years of implementation. The cluster-randomized wait-list control trial included 61 schools, 321 teachers, and 8,941 early elementary students across 2 states, with assessments collected in the fall and spring across 2 years. We developed 8 theoretically derived growth patterns that potentially described the intervention and counterfactual conditions, and then selected the model with the greatest support from the data for each outcome with an information-theoretic approach. Differences between intervention and control groups were tested within the best-fitting model in order to reduce misspecification and maximize generalizability. Most measures fit a pattern in which students improved only during instructional time in school and not during the summer; the data rarely fit the commonly assumed linear growth model. Improvements related to Second Step were observed for emotional symptoms, hyperactivity, skills for learning, and emotion management, but these were modified by either pretest levels or student sex. Condition effects for peer problems were larger for students with initially low ratings and for boys. Boys also showed improvements in conduct problems. Study impacts generally did not depend upon student grade level. The results confirmed the importance of identifying developmentally sensitive trajectories and suggested important implications for Second Step implementation in early elementary grades.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)415-433
Number of pages19
JournalDevelopmental psychology
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Learning
Students
curriculum
trend
learning
Group
student
school grade
Growth
school
time
Linear Models
Emotions
emotion
rating
Control Groups
teacher
management

Keywords

  • Developmental trajectories
  • School-based intervention
  • Social-emotional learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Two-year impact of a universal social-emotional learning curriculum : Group differences from developmentally sensitive trends over time. / Low, Sabina; Smolkowski, Keith; Cook, Clayton; Desfosses, Danielle.

In: Developmental psychology, Vol. 55, No. 2, 01.02.2019, p. 415-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cfc7c5986b1a42078b61f9026d09c23e,
title = "Two-year impact of a universal social-emotional learning curriculum: Group differences from developmentally sensitive trends over time",
abstract = "This study examined the impact of a commonly adopted elementary universal social-emotional learning program, Second Step, on student social-emotional and academic outcomes following 2 years of implementation. The cluster-randomized wait-list control trial included 61 schools, 321 teachers, and 8,941 early elementary students across 2 states, with assessments collected in the fall and spring across 2 years. We developed 8 theoretically derived growth patterns that potentially described the intervention and counterfactual conditions, and then selected the model with the greatest support from the data for each outcome with an information-theoretic approach. Differences between intervention and control groups were tested within the best-fitting model in order to reduce misspecification and maximize generalizability. Most measures fit a pattern in which students improved only during instructional time in school and not during the summer; the data rarely fit the commonly assumed linear growth model. Improvements related to Second Step were observed for emotional symptoms, hyperactivity, skills for learning, and emotion management, but these were modified by either pretest levels or student sex. Condition effects for peer problems were larger for students with initially low ratings and for boys. Boys also showed improvements in conduct problems. Study impacts generally did not depend upon student grade level. The results confirmed the importance of identifying developmentally sensitive trajectories and suggested important implications for Second Step implementation in early elementary grades.",
keywords = "Developmental trajectories, School-based intervention, Social-emotional learning",
author = "Sabina Low and Keith Smolkowski and Clayton Cook and Danielle Desfosses",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/dev0000621",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "415--433",
journal = "Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0012-1649",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two-year impact of a universal social-emotional learning curriculum

T2 - Group differences from developmentally sensitive trends over time

AU - Low, Sabina

AU - Smolkowski, Keith

AU - Cook, Clayton

AU - Desfosses, Danielle

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - This study examined the impact of a commonly adopted elementary universal social-emotional learning program, Second Step, on student social-emotional and academic outcomes following 2 years of implementation. The cluster-randomized wait-list control trial included 61 schools, 321 teachers, and 8,941 early elementary students across 2 states, with assessments collected in the fall and spring across 2 years. We developed 8 theoretically derived growth patterns that potentially described the intervention and counterfactual conditions, and then selected the model with the greatest support from the data for each outcome with an information-theoretic approach. Differences between intervention and control groups were tested within the best-fitting model in order to reduce misspecification and maximize generalizability. Most measures fit a pattern in which students improved only during instructional time in school and not during the summer; the data rarely fit the commonly assumed linear growth model. Improvements related to Second Step were observed for emotional symptoms, hyperactivity, skills for learning, and emotion management, but these were modified by either pretest levels or student sex. Condition effects for peer problems were larger for students with initially low ratings and for boys. Boys also showed improvements in conduct problems. Study impacts generally did not depend upon student grade level. The results confirmed the importance of identifying developmentally sensitive trajectories and suggested important implications for Second Step implementation in early elementary grades.

AB - This study examined the impact of a commonly adopted elementary universal social-emotional learning program, Second Step, on student social-emotional and academic outcomes following 2 years of implementation. The cluster-randomized wait-list control trial included 61 schools, 321 teachers, and 8,941 early elementary students across 2 states, with assessments collected in the fall and spring across 2 years. We developed 8 theoretically derived growth patterns that potentially described the intervention and counterfactual conditions, and then selected the model with the greatest support from the data for each outcome with an information-theoretic approach. Differences between intervention and control groups were tested within the best-fitting model in order to reduce misspecification and maximize generalizability. Most measures fit a pattern in which students improved only during instructional time in school and not during the summer; the data rarely fit the commonly assumed linear growth model. Improvements related to Second Step were observed for emotional symptoms, hyperactivity, skills for learning, and emotion management, but these were modified by either pretest levels or student sex. Condition effects for peer problems were larger for students with initially low ratings and for boys. Boys also showed improvements in conduct problems. Study impacts generally did not depend upon student grade level. The results confirmed the importance of identifying developmentally sensitive trajectories and suggested important implications for Second Step implementation in early elementary grades.

KW - Developmental trajectories

KW - School-based intervention

KW - Social-emotional learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059262005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059262005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/dev0000621

DO - 10.1037/dev0000621

M3 - Article

C2 - 30589338

AN - SCOPUS:85059262005

VL - 55

SP - 415

EP - 433

JO - Developmental Psychology

JF - Developmental Psychology

SN - 0012-1649

IS - 2

ER -