Two-year bond strengths of "all-in-one" adhesives to dentine

Ricardo Walter, Edward J. Swift, Hiroko Nagaoka, Yunro Chung, Whitley Bartholomew, Krista M. Braswell, Patricia N R Pereira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To test the long-term in vitro bonding performance of "all-in-one" self-etch adhesives to dentine. Methods: Adper Prompt (3M ESPE), Bond Force (Tokuyama), Brush & Bond (Parkell), iBond Self Etch (Heraeus Kulzer), OptiBond All-In-One (Kerr), and Xeno IV (Dentsply Caulk) were tested. The two-step self-etch adhesive Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) served as the control. Extracted human teeth were assigned to groups after creation of smear layer on occlusal dentine. Adhesives were applied according to manufacturers' instructions, and resin composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE) build-ups were placed. The bonded specimens were sectioned into beams after 24 h of storage in water. Microtensile bond strengths (μTBS) was determined at baseline, and following one and two years of water storage using an EZ-Test device (Shimadzu). Representative specimens were examined under field emission scanning electron microscope. Fracture mode was recorded. The data were analyzed using linear mixed effects and least square means analyses. The significance level was set at 0.01 for the pairwise comparisons and at 0.05 for the overall model effects. Results: The mean μTBS decreased significantly over time for Adper Prompt, iBond Self Etch, and OptiBond All-In-One. After two years of water ageing, Bond Force, Brush & Bond, OptiBond All-In-One, and Xeno IV had mean μTBS values not statistically different from Clearfil SE Bond. Conclusions: After two years of water ageing, Clearfil SE Bond outperformed two of six all-in-one adhesives. That indicates that the composition of the adhesives rather than their application approach is accountable for their performance. Clinical significance: Despite the data available suggesting that most all-in-one adhesives are severely affected by hydrolytic degradation, results of the present in vitro study suggest that some may perform as well as the clinically proven Clearfil SE Bond in the longer term.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)549-555
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Dentistry
Volume40
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dentin
Adhesives
Water
Smear Layer
Least-Squares Analysis
Tooth
Electrons
Equipment and Supplies
Clearfil SE Bond
Optibond

Keywords

  • Adhesion
  • All-in-one
  • Bond strength
  • Bonding
  • Dental materials
  • Long-term

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Walter, R., Swift, E. J., Nagaoka, H., Chung, Y., Bartholomew, W., Braswell, K. M., & Pereira, P. N. R. (2012). Two-year bond strengths of "all-in-one" adhesives to dentine. Journal of Dentistry, 40(7), 549-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.003

Two-year bond strengths of "all-in-one" adhesives to dentine. / Walter, Ricardo; Swift, Edward J.; Nagaoka, Hiroko; Chung, Yunro; Bartholomew, Whitley; Braswell, Krista M.; Pereira, Patricia N R.

In: Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 40, No. 7, 01.07.2012, p. 549-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Walter, R, Swift, EJ, Nagaoka, H, Chung, Y, Bartholomew, W, Braswell, KM & Pereira, PNR 2012, 'Two-year bond strengths of "all-in-one" adhesives to dentine', Journal of Dentistry, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 549-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.003
Walter R, Swift EJ, Nagaoka H, Chung Y, Bartholomew W, Braswell KM et al. Two-year bond strengths of "all-in-one" adhesives to dentine. Journal of Dentistry. 2012 Jul 1;40(7):549-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.003
Walter, Ricardo ; Swift, Edward J. ; Nagaoka, Hiroko ; Chung, Yunro ; Bartholomew, Whitley ; Braswell, Krista M. ; Pereira, Patricia N R. / Two-year bond strengths of "all-in-one" adhesives to dentine. In: Journal of Dentistry. 2012 ; Vol. 40, No. 7. pp. 549-555.
@article{70d7dbacfc554aca92e57df9747357c2,
title = "Two-year bond strengths of {"}all-in-one{"} adhesives to dentine",
abstract = "Objectives: To test the long-term in vitro bonding performance of {"}all-in-one{"} self-etch adhesives to dentine. Methods: Adper Prompt (3M ESPE), Bond Force (Tokuyama), Brush & Bond (Parkell), iBond Self Etch (Heraeus Kulzer), OptiBond All-In-One (Kerr), and Xeno IV (Dentsply Caulk) were tested. The two-step self-etch adhesive Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) served as the control. Extracted human teeth were assigned to groups after creation of smear layer on occlusal dentine. Adhesives were applied according to manufacturers' instructions, and resin composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE) build-ups were placed. The bonded specimens were sectioned into beams after 24 h of storage in water. Microtensile bond strengths (μTBS) was determined at baseline, and following one and two years of water storage using an EZ-Test device (Shimadzu). Representative specimens were examined under field emission scanning electron microscope. Fracture mode was recorded. The data were analyzed using linear mixed effects and least square means analyses. The significance level was set at 0.01 for the pairwise comparisons and at 0.05 for the overall model effects. Results: The mean μTBS decreased significantly over time for Adper Prompt, iBond Self Etch, and OptiBond All-In-One. After two years of water ageing, Bond Force, Brush & Bond, OptiBond All-In-One, and Xeno IV had mean μTBS values not statistically different from Clearfil SE Bond. Conclusions: After two years of water ageing, Clearfil SE Bond outperformed two of six all-in-one adhesives. That indicates that the composition of the adhesives rather than their application approach is accountable for their performance. Clinical significance: Despite the data available suggesting that most all-in-one adhesives are severely affected by hydrolytic degradation, results of the present in vitro study suggest that some may perform as well as the clinically proven Clearfil SE Bond in the longer term.",
keywords = "Adhesion, All-in-one, Bond strength, Bonding, Dental materials, Long-term",
author = "Ricardo Walter and Swift, {Edward J.} and Hiroko Nagaoka and Yunro Chung and Whitley Bartholomew and Braswell, {Krista M.} and Pereira, {Patricia N R}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "549--555",
journal = "Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0300-5712",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two-year bond strengths of "all-in-one" adhesives to dentine

AU - Walter, Ricardo

AU - Swift, Edward J.

AU - Nagaoka, Hiroko

AU - Chung, Yunro

AU - Bartholomew, Whitley

AU - Braswell, Krista M.

AU - Pereira, Patricia N R

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - Objectives: To test the long-term in vitro bonding performance of "all-in-one" self-etch adhesives to dentine. Methods: Adper Prompt (3M ESPE), Bond Force (Tokuyama), Brush & Bond (Parkell), iBond Self Etch (Heraeus Kulzer), OptiBond All-In-One (Kerr), and Xeno IV (Dentsply Caulk) were tested. The two-step self-etch adhesive Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) served as the control. Extracted human teeth were assigned to groups after creation of smear layer on occlusal dentine. Adhesives were applied according to manufacturers' instructions, and resin composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE) build-ups were placed. The bonded specimens were sectioned into beams after 24 h of storage in water. Microtensile bond strengths (μTBS) was determined at baseline, and following one and two years of water storage using an EZ-Test device (Shimadzu). Representative specimens were examined under field emission scanning electron microscope. Fracture mode was recorded. The data were analyzed using linear mixed effects and least square means analyses. The significance level was set at 0.01 for the pairwise comparisons and at 0.05 for the overall model effects. Results: The mean μTBS decreased significantly over time for Adper Prompt, iBond Self Etch, and OptiBond All-In-One. After two years of water ageing, Bond Force, Brush & Bond, OptiBond All-In-One, and Xeno IV had mean μTBS values not statistically different from Clearfil SE Bond. Conclusions: After two years of water ageing, Clearfil SE Bond outperformed two of six all-in-one adhesives. That indicates that the composition of the adhesives rather than their application approach is accountable for their performance. Clinical significance: Despite the data available suggesting that most all-in-one adhesives are severely affected by hydrolytic degradation, results of the present in vitro study suggest that some may perform as well as the clinically proven Clearfil SE Bond in the longer term.

AB - Objectives: To test the long-term in vitro bonding performance of "all-in-one" self-etch adhesives to dentine. Methods: Adper Prompt (3M ESPE), Bond Force (Tokuyama), Brush & Bond (Parkell), iBond Self Etch (Heraeus Kulzer), OptiBond All-In-One (Kerr), and Xeno IV (Dentsply Caulk) were tested. The two-step self-etch adhesive Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) served as the control. Extracted human teeth were assigned to groups after creation of smear layer on occlusal dentine. Adhesives were applied according to manufacturers' instructions, and resin composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE) build-ups were placed. The bonded specimens were sectioned into beams after 24 h of storage in water. Microtensile bond strengths (μTBS) was determined at baseline, and following one and two years of water storage using an EZ-Test device (Shimadzu). Representative specimens were examined under field emission scanning electron microscope. Fracture mode was recorded. The data were analyzed using linear mixed effects and least square means analyses. The significance level was set at 0.01 for the pairwise comparisons and at 0.05 for the overall model effects. Results: The mean μTBS decreased significantly over time for Adper Prompt, iBond Self Etch, and OptiBond All-In-One. After two years of water ageing, Bond Force, Brush & Bond, OptiBond All-In-One, and Xeno IV had mean μTBS values not statistically different from Clearfil SE Bond. Conclusions: After two years of water ageing, Clearfil SE Bond outperformed two of six all-in-one adhesives. That indicates that the composition of the adhesives rather than their application approach is accountable for their performance. Clinical significance: Despite the data available suggesting that most all-in-one adhesives are severely affected by hydrolytic degradation, results of the present in vitro study suggest that some may perform as well as the clinically proven Clearfil SE Bond in the longer term.

KW - Adhesion

KW - All-in-one

KW - Bond strength

KW - Bonding

KW - Dental materials

KW - Long-term

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861815224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861815224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 22429926

AN - SCOPUS:84861815224

VL - 40

SP - 549

EP - 555

JO - Journal of Dentistry

JF - Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0300-5712

IS - 7

ER -