Two States in the Holy Land? International Recognition and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Nikola Mirilovic, David Siroky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How do states decide to extend or withhold international recognition in cases of contested sovereignty? We focus on how religion shapes the incentives of states in making this decision, both at the domestic level through religious institutions and at the international level through religious affinities. States with transnational religious ties to the contested territory are more likely to extend recognition. At the domestic level, states that heavily regulate religion are less likely to extend international recognition. We test these conjectures, and examine others in the literature, with two new data sets on the international recognition of both Palestine and Israel and voting on the United Nations resolution to admit Palestine as a non-member state observer, combined with global data on religious regulation and religious affinities. In cases of contested sovereignty, the results provide support for these two mechanisms through which religion shapes foreign policy decisions about international recognition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-285
Number of pages23
JournalPolitics and Religion
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 23 2015

Fingerprint

international recognition
Palestinian-Israeli conflict
Religion
Palestine
sovereignty
foreign policy
voting
UNO
Israel
incentive
decision making
regulation
Holy Land
International Recognition
Palestinians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Religious studies

Cite this

Two States in the Holy Land? International Recognition and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. / Mirilovic, Nikola; Siroky, David.

In: Politics and Religion, Vol. 8, No. 2, 23.06.2015, p. 263-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{71e3164e01054b119e2be1bc76216f41,
title = "Two States in the Holy Land?: International Recognition and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict",
abstract = "How do states decide to extend or withhold international recognition in cases of contested sovereignty? We focus on how religion shapes the incentives of states in making this decision, both at the domestic level through religious institutions and at the international level through religious affinities. States with transnational religious ties to the contested territory are more likely to extend recognition. At the domestic level, states that heavily regulate religion are less likely to extend international recognition. We test these conjectures, and examine others in the literature, with two new data sets on the international recognition of both Palestine and Israel and voting on the United Nations resolution to admit Palestine as a non-member state observer, combined with global data on religious regulation and religious affinities. In cases of contested sovereignty, the results provide support for these two mechanisms through which religion shapes foreign policy decisions about international recognition.",
author = "Nikola Mirilovic and David Siroky",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1017/S1755048315000164",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "263--285",
journal = "Politics and Religion",
issn = "1755-0483",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two States in the Holy Land?

T2 - International Recognition and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

AU - Mirilovic, Nikola

AU - Siroky, David

PY - 2015/6/23

Y1 - 2015/6/23

N2 - How do states decide to extend or withhold international recognition in cases of contested sovereignty? We focus on how religion shapes the incentives of states in making this decision, both at the domestic level through religious institutions and at the international level through religious affinities. States with transnational religious ties to the contested territory are more likely to extend recognition. At the domestic level, states that heavily regulate religion are less likely to extend international recognition. We test these conjectures, and examine others in the literature, with two new data sets on the international recognition of both Palestine and Israel and voting on the United Nations resolution to admit Palestine as a non-member state observer, combined with global data on religious regulation and religious affinities. In cases of contested sovereignty, the results provide support for these two mechanisms through which religion shapes foreign policy decisions about international recognition.

AB - How do states decide to extend or withhold international recognition in cases of contested sovereignty? We focus on how religion shapes the incentives of states in making this decision, both at the domestic level through religious institutions and at the international level through religious affinities. States with transnational religious ties to the contested territory are more likely to extend recognition. At the domestic level, states that heavily regulate religion are less likely to extend international recognition. We test these conjectures, and examine others in the literature, with two new data sets on the international recognition of both Palestine and Israel and voting on the United Nations resolution to admit Palestine as a non-member state observer, combined with global data on religious regulation and religious affinities. In cases of contested sovereignty, the results provide support for these two mechanisms through which religion shapes foreign policy decisions about international recognition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937717885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937717885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1755048315000164

DO - 10.1017/S1755048315000164

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84937717885

VL - 8

SP - 263

EP - 285

JO - Politics and Religion

JF - Politics and Religion

SN - 1755-0483

IS - 2

ER -