Two-Level Dynamic Structural Equation Models with Small Samples

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Advances in data collection have made intensive longitudinal data easier to collect, unlocking potential for methodological innovations to model such data. Dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM) is one such methodology but recent studies have suggested that its small N performance is poor. This is problematic because small N data are omnipresent in empirical applications due to logistical and financial concerns associated with gathering many measurements on many people. In this paper, we discuss how previous studies considering small samples have focused on Bayesian methods with diffuse priors. The small sample literature has shown that diffuse priors may cause problems because they become unintentionally informative. Instead, we outline how researchers can create weakly informative admissible-range-restricted priors, even in the absence of previous studies. A simulation study shows that metrics like relative bias and non-null detection rates with these admissible-range-restricted priors improve small N properties of DSEM compared to diffuse priors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalStructural Equation Modeling
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Structural Equation Model
Structural Equation Modeling
Structural dynamics
structural model
Dynamic Equation
Small Sample
Bayesian Methods
Longitudinal Data
Range of data
Data Model
Innovation
Simulation Study
Metric
Methodology
innovation
simulation
cause
methodology
trend
performance

Keywords

  • DSEM
  • intensive longitudinal data
  • prior distribution
  • small sample
  • Time-Series Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Two-Level Dynamic Structural Equation Models with Small Samples. / McNeish, Daniel.

In: Structural Equation Modeling, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8ee7290b168f43e18058f3f4558f9cff,
title = "Two-Level Dynamic Structural Equation Models with Small Samples",
abstract = "Advances in data collection have made intensive longitudinal data easier to collect, unlocking potential for methodological innovations to model such data. Dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM) is one such methodology but recent studies have suggested that its small N performance is poor. This is problematic because small N data are omnipresent in empirical applications due to logistical and financial concerns associated with gathering many measurements on many people. In this paper, we discuss how previous studies considering small samples have focused on Bayesian methods with diffuse priors. The small sample literature has shown that diffuse priors may cause problems because they become unintentionally informative. Instead, we outline how researchers can create weakly informative admissible-range-restricted priors, even in the absence of previous studies. A simulation study shows that metrics like relative bias and non-null detection rates with these admissible-range-restricted priors improve small N properties of DSEM compared to diffuse priors.",
keywords = "DSEM, intensive longitudinal data, prior distribution, small sample, Time-Series Analysis",
author = "Daniel McNeish",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10705511.2019.1578657",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Structural Equation Modeling",
issn = "1070-5511",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two-Level Dynamic Structural Equation Models with Small Samples

AU - McNeish, Daniel

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Advances in data collection have made intensive longitudinal data easier to collect, unlocking potential for methodological innovations to model such data. Dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM) is one such methodology but recent studies have suggested that its small N performance is poor. This is problematic because small N data are omnipresent in empirical applications due to logistical and financial concerns associated with gathering many measurements on many people. In this paper, we discuss how previous studies considering small samples have focused on Bayesian methods with diffuse priors. The small sample literature has shown that diffuse priors may cause problems because they become unintentionally informative. Instead, we outline how researchers can create weakly informative admissible-range-restricted priors, even in the absence of previous studies. A simulation study shows that metrics like relative bias and non-null detection rates with these admissible-range-restricted priors improve small N properties of DSEM compared to diffuse priors.

AB - Advances in data collection have made intensive longitudinal data easier to collect, unlocking potential for methodological innovations to model such data. Dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM) is one such methodology but recent studies have suggested that its small N performance is poor. This is problematic because small N data are omnipresent in empirical applications due to logistical and financial concerns associated with gathering many measurements on many people. In this paper, we discuss how previous studies considering small samples have focused on Bayesian methods with diffuse priors. The small sample literature has shown that diffuse priors may cause problems because they become unintentionally informative. Instead, we outline how researchers can create weakly informative admissible-range-restricted priors, even in the absence of previous studies. A simulation study shows that metrics like relative bias and non-null detection rates with these admissible-range-restricted priors improve small N properties of DSEM compared to diffuse priors.

KW - DSEM

KW - intensive longitudinal data

KW - prior distribution

KW - small sample

KW - Time-Series Analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063624168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063624168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10705511.2019.1578657

DO - 10.1080/10705511.2019.1578657

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85063624168

JO - Structural Equation Modeling

JF - Structural Equation Modeling

SN - 1070-5511

ER -