Two Items Remembered as Precisely as One: How Integral Features Can Improve Visual Working Memory

Gi Yeul Bae, Jonathan I. Flombaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the ongoing debate about the efficacy of visual working memory for more than three items, a consensus has emerged that memory precision declines as memory load increases from one to three. Many studies have reported that memory precision seems to be worse for two items than for one. We argue that memory for two items appears less precise than that for one only because two items present observers with a correspondence challenge that does not arise when only one item is stored-the need to relate observations to their corresponding memory representations. In three experiments, we prevented correspondence errors in two-item trials by varying sample items along task-irrelevant but integral (as opposed to separable) dimensions. (Initial experiments with a classic sorting paradigm identified integral feature relationships.) In three memory experiments, our manipulation produced equally precise representations of two items and of one item.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2038-2047
Number of pages10
JournalPsychological Science
Volume24
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Consensus

Keywords

  • auditory perception
  • short-term memory
  • size discrimination
  • visual memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Two Items Remembered as Precisely as One : How Integral Features Can Improve Visual Working Memory. / Bae, Gi Yeul; Flombaum, Jonathan I.

In: Psychological Science, Vol. 24, No. 10, 10.2013, p. 2038-2047.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dee09b7e81e2457b974d9392568489fa,
title = "Two Items Remembered as Precisely as One: How Integral Features Can Improve Visual Working Memory",
abstract = "In the ongoing debate about the efficacy of visual working memory for more than three items, a consensus has emerged that memory precision declines as memory load increases from one to three. Many studies have reported that memory precision seems to be worse for two items than for one. We argue that memory for two items appears less precise than that for one only because two items present observers with a correspondence challenge that does not arise when only one item is stored-the need to relate observations to their corresponding memory representations. In three experiments, we prevented correspondence errors in two-item trials by varying sample items along task-irrelevant but integral (as opposed to separable) dimensions. (Initial experiments with a classic sorting paradigm identified integral feature relationships.) In three memory experiments, our manipulation produced equally precise representations of two items and of one item.",
keywords = "auditory perception, short-term memory, size discrimination, visual memory",
author = "Bae, {Gi Yeul} and Flombaum, {Jonathan I.}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1177/0956797613484938",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "2038--2047",
journal = "Psychological Science",
issn = "0956-7976",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two Items Remembered as Precisely as One

T2 - How Integral Features Can Improve Visual Working Memory

AU - Bae, Gi Yeul

AU - Flombaum, Jonathan I.

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - In the ongoing debate about the efficacy of visual working memory for more than three items, a consensus has emerged that memory precision declines as memory load increases from one to three. Many studies have reported that memory precision seems to be worse for two items than for one. We argue that memory for two items appears less precise than that for one only because two items present observers with a correspondence challenge that does not arise when only one item is stored-the need to relate observations to their corresponding memory representations. In three experiments, we prevented correspondence errors in two-item trials by varying sample items along task-irrelevant but integral (as opposed to separable) dimensions. (Initial experiments with a classic sorting paradigm identified integral feature relationships.) In three memory experiments, our manipulation produced equally precise representations of two items and of one item.

AB - In the ongoing debate about the efficacy of visual working memory for more than three items, a consensus has emerged that memory precision declines as memory load increases from one to three. Many studies have reported that memory precision seems to be worse for two items than for one. We argue that memory for two items appears less precise than that for one only because two items present observers with a correspondence challenge that does not arise when only one item is stored-the need to relate observations to their corresponding memory representations. In three experiments, we prevented correspondence errors in two-item trials by varying sample items along task-irrelevant but integral (as opposed to separable) dimensions. (Initial experiments with a classic sorting paradigm identified integral feature relationships.) In three memory experiments, our manipulation produced equally precise representations of two items and of one item.

KW - auditory perception

KW - short-term memory

KW - size discrimination

KW - visual memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885355888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885355888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0956797613484938

DO - 10.1177/0956797613484938

M3 - Article

C2 - 23938276

AN - SCOPUS:84885355888

VL - 24

SP - 2038

EP - 2047

JO - Psychological Science

JF - Psychological Science

SN - 0956-7976

IS - 10

ER -