Two effective causal paths that explain the adoption of US state environmental justice policy

Yushim Kim, Stefan Verweij

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Over two decades have passed since the federal policy on environmental justice (EO 12898) was issued. However, empirical evidence indicates that injustice persists and that US states vary in their adoption of the terms of the environmental justice (EJ) policy. Moreover, studies of the explanations for the variation in states’ adoption of EJ policy are rare and have yielded puzzling findings—e.g., environmental interest groups are not associated with states’ EJ policy adoption, or the severity of problems is associated inversely with their adoption. We examined the progress and variation in states’ EJ policy adoption as of 2005 using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Our analysis showed first that a strong environmental interest group presence, combined with high racial diversity and low problem severity, is sufficient for a high level of EJ policy adoption, especially in Western states. Second, when environmental interest group presence is weak, if it is combined, again, with high racial diversity and the presence of a more liberal state government, a high level of EJ policy adoption also occurs. This is observed in the East coast, Midwestern, and Southern regions of the USA. Environmental politics and policy research can benefit from a configurational approach, especially when there is no guiding theory on the conjunctional effects of key factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)505-523
Number of pages19
JournalPolicy Sciences
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Keywords

  • Configurational comparative method
  • Environmental justice policy
  • Policy adoption
  • fsQCA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Public Administration
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Two effective causal paths that explain the adoption of US state environmental justice policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this