TY - JOUR
T1 - Tutorial
T2 - The practical application of longitudinal structural equation mediation models in clinical trials
AU - Goldsmith, Kimberley A.
AU - Mackinnon, David
AU - Chalder, Trudie
AU - White, Peter D.
AU - Sharpe, Michael
AU - Pickles, Andrew
N1 - Funding Information:
Some of the ideas in the article were presented at the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Trainees Conference, Leeds, United Kingdom, November 2013; the International Clinical Trials Methodology Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom, November 2015; the Society for Prevention Research Conference, San Francisco, California, May 2016; and reported in a doctoral dissertation. A related report describing considerations and assumptions in the context of simplex mediation models has been published (Goldsmith, Chalder, White, Sharpe, & Pickles, 2016). Peter D. White has done voluntary and paid consultancy work for the United Kingdom government and a reinsurance company. Trudie Chalder has received royalties from Sheldon Press and Constable and Robinson. Michael Sharpe has done voluntary and paid consultancy work for the United Kingdom government, consultancy work for an insurance company, and has received royalties from Oxford University Press. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Health Service (NHS), the NIHR, or the Department of Health. Funding for the PACE trial was provided by the Medical Research Council, Department for Health for England, The Scottish Chief Scientist Office, and the Department for Work and Pensions. Trudie Chalder, Andrew Pickles, and Kimberley A. Goldsmith were in part supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London. Kimberley A. Goldsmith was also funded by an NIHR Doctoral Fellowship, DRF-2011-04-061. David P. MacKinnon was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA09757). We thank Anthony Johnson for reading and commenting on the article, and Matthew Valente and Oscar Gonzalez for critical proofreading.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Psychological Association.
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - The study of mediation of treatment effects, or how treatments work, is important to understanding and improving psychological and behavioral treatments, but applications often focus on mediators and outcomes measured at a single time point. Such cross-sectional analyses do not respect the implied temporal ordering that mediation suggests. Clinical trials of treatments often provide repeated measures of outcomes and, increasingly, of mediators as well. Repeated measurements allow the application of various types of longitudinal structural equation mediation models. These provide flexibility in modeling, including the ability to incorporate some types of measurement error and unmeasured confounding that can strengthen the robustness of findings. The usual approach is to identify the most theoretically plausible model and apply that model. In the absence of clear theory, we put forward the option of fitting a few theoretically plausible models, providing a type of sensitivity analysis for the mediation hypothesis. In this tutorial, we outline how to fit several longitudinal mediation models, including simplex, latent growth and latent change models. This will allow readers to learn about one type of model that is of interest, or about several alternative models, so that they can take this sensitivity approach. We use the Pacing, Graded Activity, and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Randomized Evaluation (PACE) trial of rehabilitative treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome (ISRCTN 54285094) as a motivating example and describe how to fit and interpret various longitudinal mediation models using simulated data similar to those in the PACE trial. The simulated data set and Mplus code and output are provided.
AB - The study of mediation of treatment effects, or how treatments work, is important to understanding and improving psychological and behavioral treatments, but applications often focus on mediators and outcomes measured at a single time point. Such cross-sectional analyses do not respect the implied temporal ordering that mediation suggests. Clinical trials of treatments often provide repeated measures of outcomes and, increasingly, of mediators as well. Repeated measurements allow the application of various types of longitudinal structural equation mediation models. These provide flexibility in modeling, including the ability to incorporate some types of measurement error and unmeasured confounding that can strengthen the robustness of findings. The usual approach is to identify the most theoretically plausible model and apply that model. In the absence of clear theory, we put forward the option of fitting a few theoretically plausible models, providing a type of sensitivity analysis for the mediation hypothesis. In this tutorial, we outline how to fit several longitudinal mediation models, including simplex, latent growth and latent change models. This will allow readers to learn about one type of model that is of interest, or about several alternative models, so that they can take this sensitivity approach. We use the Pacing, Graded Activity, and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Randomized Evaluation (PACE) trial of rehabilitative treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome (ISRCTN 54285094) as a motivating example and describe how to fit and interpret various longitudinal mediation models using simulated data similar to those in the PACE trial. The simulated data set and Mplus code and output are provided.
KW - Clinical trials
KW - Longitudinal mediation models
KW - Measurement error
KW - Mediation
KW - Structural equation models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039171779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039171779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/met0000154
DO - 10.1037/met0000154
M3 - Article
C2 - 29283590
AN - SCOPUS:85039171779
SN - 1082-989X
VL - 23
SP - 191
EP - 207
JO - Psychological Methods
JF - Psychological Methods
IS - 2
ER -