Turning the corner on procedural justice theory: exploring reverse causality with an experimental vignette in a longitudinal survey

Rick Trinkner, Ryan D. Mays, Ellen S. Cohn, Karen T. Van Gundy, Cesar J. Rebellon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Traditional police procedural justice theory argues that citizen perceptions of fair treatment by police officers increase police legitimacy, which leads to an increased likelihood of legal compliance. Recently, Nagin and Telep (2017) criticized these causal assumptions, arguing that prior literature has not definitively ruled out reverse causality—that is, legitimacy influences perceptions of fairness and/or compliance influences perceptions of both fairness and legitimacy. The goal of the present paper was to explore this critique using experimental and correlational methodologies within a longitudinal framework. Methods: Adolescents completed a vignette-based experiment that manipulated two aspects of officer behavior linked to perceptions of fairness: voice and impartiality. After reading the vignette, participants rated the fairness and legitimacy of the officer within the situation. At three time points prior to the experiment (1, 17, and 31 months), participants completed surveys measuring their global perceptions of police legitimacy and self-reported delinquency. Data were analyzed to assess the extent to which global legitimacy and delinquency predicted responses to the vignette net of experimental manipulations and controls. Results: Both experimental manipulations led to higher perceptions of situational procedural justice and officer legitimacy. Prior perceptions of police legitimacy did not predict judgments of situational procedural justice; however, in some cases, prior engagement in delinquency was negatively related to situational procedural justice. Prior perceptions of legitimacy were positively associated with situational perceptions of legitimacy regardless of experimental manipulations. Conclusions: This study showed mixed support for the case of reverse causality among police procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Experimental Criminology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

causality
legitimacy
justice
police
fairness
delinquency
manipulation
experiment
police officer
citizen
adolescent
methodology

Keywords

  • Delinquency
  • Juvenile justice
  • Legitimacy
  • Police
  • Procedural justice
  • Reverse causality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Turning the corner on procedural justice theory : exploring reverse causality with an experimental vignette in a longitudinal survey. / Trinkner, Rick; Mays, Ryan D.; Cohn, Ellen S.; Van Gundy, Karen T.; Rebellon, Cesar J.

In: Journal of Experimental Criminology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8b5ff31df48042d6ac427365d120509d,
title = "Turning the corner on procedural justice theory: exploring reverse causality with an experimental vignette in a longitudinal survey",
abstract = "Objectives: Traditional police procedural justice theory argues that citizen perceptions of fair treatment by police officers increase police legitimacy, which leads to an increased likelihood of legal compliance. Recently, Nagin and Telep (2017) criticized these causal assumptions, arguing that prior literature has not definitively ruled out reverse causality—that is, legitimacy influences perceptions of fairness and/or compliance influences perceptions of both fairness and legitimacy. The goal of the present paper was to explore this critique using experimental and correlational methodologies within a longitudinal framework. Methods: Adolescents completed a vignette-based experiment that manipulated two aspects of officer behavior linked to perceptions of fairness: voice and impartiality. After reading the vignette, participants rated the fairness and legitimacy of the officer within the situation. At three time points prior to the experiment (1, 17, and 31 months), participants completed surveys measuring their global perceptions of police legitimacy and self-reported delinquency. Data were analyzed to assess the extent to which global legitimacy and delinquency predicted responses to the vignette net of experimental manipulations and controls. Results: Both experimental manipulations led to higher perceptions of situational procedural justice and officer legitimacy. Prior perceptions of police legitimacy did not predict judgments of situational procedural justice; however, in some cases, prior engagement in delinquency was negatively related to situational procedural justice. Prior perceptions of legitimacy were positively associated with situational perceptions of legitimacy regardless of experimental manipulations. Conclusions: This study showed mixed support for the case of reverse causality among police procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance.",
keywords = "Delinquency, Juvenile justice, Legitimacy, Police, Procedural justice, Reverse causality",
author = "Rick Trinkner and Mays, {Ryan D.} and Cohn, {Ellen S.} and {Van Gundy}, {Karen T.} and Rebellon, {Cesar J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11292-019-09358-1",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Criminology",
issn = "1573-3750",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Turning the corner on procedural justice theory

T2 - exploring reverse causality with an experimental vignette in a longitudinal survey

AU - Trinkner, Rick

AU - Mays, Ryan D.

AU - Cohn, Ellen S.

AU - Van Gundy, Karen T.

AU - Rebellon, Cesar J.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objectives: Traditional police procedural justice theory argues that citizen perceptions of fair treatment by police officers increase police legitimacy, which leads to an increased likelihood of legal compliance. Recently, Nagin and Telep (2017) criticized these causal assumptions, arguing that prior literature has not definitively ruled out reverse causality—that is, legitimacy influences perceptions of fairness and/or compliance influences perceptions of both fairness and legitimacy. The goal of the present paper was to explore this critique using experimental and correlational methodologies within a longitudinal framework. Methods: Adolescents completed a vignette-based experiment that manipulated two aspects of officer behavior linked to perceptions of fairness: voice and impartiality. After reading the vignette, participants rated the fairness and legitimacy of the officer within the situation. At three time points prior to the experiment (1, 17, and 31 months), participants completed surveys measuring their global perceptions of police legitimacy and self-reported delinquency. Data were analyzed to assess the extent to which global legitimacy and delinquency predicted responses to the vignette net of experimental manipulations and controls. Results: Both experimental manipulations led to higher perceptions of situational procedural justice and officer legitimacy. Prior perceptions of police legitimacy did not predict judgments of situational procedural justice; however, in some cases, prior engagement in delinquency was negatively related to situational procedural justice. Prior perceptions of legitimacy were positively associated with situational perceptions of legitimacy regardless of experimental manipulations. Conclusions: This study showed mixed support for the case of reverse causality among police procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance.

AB - Objectives: Traditional police procedural justice theory argues that citizen perceptions of fair treatment by police officers increase police legitimacy, which leads to an increased likelihood of legal compliance. Recently, Nagin and Telep (2017) criticized these causal assumptions, arguing that prior literature has not definitively ruled out reverse causality—that is, legitimacy influences perceptions of fairness and/or compliance influences perceptions of both fairness and legitimacy. The goal of the present paper was to explore this critique using experimental and correlational methodologies within a longitudinal framework. Methods: Adolescents completed a vignette-based experiment that manipulated two aspects of officer behavior linked to perceptions of fairness: voice and impartiality. After reading the vignette, participants rated the fairness and legitimacy of the officer within the situation. At three time points prior to the experiment (1, 17, and 31 months), participants completed surveys measuring their global perceptions of police legitimacy and self-reported delinquency. Data were analyzed to assess the extent to which global legitimacy and delinquency predicted responses to the vignette net of experimental manipulations and controls. Results: Both experimental manipulations led to higher perceptions of situational procedural justice and officer legitimacy. Prior perceptions of police legitimacy did not predict judgments of situational procedural justice; however, in some cases, prior engagement in delinquency was negatively related to situational procedural justice. Prior perceptions of legitimacy were positively associated with situational perceptions of legitimacy regardless of experimental manipulations. Conclusions: This study showed mixed support for the case of reverse causality among police procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance.

KW - Delinquency

KW - Juvenile justice

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Police

KW - Procedural justice

KW - Reverse causality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064836671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064836671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11292-019-09358-1

DO - 10.1007/s11292-019-09358-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064836671

JO - Journal of Experimental Criminology

JF - Journal of Experimental Criminology

SN - 1573-3750

ER -