Truth and credibility in sincere policy analysis: Alternative Approaches for the Production of Policy-Relevant Knowledge

Barry Bozeman; David Landsbergen

doi:10.1177/0193841X8901300402

Truth and credibility in sincere policy analysis: Alternative Approaches for the Production of Policy-Relevant Knowledge

Barry Bozeman, David Landsbergen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article distinguishes two competing approaches to policy analysis: a credibility approach and a truth approach. The credibility approach would define the role of the policy analyst as a search for plausible argument instead of truth. After defining the basic assumptions of the truth and credibility approaches, the implications for the conduct of policy analysis are explored.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	355-379
Number of pages	25
Journal	Evaluation Review
Volume	13
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8901300402
State	Published - Aug 1989
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Social Sciences(all)

Access to Document

10.1177/0193841X8901300402

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Truth and credibility in sincere policy analysis: Alternative Approaches for the Production of Policy-Relevant Knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{bb9383a1913149ca82fd4841fa21286c,

title = "Truth and credibility in sincere policy analysis: Alternative Approaches for the Production of Policy-Relevant Knowledge",

abstract = "This article distinguishes two competing approaches to policy analysis: a credibility approach and a truth approach. The credibility approach would define the role of the policy analyst as a search for plausible argument instead of truth. After defining the basic assumptions of the truth and credibility approaches, the implications for the conduct of policy analysis are explored.",

author = "Barry Bozeman and David Landsbergen",

year = "1989",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1177/0193841X8901300402",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "13",

pages = "355--379",

journal = "Evaluation Review",

issn = "0193-841X",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Truth and credibility in sincere policy analysis

T2 - Alternative Approaches for the Production of Policy-Relevant Knowledge

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Landsbergen, David

PY - 1989/8

Y1 - 1989/8

N2 - This article distinguishes two competing approaches to policy analysis: a credibility approach and a truth approach. The credibility approach would define the role of the policy analyst as a search for plausible argument instead of truth. After defining the basic assumptions of the truth and credibility approaches, the implications for the conduct of policy analysis are explored.

AB - This article distinguishes two competing approaches to policy analysis: a credibility approach and a truth approach. The credibility approach would define the role of the policy analyst as a search for plausible argument instead of truth. After defining the basic assumptions of the truth and credibility approaches, the implications for the conduct of policy analysis are explored.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973715362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973715362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0193841X8901300402

DO - 10.1177/0193841X8901300402

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84973715362

VL - 13

SP - 355

EP - 379

JO - Evaluation Review

JF - Evaluation Review

SN - 0193-841X

IS - 4

ER -

Truth and credibility in sincere policy analysis: Alternative Approaches for the Production of Policy-Relevant Knowledge

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this