Troubling Anal Sex: Gender, Power, and Sexual Compliance in Heterosexual Experiences of Anal Intercourse

Breanne Fahs, Eric Swank, Lindsay Clevenger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Existing literatures on anal sex mostly focus on links between anal sex and public health, particularly sexual risk-taking. Drawing upon feminist theoretical frameworks, this study linked anal sex activities of heterosexual men and women to broader issues of sexist power imbalances. This study analyzed survey data from 205 undergraduates to assess the relationship between frequency of vaginal and anal intercourse and ten correlates, including identity, sexual aggression, and attitudinal and behavioral practices. Being single and support for women’s abstinence was negatively correlated with vaginal but not anal sex, while anal sex was connected to support of hegemonic masculinity and lifetime experiences with sexual coercion, particularly for women. Implications for gender and power dynamics of heterosexual anal sex were explored.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-38
Number of pages20
JournalGender Issues
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

gender
experience
masculinity
aggression
public health
literature

Keywords

  • Anal sex
  • Gender roles
  • Sexual coercion
  • Sexual compliance
  • Sexuality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies

Cite this

Troubling Anal Sex : Gender, Power, and Sexual Compliance in Heterosexual Experiences of Anal Intercourse. / Fahs, Breanne; Swank, Eric; Clevenger, Lindsay.

In: Gender Issues, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2014, p. 19-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e38c514c912f4643a46adb9f428ee575,
title = "Troubling Anal Sex: Gender, Power, and Sexual Compliance in Heterosexual Experiences of Anal Intercourse",
abstract = "Existing literatures on anal sex mostly focus on links between anal sex and public health, particularly sexual risk-taking. Drawing upon feminist theoretical frameworks, this study linked anal sex activities of heterosexual men and women to broader issues of sexist power imbalances. This study analyzed survey data from 205 undergraduates to assess the relationship between frequency of vaginal and anal intercourse and ten correlates, including identity, sexual aggression, and attitudinal and behavioral practices. Being single and support for women’s abstinence was negatively correlated with vaginal but not anal sex, while anal sex was connected to support of hegemonic masculinity and lifetime experiences with sexual coercion, particularly for women. Implications for gender and power dynamics of heterosexual anal sex were explored.",
keywords = "Anal sex, Gender roles, Sexual coercion, Sexual compliance, Sexuality",
author = "Breanne Fahs and Eric Swank and Lindsay Clevenger",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s12147-014-9129-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "19--38",
journal = "Gender Issues",
issn = "1098-092X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Troubling Anal Sex

T2 - Gender, Power, and Sexual Compliance in Heterosexual Experiences of Anal Intercourse

AU - Fahs, Breanne

AU - Swank, Eric

AU - Clevenger, Lindsay

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Existing literatures on anal sex mostly focus on links between anal sex and public health, particularly sexual risk-taking. Drawing upon feminist theoretical frameworks, this study linked anal sex activities of heterosexual men and women to broader issues of sexist power imbalances. This study analyzed survey data from 205 undergraduates to assess the relationship between frequency of vaginal and anal intercourse and ten correlates, including identity, sexual aggression, and attitudinal and behavioral practices. Being single and support for women’s abstinence was negatively correlated with vaginal but not anal sex, while anal sex was connected to support of hegemonic masculinity and lifetime experiences with sexual coercion, particularly for women. Implications for gender and power dynamics of heterosexual anal sex were explored.

AB - Existing literatures on anal sex mostly focus on links between anal sex and public health, particularly sexual risk-taking. Drawing upon feminist theoretical frameworks, this study linked anal sex activities of heterosexual men and women to broader issues of sexist power imbalances. This study analyzed survey data from 205 undergraduates to assess the relationship between frequency of vaginal and anal intercourse and ten correlates, including identity, sexual aggression, and attitudinal and behavioral practices. Being single and support for women’s abstinence was negatively correlated with vaginal but not anal sex, while anal sex was connected to support of hegemonic masculinity and lifetime experiences with sexual coercion, particularly for women. Implications for gender and power dynamics of heterosexual anal sex were explored.

KW - Anal sex

KW - Gender roles

KW - Sexual coercion

KW - Sexual compliance

KW - Sexuality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922566821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922566821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12147-014-9129-7

DO - 10.1007/s12147-014-9129-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84922566821

VL - 32

SP - 19

EP - 38

JO - Gender Issues

JF - Gender Issues

SN - 1098-092X

IS - 1

ER -