Trenchless industry comfort level when using alternative delivery systems

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Trenchless construction projects are typically delivered using the traditional designbid-build (DBB). The DBB sequential process often results in inefficiencies and creates a knowledge gap between the contractor and engineer. Alternative project delivery methods (APDM) were developed to bridge the gap between contractors and engineers, and help mitigate the resulting inefficiencies. APDM have been widely adopted in many industries including highway and building construction. However, they have not gained significant popularity in the trenchless construction industry. This lack of adoption can be attributed to many different reasons, one of these being the comfort level of project stakeholders in implementing APDM. This paper investigates the comfort level of project stakeholders through a questionnaire sent to individuals in the trenchless industry. The findings demonstrate that there are different comfort levels for implementing APDM for each type of project stakeholder and across different APDM's.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationICPTT 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology
PublisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Pages217-226
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)9780784413821
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Event2014 International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology, ICPTT 2014 - Xiamen, China
Duration: Nov 13 2014Nov 15 2014

Other

Other2014 International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology, ICPTT 2014
CountryChina
CityXiamen
Period11/13/1411/15/14

Fingerprint

Contractors
Engineers
industry
Construction industry
Industry
stakeholder
building construction
construction industry
project
road
method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Francom, T., Ariaratnam, S., & El Asmar, M. (2014). Trenchless industry comfort level when using alternative delivery systems. In ICPTT 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology (pp. 217-226). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413821.025

Trenchless industry comfort level when using alternative delivery systems. / Francom, Tober; Ariaratnam, Samuel; El Asmar, Mounir.

ICPTT 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2014. p. 217-226.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Francom, T, Ariaratnam, S & El Asmar, M 2014, Trenchless industry comfort level when using alternative delivery systems. in ICPTT 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), pp. 217-226, 2014 International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology, ICPTT 2014, Xiamen, China, 11/13/14. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413821.025
Francom T, Ariaratnam S, El Asmar M. Trenchless industry comfort level when using alternative delivery systems. In ICPTT 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2014. p. 217-226 https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413821.025
Francom, Tober ; Ariaratnam, Samuel ; El Asmar, Mounir. / Trenchless industry comfort level when using alternative delivery systems. ICPTT 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2014. pp. 217-226
@inproceedings{f62310b952854eea982b7ec9969a881d,
title = "Trenchless industry comfort level when using alternative delivery systems",
abstract = "Trenchless construction projects are typically delivered using the traditional designbid-build (DBB). The DBB sequential process often results in inefficiencies and creates a knowledge gap between the contractor and engineer. Alternative project delivery methods (APDM) were developed to bridge the gap between contractors and engineers, and help mitigate the resulting inefficiencies. APDM have been widely adopted in many industries including highway and building construction. However, they have not gained significant popularity in the trenchless construction industry. This lack of adoption can be attributed to many different reasons, one of these being the comfort level of project stakeholders in implementing APDM. This paper investigates the comfort level of project stakeholders through a questionnaire sent to individuals in the trenchless industry. The findings demonstrate that there are different comfort levels for implementing APDM for each type of project stakeholder and across different APDM's.",
author = "Tober Francom and Samuel Ariaratnam and {El Asmar}, Mounir",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1061/9780784413821.025",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780784413821",
pages = "217--226",
booktitle = "ICPTT 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Trenchless industry comfort level when using alternative delivery systems

AU - Francom, Tober

AU - Ariaratnam, Samuel

AU - El Asmar, Mounir

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Trenchless construction projects are typically delivered using the traditional designbid-build (DBB). The DBB sequential process often results in inefficiencies and creates a knowledge gap between the contractor and engineer. Alternative project delivery methods (APDM) were developed to bridge the gap between contractors and engineers, and help mitigate the resulting inefficiencies. APDM have been widely adopted in many industries including highway and building construction. However, they have not gained significant popularity in the trenchless construction industry. This lack of adoption can be attributed to many different reasons, one of these being the comfort level of project stakeholders in implementing APDM. This paper investigates the comfort level of project stakeholders through a questionnaire sent to individuals in the trenchless industry. The findings demonstrate that there are different comfort levels for implementing APDM for each type of project stakeholder and across different APDM's.

AB - Trenchless construction projects are typically delivered using the traditional designbid-build (DBB). The DBB sequential process often results in inefficiencies and creates a knowledge gap between the contractor and engineer. Alternative project delivery methods (APDM) were developed to bridge the gap between contractors and engineers, and help mitigate the resulting inefficiencies. APDM have been widely adopted in many industries including highway and building construction. However, they have not gained significant popularity in the trenchless construction industry. This lack of adoption can be attributed to many different reasons, one of these being the comfort level of project stakeholders in implementing APDM. This paper investigates the comfort level of project stakeholders through a questionnaire sent to individuals in the trenchless industry. The findings demonstrate that there are different comfort levels for implementing APDM for each type of project stakeholder and across different APDM's.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919328631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919328631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/9780784413821.025

DO - 10.1061/9780784413821.025

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84919328631

SN - 9780784413821

SP - 217

EP - 226

BT - ICPTT 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology

PB - American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

ER -