Transverse patterning in pigeons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability of pigeons to form configural stimulus representations was assessed in two operant discrimination experiments. In Experiment 1 the transverse patterning problem of Spence (1952) was trained. In Phase 1, subjects had to choose stimulus A on A + B - trials; B + C- trials were added in Phase 2. In Phase 3, the first two pairs were combined with C+ A- trials. The success of the subjects was simulated by a model assuming that elemental and configural stimulus representations coexist in a stable proportion, even in the phases of the experiment which do not require configural stimulus representations for successful solution. Experiment 2 replicated the first two phases of Experiment 1, but trained A + C- in Phase 3. Comparison of the results of this experiment with simulations of the model showed that elemental and configural stimulus representations coexisted in similar proportions as in Experiment 1, even though they were not necessary for successful task solution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-130
Number of pages12
JournalBehavioural Processes
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Columbidae
pigeons
simulation models
experiment
simulation
trial

Keywords

  • Choice model
  • Key peck
  • Operant discrimination
  • Pigeon
  • Transverse patterning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Transverse patterning in pigeons. / Wynne, Clive.

In: Behavioural Processes, Vol. 38, No. 2, 1996, p. 119-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wynne, Clive. / Transverse patterning in pigeons. In: Behavioural Processes. 1996 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 119-130.
@article{3bcdc6bf65b740b3a60546eb04c4c48f,
title = "Transverse patterning in pigeons",
abstract = "The ability of pigeons to form configural stimulus representations was assessed in two operant discrimination experiments. In Experiment 1 the transverse patterning problem of Spence (1952) was trained. In Phase 1, subjects had to choose stimulus A on A + B - trials; B + C- trials were added in Phase 2. In Phase 3, the first two pairs were combined with C+ A- trials. The success of the subjects was simulated by a model assuming that elemental and configural stimulus representations coexist in a stable proportion, even in the phases of the experiment which do not require configural stimulus representations for successful solution. Experiment 2 replicated the first two phases of Experiment 1, but trained A + C- in Phase 3. Comparison of the results of this experiment with simulations of the model showed that elemental and configural stimulus representations coexisted in similar proportions as in Experiment 1, even though they were not necessary for successful task solution.",
keywords = "Choice model, Key peck, Operant discrimination, Pigeon, Transverse patterning",
author = "Clive Wynne",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00032-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "119--130",
journal = "Behavioural Processes",
issn = "0376-6357",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transverse patterning in pigeons

AU - Wynne, Clive

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - The ability of pigeons to form configural stimulus representations was assessed in two operant discrimination experiments. In Experiment 1 the transverse patterning problem of Spence (1952) was trained. In Phase 1, subjects had to choose stimulus A on A + B - trials; B + C- trials were added in Phase 2. In Phase 3, the first two pairs were combined with C+ A- trials. The success of the subjects was simulated by a model assuming that elemental and configural stimulus representations coexist in a stable proportion, even in the phases of the experiment which do not require configural stimulus representations for successful solution. Experiment 2 replicated the first two phases of Experiment 1, but trained A + C- in Phase 3. Comparison of the results of this experiment with simulations of the model showed that elemental and configural stimulus representations coexisted in similar proportions as in Experiment 1, even though they were not necessary for successful task solution.

AB - The ability of pigeons to form configural stimulus representations was assessed in two operant discrimination experiments. In Experiment 1 the transverse patterning problem of Spence (1952) was trained. In Phase 1, subjects had to choose stimulus A on A + B - trials; B + C- trials were added in Phase 2. In Phase 3, the first two pairs were combined with C+ A- trials. The success of the subjects was simulated by a model assuming that elemental and configural stimulus representations coexist in a stable proportion, even in the phases of the experiment which do not require configural stimulus representations for successful solution. Experiment 2 replicated the first two phases of Experiment 1, but trained A + C- in Phase 3. Comparison of the results of this experiment with simulations of the model showed that elemental and configural stimulus representations coexisted in similar proportions as in Experiment 1, even though they were not necessary for successful task solution.

KW - Choice model

KW - Key peck

KW - Operant discrimination

KW - Pigeon

KW - Transverse patterning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029845848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029845848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00032-0

DO - 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00032-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0029845848

VL - 38

SP - 119

EP - 130

JO - Behavioural Processes

JF - Behavioural Processes

SN - 0376-6357

IS - 2

ER -