Abstract

Two critical questions for the regulatory oversight of nanotechnology are (1) at what level of government should regulation take place, and (2) what form should regulation take? These questions are intrinsically linked. Regarding the first question, it is widely assumed that national governments are the appropriate locus of authority for regulating technologies, including nanotechnology. In this view, sub-national, international, and private measures should all be relegated, at most, to subservient and tentative roles. Regarding the second question, because national governments are presumptively the appropriate regulators, often it is assumed that the traditional tools of governmental oversight– command-and-control regulations– are appropriate for addressing the risks of new technologies. Despite this mainstream wisdom, we and others have argued that international coordination of national regulation would provide important benefits. International coordination promises to avoid many of the pitfalls experienced by prior technologies as a result of inconsistent national regulation. In addition, an international approach to regulation may create incentives for inter-state cooperation in trade, environmental protection, labor, and the numerous other fields that nanotechnology will necessarily implicate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Nanotechnology Challenge: Creating Legal Institutions for Uncertain Risks
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages179-202
Number of pages24
ISBN (Print)9780511988554, 9780521767385
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Governance
Nanotechnology
Government
Locus
Labor
Government Regulation
Authority
Pitfalls
Environmental Protection
Wisdom
Incentives

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Marchant, G., Abbott, K., Sylvester, D., & Gulley, L. M. (2011). Transnational new governance and the international coordination of nanotechnology oversight. In The Nanotechnology Challenge: Creating Legal Institutions for Uncertain Risks (pp. 179-202). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511988554.011

Transnational new governance and the international coordination of nanotechnology oversight. / Marchant, Gary; Abbott, Kenneth; Sylvester, Douglas; Gulley, Lyn M.

The Nanotechnology Challenge: Creating Legal Institutions for Uncertain Risks. Cambridge University Press, 2011. p. 179-202.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Marchant, G, Abbott, K, Sylvester, D & Gulley, LM 2011, Transnational new governance and the international coordination of nanotechnology oversight. in The Nanotechnology Challenge: Creating Legal Institutions for Uncertain Risks. Cambridge University Press, pp. 179-202. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511988554.011
Marchant G, Abbott K, Sylvester D, Gulley LM. Transnational new governance and the international coordination of nanotechnology oversight. In The Nanotechnology Challenge: Creating Legal Institutions for Uncertain Risks. Cambridge University Press. 2011. p. 179-202 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511988554.011
Marchant, Gary ; Abbott, Kenneth ; Sylvester, Douglas ; Gulley, Lyn M. / Transnational new governance and the international coordination of nanotechnology oversight. The Nanotechnology Challenge: Creating Legal Institutions for Uncertain Risks. Cambridge University Press, 2011. pp. 179-202
@inbook{eebcb8f995be42f7815a220d1679a214,
title = "Transnational new governance and the international coordination of nanotechnology oversight",
abstract = "Two critical questions for the regulatory oversight of nanotechnology are (1) at what level of government should regulation take place, and (2) what form should regulation take? These questions are intrinsically linked. Regarding the first question, it is widely assumed that national governments are the appropriate locus of authority for regulating technologies, including nanotechnology. In this view, sub-national, international, and private measures should all be relegated, at most, to subservient and tentative roles. Regarding the second question, because national governments are presumptively the appropriate regulators, often it is assumed that the traditional tools of governmental oversight– command-and-control regulations– are appropriate for addressing the risks of new technologies. Despite this mainstream wisdom, we and others have argued that international coordination of national regulation would provide important benefits. International coordination promises to avoid many of the pitfalls experienced by prior technologies as a result of inconsistent national regulation. In addition, an international approach to regulation may create incentives for inter-state cooperation in trade, environmental protection, labor, and the numerous other fields that nanotechnology will necessarily implicate.",
author = "Gary Marchant and Kenneth Abbott and Douglas Sylvester and Gulley, {Lyn M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511988554.011",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511988554",
pages = "179--202",
booktitle = "The Nanotechnology Challenge: Creating Legal Institutions for Uncertain Risks",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Transnational new governance and the international coordination of nanotechnology oversight

AU - Marchant, Gary

AU - Abbott, Kenneth

AU - Sylvester, Douglas

AU - Gulley, Lyn M.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Two critical questions for the regulatory oversight of nanotechnology are (1) at what level of government should regulation take place, and (2) what form should regulation take? These questions are intrinsically linked. Regarding the first question, it is widely assumed that national governments are the appropriate locus of authority for regulating technologies, including nanotechnology. In this view, sub-national, international, and private measures should all be relegated, at most, to subservient and tentative roles. Regarding the second question, because national governments are presumptively the appropriate regulators, often it is assumed that the traditional tools of governmental oversight– command-and-control regulations– are appropriate for addressing the risks of new technologies. Despite this mainstream wisdom, we and others have argued that international coordination of national regulation would provide important benefits. International coordination promises to avoid many of the pitfalls experienced by prior technologies as a result of inconsistent national regulation. In addition, an international approach to regulation may create incentives for inter-state cooperation in trade, environmental protection, labor, and the numerous other fields that nanotechnology will necessarily implicate.

AB - Two critical questions for the regulatory oversight of nanotechnology are (1) at what level of government should regulation take place, and (2) what form should regulation take? These questions are intrinsically linked. Regarding the first question, it is widely assumed that national governments are the appropriate locus of authority for regulating technologies, including nanotechnology. In this view, sub-national, international, and private measures should all be relegated, at most, to subservient and tentative roles. Regarding the second question, because national governments are presumptively the appropriate regulators, often it is assumed that the traditional tools of governmental oversight– command-and-control regulations– are appropriate for addressing the risks of new technologies. Despite this mainstream wisdom, we and others have argued that international coordination of national regulation would provide important benefits. International coordination promises to avoid many of the pitfalls experienced by prior technologies as a result of inconsistent national regulation. In addition, an international approach to regulation may create incentives for inter-state cooperation in trade, environmental protection, labor, and the numerous other fields that nanotechnology will necessarily implicate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889886599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889886599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511988554.011

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511988554.011

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780511988554

SN - 9780521767385

SP - 179

EP - 202

BT - The Nanotechnology Challenge: Creating Legal Institutions for Uncertain Risks

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -