TY - JOUR
T1 - Translating obesity
T2 - Navigating the front lines of the "war on fat"
AU - Trainer, Sarah
AU - Slade, Alexandra
AU - Hruschka, Daniel
AU - Williams, Deborah
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - Objectives: Obesity is treated within medicine, public health, and applied sciences as a biomedical fact with urgent health implications; obesity is also, however, a social fact and one that reveals biomedical concerns can lead to social suffering. Translation of social science-oriented obesity research for broader public good requires navigation of the space between these polemical and seemingly mutually exclusive positions. Methods: Using examples from our own current programs of biocultural research, we explain the opportunities and ongoing challenges of efforts to bridge the chasm between critique and intervention when the topic under discussion is obesity. The examples range from cross-population analyses of human variation and the implications for how we measure and classify obesity to biocultural research into fat-stigma to translational research conducted as part of a larger collaboration across multiple institutions. Results and Conclusions: Translation of social science-oriented obesity research for broader public good requires collaborative work across disciplines and fields, as well as between academics, professionals working in public health and medicine, policy makers, and other key stakeholders. Translation efforts must acknowledge and develop practical programs addressing the "obesity crisis," but also are compelled to question core assumptions upon which obesity-reduction interventions have thus far been based. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 27:61-68, 2015.
AB - Objectives: Obesity is treated within medicine, public health, and applied sciences as a biomedical fact with urgent health implications; obesity is also, however, a social fact and one that reveals biomedical concerns can lead to social suffering. Translation of social science-oriented obesity research for broader public good requires navigation of the space between these polemical and seemingly mutually exclusive positions. Methods: Using examples from our own current programs of biocultural research, we explain the opportunities and ongoing challenges of efforts to bridge the chasm between critique and intervention when the topic under discussion is obesity. The examples range from cross-population analyses of human variation and the implications for how we measure and classify obesity to biocultural research into fat-stigma to translational research conducted as part of a larger collaboration across multiple institutions. Results and Conclusions: Translation of social science-oriented obesity research for broader public good requires collaborative work across disciplines and fields, as well as between academics, professionals working in public health and medicine, policy makers, and other key stakeholders. Translation efforts must acknowledge and develop practical programs addressing the "obesity crisis," but also are compelled to question core assumptions upon which obesity-reduction interventions have thus far been based. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 27:61-68, 2015.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84917709143&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84917709143&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ajhb.22623
DO - 10.1002/ajhb.22623
M3 - Article
C2 - 25251202
AN - SCOPUS:84917709143
SN - 1042-0533
VL - 27
SP - 61
EP - 68
JO - American Journal of Human Biology
JF - American Journal of Human Biology
IS - 1
ER -