Transgender Children and the Right to Transition: Medical Ethics When Parents Mean Well but Cause Harm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article, I argue that (1) transgender adolescents should have the legal right to access puberty-blocking treatment (PBT) without parental approval, and (2) the state has a role to play in publicizing information about gender dysphoria. Not only are transgender children harmed psychologically and physically via lack of access to PBT, but PBT is the established standard of care. Given that we generally think that parental authority should not go so far as to (1) severally and permanently harm a child and (2) prevent a child from access to standard physical care, then it follows that parental authority should not encompass denying gender-dysphoric children access to PBT. Moreover, transgender children without supportive parents cannot be helped without access to health care clinics and counseling to facilitate the transition. Hence there is an additional duty of the state to help facilitate sharing this information with vulnerable teens.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-59
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Bioethics
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Keywords

  • and rehabilitation
  • chronic conditions
  • disability
  • gender/sexuality
  • mental health
  • mental illness
  • right to health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transgender Children and the Right to Transition: Medical Ethics When Parents Mean Well but Cause Harm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this