Tracing basis through virtual spaces

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Whether and to what extent virtual income should be subject to tax has received recent interest from both tax scholars and governments. Options range from a pure cash-out rule, where virtual income is taxed only if it is exchanged for real-world currency or property, to a rule of full taxation, where in-world transactions are taxed to the same extent as similar real-world transactions. To date, the IRS has remained silent on this issue, creating a de facto cash-out rule. The National Taxpayer Advocate has recently called on the IRS to provide guidance regarding the taxation of virtual income, lest taxpayers become inadvertent tax cheats and noncompliance in this area affect compliance more generally. This Article addresses a question that must be resolved regardless of the approach ultimately chosen, namely, how to account for the tax basis in virtual items. Current law generally takes one of two approaches to basis recovery: The first considers each item of property separately, affording each piece of property its own basis. The second treats property on an aggregate basis and allows for the pooling and averaging of basis. After reviewing the existing approaches, I conclude that the nature of virtual worlds warrants a hybrid approach, where the basis in individual virtual goods is separately tracked, but the basis in fungible currency is pooled and averaged.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)283-328
    Number of pages46
    JournalCornell Law Review
    Volume95
    Issue number2
    StatePublished - Jan 2010

    Fingerprint

    taxes
    taxation
    income
    currency
    transaction
    Law

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Law

    Cite this

    Tracing basis through virtual spaces. / Chodorow, Adam.

    In: Cornell Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 2, 01.2010, p. 283-328.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Chodorow, Adam. / Tracing basis through virtual spaces. In: Cornell Law Review. 2010 ; Vol. 95, No. 2. pp. 283-328.
    @article{14d7d50678194495a2996c0bf297048d,
    title = "Tracing basis through virtual spaces",
    abstract = "Whether and to what extent virtual income should be subject to tax has received recent interest from both tax scholars and governments. Options range from a pure cash-out rule, where virtual income is taxed only if it is exchanged for real-world currency or property, to a rule of full taxation, where in-world transactions are taxed to the same extent as similar real-world transactions. To date, the IRS has remained silent on this issue, creating a de facto cash-out rule. The National Taxpayer Advocate has recently called on the IRS to provide guidance regarding the taxation of virtual income, lest taxpayers become inadvertent tax cheats and noncompliance in this area affect compliance more generally. This Article addresses a question that must be resolved regardless of the approach ultimately chosen, namely, how to account for the tax basis in virtual items. Current law generally takes one of two approaches to basis recovery: The first considers each item of property separately, affording each piece of property its own basis. The second treats property on an aggregate basis and allows for the pooling and averaging of basis. After reviewing the existing approaches, I conclude that the nature of virtual worlds warrants a hybrid approach, where the basis in individual virtual goods is separately tracked, but the basis in fungible currency is pooled and averaged.",
    author = "Adam Chodorow",
    year = "2010",
    month = "1",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "95",
    pages = "283--328",
    journal = "Cornell Law Review",
    issn = "0010-8847",
    publisher = "Cornell Law School",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Tracing basis through virtual spaces

    AU - Chodorow, Adam

    PY - 2010/1

    Y1 - 2010/1

    N2 - Whether and to what extent virtual income should be subject to tax has received recent interest from both tax scholars and governments. Options range from a pure cash-out rule, where virtual income is taxed only if it is exchanged for real-world currency or property, to a rule of full taxation, where in-world transactions are taxed to the same extent as similar real-world transactions. To date, the IRS has remained silent on this issue, creating a de facto cash-out rule. The National Taxpayer Advocate has recently called on the IRS to provide guidance regarding the taxation of virtual income, lest taxpayers become inadvertent tax cheats and noncompliance in this area affect compliance more generally. This Article addresses a question that must be resolved regardless of the approach ultimately chosen, namely, how to account for the tax basis in virtual items. Current law generally takes one of two approaches to basis recovery: The first considers each item of property separately, affording each piece of property its own basis. The second treats property on an aggregate basis and allows for the pooling and averaging of basis. After reviewing the existing approaches, I conclude that the nature of virtual worlds warrants a hybrid approach, where the basis in individual virtual goods is separately tracked, but the basis in fungible currency is pooled and averaged.

    AB - Whether and to what extent virtual income should be subject to tax has received recent interest from both tax scholars and governments. Options range from a pure cash-out rule, where virtual income is taxed only if it is exchanged for real-world currency or property, to a rule of full taxation, where in-world transactions are taxed to the same extent as similar real-world transactions. To date, the IRS has remained silent on this issue, creating a de facto cash-out rule. The National Taxpayer Advocate has recently called on the IRS to provide guidance regarding the taxation of virtual income, lest taxpayers become inadvertent tax cheats and noncompliance in this area affect compliance more generally. This Article addresses a question that must be resolved regardless of the approach ultimately chosen, namely, how to account for the tax basis in virtual items. Current law generally takes one of two approaches to basis recovery: The first considers each item of property separately, affording each piece of property its own basis. The second treats property on an aggregate basis and allows for the pooling and averaging of basis. After reviewing the existing approaches, I conclude that the nature of virtual worlds warrants a hybrid approach, where the basis in individual virtual goods is separately tracked, but the basis in fungible currency is pooled and averaged.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949311151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949311151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:77949311151

    VL - 95

    SP - 283

    EP - 328

    JO - Cornell Law Review

    JF - Cornell Law Review

    SN - 0010-8847

    IS - 2

    ER -