Abstract

The complexity of social-ecological systems (SES) is rooted in the outcomes of node activities connected by network topology. Thus far, in network dynamics research, the connectivity degree (CND), indicating how many nodes are connected to a given node, has been the dominant concept. However, connectivity focuses only on network topology, neglecting the crucial relation to node activities, and thereby leaving system outcomes largely unexplained. Inspired by the phenomenon of “consensus of wills and coordination of activities” often observed in disaster risk management, we propose a new concept of network characteristic, the consilience degree (CSD), aiming to measure the way in which network topology and node activities together contribute to system outcomes. The CSD captures the fact that nodes may assume different states that make their activities more or less compatible. Connecting two nodes with in/compatible states will lead to outcomes that are un/desirable from the perspective of the SES in question. We mathematically prove that the CSD is a generalized CND, and the CND is a special case of CSD. As a general, fundamental concept, the CSD can facilitate the development of a new framework of network properties, models, and theories that allows us to understand patterns of network behavior that cannot be explained in terms of connectivity alone. We further demonstrate that a co-evolutionary mechanism can naturally improve the CSD. Given the generality of co-evolution in SES, we argue that the CSD is an inherent attribute rather than an artificial concept, which underpins the fundamental importance of the CSD to the study of SES.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-356
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

connectivity
Topology
ecological system
social system
topology
Risk management
Disasters
coevolution
disaster
risk management

Keywords

  • Co-evolution
  • Complex networks
  • Consilience degree
  • Disaster risk reduction
  • Social-ecological systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Safety Research
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems—From Connection to Consilience. / Hu, Xiao Bing; Shi, Peijun; Wang, Ming; Ye, Tao; Leeson, Mark S.; Van Der Leeuw, Sander; Wu, Jianguo; Renn, Ortwin; Jaeger, Carlo.

In: International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 343-356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hu, Xiao Bing ; Shi, Peijun ; Wang, Ming ; Ye, Tao ; Leeson, Mark S. ; Van Der Leeuw, Sander ; Wu, Jianguo ; Renn, Ortwin ; Jaeger, Carlo. / Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems—From Connection to Consilience. In: International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. 2017 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 343-356.
@article{189e2dfb54e54cf38b96bc9b133d3088,
title = "Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems—From Connection to Consilience",
abstract = "The complexity of social-ecological systems (SES) is rooted in the outcomes of node activities connected by network topology. Thus far, in network dynamics research, the connectivity degree (CND), indicating how many nodes are connected to a given node, has been the dominant concept. However, connectivity focuses only on network topology, neglecting the crucial relation to node activities, and thereby leaving system outcomes largely unexplained. Inspired by the phenomenon of “consensus of wills and coordination of activities” often observed in disaster risk management, we propose a new concept of network characteristic, the consilience degree (CSD), aiming to measure the way in which network topology and node activities together contribute to system outcomes. The CSD captures the fact that nodes may assume different states that make their activities more or less compatible. Connecting two nodes with in/compatible states will lead to outcomes that are un/desirable from the perspective of the SES in question. We mathematically prove that the CSD is a generalized CND, and the CND is a special case of CSD. As a general, fundamental concept, the CSD can facilitate the development of a new framework of network properties, models, and theories that allows us to understand patterns of network behavior that cannot be explained in terms of connectivity alone. We further demonstrate that a co-evolutionary mechanism can naturally improve the CSD. Given the generality of co-evolution in SES, we argue that the CSD is an inherent attribute rather than an artificial concept, which underpins the fundamental importance of the CSD to the study of SES.",
keywords = "Co-evolution, Complex networks, Consilience degree, Disaster risk reduction, Social-ecological systems",
author = "Hu, {Xiao Bing} and Peijun Shi and Ming Wang and Tao Ye and Leeson, {Mark S.} and {Van Der Leeuw}, Sander and Jianguo Wu and Ortwin Renn and Carlo Jaeger",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13753-017-0146-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "343--356",
journal = "International Journal of Disaster Risk Science",
issn = "2095-0055",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems—From Connection to Consilience

AU - Hu, Xiao Bing

AU - Shi, Peijun

AU - Wang, Ming

AU - Ye, Tao

AU - Leeson, Mark S.

AU - Van Der Leeuw, Sander

AU - Wu, Jianguo

AU - Renn, Ortwin

AU - Jaeger, Carlo

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - The complexity of social-ecological systems (SES) is rooted in the outcomes of node activities connected by network topology. Thus far, in network dynamics research, the connectivity degree (CND), indicating how many nodes are connected to a given node, has been the dominant concept. However, connectivity focuses only on network topology, neglecting the crucial relation to node activities, and thereby leaving system outcomes largely unexplained. Inspired by the phenomenon of “consensus of wills and coordination of activities” often observed in disaster risk management, we propose a new concept of network characteristic, the consilience degree (CSD), aiming to measure the way in which network topology and node activities together contribute to system outcomes. The CSD captures the fact that nodes may assume different states that make their activities more or less compatible. Connecting two nodes with in/compatible states will lead to outcomes that are un/desirable from the perspective of the SES in question. We mathematically prove that the CSD is a generalized CND, and the CND is a special case of CSD. As a general, fundamental concept, the CSD can facilitate the development of a new framework of network properties, models, and theories that allows us to understand patterns of network behavior that cannot be explained in terms of connectivity alone. We further demonstrate that a co-evolutionary mechanism can naturally improve the CSD. Given the generality of co-evolution in SES, we argue that the CSD is an inherent attribute rather than an artificial concept, which underpins the fundamental importance of the CSD to the study of SES.

AB - The complexity of social-ecological systems (SES) is rooted in the outcomes of node activities connected by network topology. Thus far, in network dynamics research, the connectivity degree (CND), indicating how many nodes are connected to a given node, has been the dominant concept. However, connectivity focuses only on network topology, neglecting the crucial relation to node activities, and thereby leaving system outcomes largely unexplained. Inspired by the phenomenon of “consensus of wills and coordination of activities” often observed in disaster risk management, we propose a new concept of network characteristic, the consilience degree (CSD), aiming to measure the way in which network topology and node activities together contribute to system outcomes. The CSD captures the fact that nodes may assume different states that make their activities more or less compatible. Connecting two nodes with in/compatible states will lead to outcomes that are un/desirable from the perspective of the SES in question. We mathematically prove that the CSD is a generalized CND, and the CND is a special case of CSD. As a general, fundamental concept, the CSD can facilitate the development of a new framework of network properties, models, and theories that allows us to understand patterns of network behavior that cannot be explained in terms of connectivity alone. We further demonstrate that a co-evolutionary mechanism can naturally improve the CSD. Given the generality of co-evolution in SES, we argue that the CSD is an inherent attribute rather than an artificial concept, which underpins the fundamental importance of the CSD to the study of SES.

KW - Co-evolution

KW - Complex networks

KW - Consilience degree

KW - Disaster risk reduction

KW - Social-ecological systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038887934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038887934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13753-017-0146-5

DO - 10.1007/s13753-017-0146-5

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 343

EP - 356

JO - International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

JF - International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

SN - 2095-0055

IS - 4

ER -