Towards an alignment of activities, aspirations and stakeholders for responsible innovation

Rider W. Foley, Michael J. Bernstein, Arnim Wiek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Governance of technological innovation remains challenged by the dilemma of control. Two divergent responses seek to meet this challenge. The first regulates negative impacts once evidence is gathered. The second precludes dissemination of technologies until enough is known about outcomes. Recognizing limitations of each response, scholars are increasingly exploring responsible innovation (RI), a concept that revolves around dimensions of anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness. At present, current conceptualizations of RI do not address questions of “to what end?” or “how to innovate responsibly?” This paper informs RI with sustainability principles and proposes an alignment of activities, aspirations, and stakeholders with previously defined dimensions for RI. A case study on nanotechnology innovation illustrates the applicability of this framework for assessing innovation governance. The proffered idea of alignment, buttressed by insights from sustainability and adaptive management, is intended to support the practice of RI by government agencies, industry, and diverse stakeholders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)209-232
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Responsible Innovation
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Innovation
Sustainable development
Alignment
Aspiration
Stakeholders
Nanotechnology
Industry
Governance

Keywords

  • emerging technologies
  • governance
  • Responsible innovation
  • sustainability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Information Systems and Management

Cite this

Towards an alignment of activities, aspirations and stakeholders for responsible innovation. / Foley, Rider W.; Bernstein, Michael J.; Wiek, Arnim.

In: Journal of Responsible Innovation, Vol. 3, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 209-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9103c660c36246cf923af951da23cb31,
title = "Towards an alignment of activities, aspirations and stakeholders for responsible innovation",
abstract = "Governance of technological innovation remains challenged by the dilemma of control. Two divergent responses seek to meet this challenge. The first regulates negative impacts once evidence is gathered. The second precludes dissemination of technologies until enough is known about outcomes. Recognizing limitations of each response, scholars are increasingly exploring responsible innovation (RI), a concept that revolves around dimensions of anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness. At present, current conceptualizations of RI do not address questions of “to what end?” or “how to innovate responsibly?” This paper informs RI with sustainability principles and proposes an alignment of activities, aspirations, and stakeholders with previously defined dimensions for RI. A case study on nanotechnology innovation illustrates the applicability of this framework for assessing innovation governance. The proffered idea of alignment, buttressed by insights from sustainability and adaptive management, is intended to support the practice of RI by government agencies, industry, and diverse stakeholders.",
keywords = "emerging technologies, governance, Responsible innovation, sustainability",
author = "Foley, {Rider W.} and Bernstein, {Michael J.} and Arnim Wiek",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/23299460.2016.1257380",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "209--232",
journal = "Journal of Responsible Innovation",
issn = "2329-9460",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards an alignment of activities, aspirations and stakeholders for responsible innovation

AU - Foley, Rider W.

AU - Bernstein, Michael J.

AU - Wiek, Arnim

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Governance of technological innovation remains challenged by the dilemma of control. Two divergent responses seek to meet this challenge. The first regulates negative impacts once evidence is gathered. The second precludes dissemination of technologies until enough is known about outcomes. Recognizing limitations of each response, scholars are increasingly exploring responsible innovation (RI), a concept that revolves around dimensions of anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness. At present, current conceptualizations of RI do not address questions of “to what end?” or “how to innovate responsibly?” This paper informs RI with sustainability principles and proposes an alignment of activities, aspirations, and stakeholders with previously defined dimensions for RI. A case study on nanotechnology innovation illustrates the applicability of this framework for assessing innovation governance. The proffered idea of alignment, buttressed by insights from sustainability and adaptive management, is intended to support the practice of RI by government agencies, industry, and diverse stakeholders.

AB - Governance of technological innovation remains challenged by the dilemma of control. Two divergent responses seek to meet this challenge. The first regulates negative impacts once evidence is gathered. The second precludes dissemination of technologies until enough is known about outcomes. Recognizing limitations of each response, scholars are increasingly exploring responsible innovation (RI), a concept that revolves around dimensions of anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness. At present, current conceptualizations of RI do not address questions of “to what end?” or “how to innovate responsibly?” This paper informs RI with sustainability principles and proposes an alignment of activities, aspirations, and stakeholders with previously defined dimensions for RI. A case study on nanotechnology innovation illustrates the applicability of this framework for assessing innovation governance. The proffered idea of alignment, buttressed by insights from sustainability and adaptive management, is intended to support the practice of RI by government agencies, industry, and diverse stakeholders.

KW - emerging technologies

KW - governance

KW - Responsible innovation

KW - sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013657053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013657053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23299460.2016.1257380

DO - 10.1080/23299460.2016.1257380

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 209

EP - 232

JO - Journal of Responsible Innovation

JF - Journal of Responsible Innovation

SN - 2329-9460

IS - 3

ER -