TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a unified model of event-related potentials as phases of stimulus-to-response processing
AU - Taylor, Brittany K.
AU - Gavin, William J.
AU - Grimm, Kevin J.
AU - Prince, Mark A.
AU - Lin, Mei Heng
AU - Davies, Patricia L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded in part by NIH / NICHD ( R03HD046512 ) to PLD and WJG, the Colorado State University College of Health and Human Sciences, and the Colorado State University Departments of Occupational Therapy, and Human Development and Family Studies. These data were analyzed as a portion of a doctoral dissertation effort.
Funding Information:
This study was funded in part by NIH/NICHD (R03HD046512) to PLD and WJG, the Colorado State University College of Health and Human Sciences, and the Colorado State University Departments of Occupational Therapy, and Human Development and Family Studies. These data were analyzed as a portion of a doctoral dissertation effort. We thank the research assistants in the Brainwaves Research Lab for all of their data collection efforts. We also want to thank the families who participated in this study for their valuable time and effort.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - This study demonstrates the utility of combining principles of connectionist theory with a sophisticated statistical approach, structural equation modeling (SEM), to better understand brain-behavior relationships in studies using event-related potentials (ERPs). The models show how sequential phases of neural processing measured by averaged ERP waveform components can successfully predict task behavior (response time; RT) while accounting for individual differences in maturation and sex. The models assume that all ERP measures are affected by individual differences in physical and mental state that inflate measurement error. ERP data were collected from 154 neurotypical children (7-13 years, M = 10.22, SD = 1.48; 74 males) performing a cued Go/No-Go task during two separate sessions. Using SEM, we show a latent variable path model with good fit (e.g., χ2(51) = 56.20, p = .25; RMSEA = .03; CFI = .99; SRMR = .06) yielding moderate-to-large predictive coefficients from N1 through the E-wave latent variables (N1 β = -.29 → P2 β = -.44 → N2 β = .28 → P3 β =.64→ E-wave), which in turn significantly predicted RT (β =.34, p = .02). Age significantly related to N1 and P3 latent variables as well as RT (β =.31, -.58, & -.40 respectively), and Sex significantly related to the E-wave latent variable and RT (β =.36 & 0.21 respectively). Additionally, the final model suggested that individual differences in emotional and physical state accounted for a significant proportion of variance in ERP measurements, and that individual states systematically varied across sessions (i.e., the variance was not just random noise). These findings suggest that modeling ERPs as a system of inter-related processes may be a more informative approach to examining brain-behavior relationships in neurotypical and clinical groups than traditional analysis techniques.
AB - This study demonstrates the utility of combining principles of connectionist theory with a sophisticated statistical approach, structural equation modeling (SEM), to better understand brain-behavior relationships in studies using event-related potentials (ERPs). The models show how sequential phases of neural processing measured by averaged ERP waveform components can successfully predict task behavior (response time; RT) while accounting for individual differences in maturation and sex. The models assume that all ERP measures are affected by individual differences in physical and mental state that inflate measurement error. ERP data were collected from 154 neurotypical children (7-13 years, M = 10.22, SD = 1.48; 74 males) performing a cued Go/No-Go task during two separate sessions. Using SEM, we show a latent variable path model with good fit (e.g., χ2(51) = 56.20, p = .25; RMSEA = .03; CFI = .99; SRMR = .06) yielding moderate-to-large predictive coefficients from N1 through the E-wave latent variables (N1 β = -.29 → P2 β = -.44 → N2 β = .28 → P3 β =.64→ E-wave), which in turn significantly predicted RT (β =.34, p = .02). Age significantly related to N1 and P3 latent variables as well as RT (β =.31, -.58, & -.40 respectively), and Sex significantly related to the E-wave latent variable and RT (β =.36 & 0.21 respectively). Additionally, the final model suggested that individual differences in emotional and physical state accounted for a significant proportion of variance in ERP measurements, and that individual states systematically varied across sessions (i.e., the variance was not just random noise). These findings suggest that modeling ERPs as a system of inter-related processes may be a more informative approach to examining brain-behavior relationships in neurotypical and clinical groups than traditional analysis techniques.
KW - Development
KW - Event-related potentials (ERPs)
KW - Individual differences
KW - Structural equation modeling (SEM)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067852076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067852076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107128
DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107128
M3 - Article
C2 - 31229538
AN - SCOPUS:85067852076
SN - 0028-3932
VL - 132
JO - Neuropsychologia
JF - Neuropsychologia
M1 - 107128
ER -