Abstract

The evolution of agricultural economies requires two processes: (1) the domestication of plants and (2) specialization in agricultural practices at the expense of alternative subsistence pursuits. Yet, in the literature, domestication receives the lion's share of attention while theories of specialization lag behind. In this paper, we integrate ideas from human behavioral ecology (HBE) with tools from dynamical systems theory to study the effects of ecological inheritance on levels of investment in foraging and farming. Ecological inheritance is an outcome of niche construction and our study provides a formal link between foraging theory and niche construction. Our analysis of a dynamic model of foraging and farming illustrates that the optimal allocation of effort to foraging and farming can lead to the emergence of multiple stable states. The consequence of this is that low-level farming optimizes subsistence (e.g., minimizing the effort required to meet a subsistence goal) in a forager-resource system over a few years, but makes the whole system vulnerable to punctuated change over decades due to rare events. We use the insights of our model to propose a general ecological framework to explain the evolution and diversity of transitions from foraging to farming.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-122
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Anthropological Archaeology
Volume40
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

specialization
System theory
Ecology
system theory
ecology
Dynamic models
Dynamical systems
agriculture
event
resources
Farming
Foraging
Subsistence
literature
Domestication
Niche Construction

Keywords

  • Agricultural change
  • Foraging theory
  • Human behavioral ecology
  • Niche construction
  • Resilience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Archaeology
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Archaeology

Cite this

Toward a theory of non-linear transitions from foraging to farming. / Freeman, Jacob; Peeples, Matthew; Anderies, John.

In: Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, Vol. 40, 01.12.2015, p. 109-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c3d7ac303ff54089832fc0397de691ac,
title = "Toward a theory of non-linear transitions from foraging to farming",
abstract = "The evolution of agricultural economies requires two processes: (1) the domestication of plants and (2) specialization in agricultural practices at the expense of alternative subsistence pursuits. Yet, in the literature, domestication receives the lion's share of attention while theories of specialization lag behind. In this paper, we integrate ideas from human behavioral ecology (HBE) with tools from dynamical systems theory to study the effects of ecological inheritance on levels of investment in foraging and farming. Ecological inheritance is an outcome of niche construction and our study provides a formal link between foraging theory and niche construction. Our analysis of a dynamic model of foraging and farming illustrates that the optimal allocation of effort to foraging and farming can lead to the emergence of multiple stable states. The consequence of this is that low-level farming optimizes subsistence (e.g., minimizing the effort required to meet a subsistence goal) in a forager-resource system over a few years, but makes the whole system vulnerable to punctuated change over decades due to rare events. We use the insights of our model to propose a general ecological framework to explain the evolution and diversity of transitions from foraging to farming.",
keywords = "Agricultural change, Foraging theory, Human behavioral ecology, Niche construction, Resilience",
author = "Jacob Freeman and Matthew Peeples and John Anderies",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaa.2015.07.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "109--122",
journal = "Journal of Anthropological Archaeology",
issn = "0278-4165",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a theory of non-linear transitions from foraging to farming

AU - Freeman, Jacob

AU - Peeples, Matthew

AU - Anderies, John

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - The evolution of agricultural economies requires two processes: (1) the domestication of plants and (2) specialization in agricultural practices at the expense of alternative subsistence pursuits. Yet, in the literature, domestication receives the lion's share of attention while theories of specialization lag behind. In this paper, we integrate ideas from human behavioral ecology (HBE) with tools from dynamical systems theory to study the effects of ecological inheritance on levels of investment in foraging and farming. Ecological inheritance is an outcome of niche construction and our study provides a formal link between foraging theory and niche construction. Our analysis of a dynamic model of foraging and farming illustrates that the optimal allocation of effort to foraging and farming can lead to the emergence of multiple stable states. The consequence of this is that low-level farming optimizes subsistence (e.g., minimizing the effort required to meet a subsistence goal) in a forager-resource system over a few years, but makes the whole system vulnerable to punctuated change over decades due to rare events. We use the insights of our model to propose a general ecological framework to explain the evolution and diversity of transitions from foraging to farming.

AB - The evolution of agricultural economies requires two processes: (1) the domestication of plants and (2) specialization in agricultural practices at the expense of alternative subsistence pursuits. Yet, in the literature, domestication receives the lion's share of attention while theories of specialization lag behind. In this paper, we integrate ideas from human behavioral ecology (HBE) with tools from dynamical systems theory to study the effects of ecological inheritance on levels of investment in foraging and farming. Ecological inheritance is an outcome of niche construction and our study provides a formal link between foraging theory and niche construction. Our analysis of a dynamic model of foraging and farming illustrates that the optimal allocation of effort to foraging and farming can lead to the emergence of multiple stable states. The consequence of this is that low-level farming optimizes subsistence (e.g., minimizing the effort required to meet a subsistence goal) in a forager-resource system over a few years, but makes the whole system vulnerable to punctuated change over decades due to rare events. We use the insights of our model to propose a general ecological framework to explain the evolution and diversity of transitions from foraging to farming.

KW - Agricultural change

KW - Foraging theory

KW - Human behavioral ecology

KW - Niche construction

KW - Resilience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938254835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938254835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaa.2015.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jaa.2015.07.001

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 109

EP - 122

JO - Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

JF - Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

SN - 0278-4165

ER -