Toward a better bioethics: Commentary on "Orbidding science: Some beginning reflections"

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has been argued that bioethicists too often tend to represent the interests of scientists and not of the broader polity. Indeed, bioethicists seem predisposed to discard the voices and viewpoints of all but the cognoscenti. Focusing particularly on human pluripotent stem cell research, this commentary explores a variety of characterizations of bioethics and bioethicists in relation to forbidding science. Rather than proselytizing or prohibiting, bioethicists should work in partnership with scientists and publics to craft scientifically well-informed and morally sophisticated debates about forbidding science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-291
Number of pages9
JournalScience and Engineering Ethics
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Ethicists
Bioethics
Stem Cells
bioethics
Stem cells
Tend
stem cell research
science
Stem Cell Research
Pluripotent Stem Cells
Voice
Human
Partnership
Stem cell research
Discards

Keywords

  • Controversy
  • Deliberation
  • Expertise
  • Human pluripotent stem cell research
  • Moral architecture
  • President's Council on Bioethics
  • Public engagement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Toward a better bioethics : Commentary on "Orbidding science: Some beginning reflections". / Robert, Jason.

In: Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2009, p. 283-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f62bfaa18512428ab1b507762eb02e8c,
title = "Toward a better bioethics: Commentary on {"}Orbidding science: Some beginning reflections{"}",
abstract = "It has been argued that bioethicists too often tend to represent the interests of scientists and not of the broader polity. Indeed, bioethicists seem predisposed to discard the voices and viewpoints of all but the cognoscenti. Focusing particularly on human pluripotent stem cell research, this commentary explores a variety of characterizations of bioethics and bioethicists in relation to forbidding science. Rather than proselytizing or prohibiting, bioethicists should work in partnership with scientists and publics to craft scientifically well-informed and morally sophisticated debates about forbidding science.",
keywords = "Controversy, Deliberation, Expertise, Human pluripotent stem cell research, Moral architecture, President's Council on Bioethics, Public engagement",
author = "Jason Robert",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1007/s11948-009-9134-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "283--291",
journal = "Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics",
issn = "1660-5446",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a better bioethics

T2 - Commentary on "Orbidding science: Some beginning reflections"

AU - Robert, Jason

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - It has been argued that bioethicists too often tend to represent the interests of scientists and not of the broader polity. Indeed, bioethicists seem predisposed to discard the voices and viewpoints of all but the cognoscenti. Focusing particularly on human pluripotent stem cell research, this commentary explores a variety of characterizations of bioethics and bioethicists in relation to forbidding science. Rather than proselytizing or prohibiting, bioethicists should work in partnership with scientists and publics to craft scientifically well-informed and morally sophisticated debates about forbidding science.

AB - It has been argued that bioethicists too often tend to represent the interests of scientists and not of the broader polity. Indeed, bioethicists seem predisposed to discard the voices and viewpoints of all but the cognoscenti. Focusing particularly on human pluripotent stem cell research, this commentary explores a variety of characterizations of bioethics and bioethicists in relation to forbidding science. Rather than proselytizing or prohibiting, bioethicists should work in partnership with scientists and publics to craft scientifically well-informed and morally sophisticated debates about forbidding science.

KW - Controversy

KW - Deliberation

KW - Expertise

KW - Human pluripotent stem cell research

KW - Moral architecture

KW - President's Council on Bioethics

KW - Public engagement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349897100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349897100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11948-009-9134-5

DO - 10.1007/s11948-009-9134-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 19421896

AN - SCOPUS:70349897100

VL - 15

SP - 283

EP - 291

JO - Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics

JF - Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics

SN - 1660-5446

IS - 3

ER -