Torture allegations as events data: Introducing the Ill-Treatment and Torture (ITT) specific allegation data

Courtenay R. Conrad, Jillienne Haglund, Will H. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Ill-Treatment and Torture (ITT) Data Collection Project uses content analysis to measure a number of variables on more than 15,000 public allegations of government ill-treatment and torture made by Amnesty International (AI) from 1995 to 2005. The ITT specific allegation (SA) event data use the torture allegation as the unit of observation, thus permitting users to manipulate them for a wide variety of purposes. In this article, we introduce the ITT SA data. We first describe the key variables in the SA data and report a number of bivariate descriptive statistics to illustrate some of the research questions that might be usefully investigated with the data. We then discuss how we believe the ITT SA data can be used to study not only AI's naming and shaming behavior, but also states' (lack of) compliance with the United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT). We conclude with an empirical analysis using the SA data that investigates the effect of domestic political institutions on formal complaints, investigations, and adjudication of torture allegations. We show that legislative checks are positively associated with complaints, investigations, and trials; elections and freedom of speech are positively associated with investigations and trials; and powerful judiciaries are associated only with investigations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)429-438
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Peace Research
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

torture
Statistics
event
complaint
Amnesty International
freedom of opinion
Compliance
artificial intelligence
political institution
descriptive statistics
UNO
content analysis
election
lack

Keywords

  • data collection
  • human rights
  • torture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Safety Research

Cite this

Torture allegations as events data : Introducing the Ill-Treatment and Torture (ITT) specific allegation data. / Conrad, Courtenay R.; Haglund, Jillienne; Moore, Will H.

In: Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2014, p. 429-438.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Conrad, Courtenay R. ; Haglund, Jillienne ; Moore, Will H. / Torture allegations as events data : Introducing the Ill-Treatment and Torture (ITT) specific allegation data. In: Journal of Peace Research. 2014 ; Vol. 51, No. 3. pp. 429-438.
@article{cdf589fd4bb842e1aaa8fdda0bff1f37,
title = "Torture allegations as events data: Introducing the Ill-Treatment and Torture (ITT) specific allegation data",
abstract = "The Ill-Treatment and Torture (ITT) Data Collection Project uses content analysis to measure a number of variables on more than 15,000 public allegations of government ill-treatment and torture made by Amnesty International (AI) from 1995 to 2005. The ITT specific allegation (SA) event data use the torture allegation as the unit of observation, thus permitting users to manipulate them for a wide variety of purposes. In this article, we introduce the ITT SA data. We first describe the key variables in the SA data and report a number of bivariate descriptive statistics to illustrate some of the research questions that might be usefully investigated with the data. We then discuss how we believe the ITT SA data can be used to study not only AI's naming and shaming behavior, but also states' (lack of) compliance with the United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT). We conclude with an empirical analysis using the SA data that investigates the effect of domestic political institutions on formal complaints, investigations, and adjudication of torture allegations. We show that legislative checks are positively associated with complaints, investigations, and trials; elections and freedom of speech are positively associated with investigations and trials; and powerful judiciaries are associated only with investigations.",
keywords = "data collection, human rights, torture",
author = "Conrad, {Courtenay R.} and Jillienne Haglund and Moore, {Will H.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0022343314524427",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "429--438",
journal = "Journal of Peace Research",
issn = "0022-3433",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Torture allegations as events data

T2 - Introducing the Ill-Treatment and Torture (ITT) specific allegation data

AU - Conrad, Courtenay R.

AU - Haglund, Jillienne

AU - Moore, Will H.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The Ill-Treatment and Torture (ITT) Data Collection Project uses content analysis to measure a number of variables on more than 15,000 public allegations of government ill-treatment and torture made by Amnesty International (AI) from 1995 to 2005. The ITT specific allegation (SA) event data use the torture allegation as the unit of observation, thus permitting users to manipulate them for a wide variety of purposes. In this article, we introduce the ITT SA data. We first describe the key variables in the SA data and report a number of bivariate descriptive statistics to illustrate some of the research questions that might be usefully investigated with the data. We then discuss how we believe the ITT SA data can be used to study not only AI's naming and shaming behavior, but also states' (lack of) compliance with the United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT). We conclude with an empirical analysis using the SA data that investigates the effect of domestic political institutions on formal complaints, investigations, and adjudication of torture allegations. We show that legislative checks are positively associated with complaints, investigations, and trials; elections and freedom of speech are positively associated with investigations and trials; and powerful judiciaries are associated only with investigations.

AB - The Ill-Treatment and Torture (ITT) Data Collection Project uses content analysis to measure a number of variables on more than 15,000 public allegations of government ill-treatment and torture made by Amnesty International (AI) from 1995 to 2005. The ITT specific allegation (SA) event data use the torture allegation as the unit of observation, thus permitting users to manipulate them for a wide variety of purposes. In this article, we introduce the ITT SA data. We first describe the key variables in the SA data and report a number of bivariate descriptive statistics to illustrate some of the research questions that might be usefully investigated with the data. We then discuss how we believe the ITT SA data can be used to study not only AI's naming and shaming behavior, but also states' (lack of) compliance with the United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT). We conclude with an empirical analysis using the SA data that investigates the effect of domestic political institutions on formal complaints, investigations, and adjudication of torture allegations. We show that legislative checks are positively associated with complaints, investigations, and trials; elections and freedom of speech are positively associated with investigations and trials; and powerful judiciaries are associated only with investigations.

KW - data collection

KW - human rights

KW - torture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899964924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899964924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022343314524427

DO - 10.1177/0022343314524427

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84899964924

VL - 51

SP - 429

EP - 438

JO - Journal of Peace Research

JF - Journal of Peace Research

SN - 0022-3433

IS - 3

ER -