Topology optimization of structural systems considering both compliance and input observability

Yi Ren, Houpu Yao, Xinfan Lin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Recent advances in flexible and wireless sensors, soft materials, and additive manufacturing, have stimulated demands for developing intelligent systems that can achieve multidisciplinary objectives (e.g., mechanical strength, thermal conductivity, state and input estimation, controllability, and others). Existing studies often decouple these objectives through sub-system level design, e.g., topology and material design for mechanical and thermal properties, and filter and sensor/actuator design for observability and controllability, assuming that the sub-systems have minimal influences to each others. To investigate the validity of this assumption, we take a unique angle at studying how the topology of the system influences both structural performance (e.g., compliance under static loads) and input observability (e.g., the error in estimating the loads). We reveal a tradeoff between these two objectives and derive the Pareto frontier with respect to the topology. This preliminary result suggests the necessity of a multiobjective formulation for designing intelligent structures, when significant tradeoffs among system objectives exist.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationMechatronics; Estimation and Identification; Uncertain Systems and Robustness; Path Planning and Motion Control; Tracking Control Systems; Multi-Agent and Networked Systems; Manufacturing; Intelligent Transportation and Vehicles; Sensors and Actuators; Diagnostics and Detection; Unmanned, Ground and Surface Robotics; Motion and Vibration Control Applications
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers
Volume2
ISBN (Electronic)9780791858288
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
EventASME 2017 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, DSCC 2017 - Tysons, United States
Duration: Oct 11 2017Oct 13 2017

Other

OtherASME 2017 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, DSCC 2017
CountryUnited States
CityTysons
Period10/11/1710/13/17

Fingerprint

Observability
Shape optimization
Topology
Controllability
3D printers
Intelligent structures
Sensors
Intelligent systems
Strength of materials
Thermal conductivity
Actuators
Thermodynamic properties
Mechanical properties
Compliance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Ren, Y., Yao, H., & Lin, X. (2017). Topology optimization of structural systems considering both compliance and input observability. In Mechatronics; Estimation and Identification; Uncertain Systems and Robustness; Path Planning and Motion Control; Tracking Control Systems; Multi-Agent and Networked Systems; Manufacturing; Intelligent Transportation and Vehicles; Sensors and Actuators; Diagnostics and Detection; Unmanned, Ground and Surface Robotics; Motion and Vibration Control Applications (Vol. 2). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/DSCC2017-5236

Topology optimization of structural systems considering both compliance and input observability. / Ren, Yi; Yao, Houpu; Lin, Xinfan.

Mechatronics; Estimation and Identification; Uncertain Systems and Robustness; Path Planning and Motion Control; Tracking Control Systems; Multi-Agent and Networked Systems; Manufacturing; Intelligent Transportation and Vehicles; Sensors and Actuators; Diagnostics and Detection; Unmanned, Ground and Surface Robotics; Motion and Vibration Control Applications. Vol. 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Ren, Y, Yao, H & Lin, X 2017, Topology optimization of structural systems considering both compliance and input observability. in Mechatronics; Estimation and Identification; Uncertain Systems and Robustness; Path Planning and Motion Control; Tracking Control Systems; Multi-Agent and Networked Systems; Manufacturing; Intelligent Transportation and Vehicles; Sensors and Actuators; Diagnostics and Detection; Unmanned, Ground and Surface Robotics; Motion and Vibration Control Applications. vol. 2, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME 2017 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, DSCC 2017, Tysons, United States, 10/11/17. https://doi.org/10.1115/DSCC2017-5236
Ren Y, Yao H, Lin X. Topology optimization of structural systems considering both compliance and input observability. In Mechatronics; Estimation and Identification; Uncertain Systems and Robustness; Path Planning and Motion Control; Tracking Control Systems; Multi-Agent and Networked Systems; Manufacturing; Intelligent Transportation and Vehicles; Sensors and Actuators; Diagnostics and Detection; Unmanned, Ground and Surface Robotics; Motion and Vibration Control Applications. Vol. 2. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 2017 https://doi.org/10.1115/DSCC2017-5236
Ren, Yi ; Yao, Houpu ; Lin, Xinfan. / Topology optimization of structural systems considering both compliance and input observability. Mechatronics; Estimation and Identification; Uncertain Systems and Robustness; Path Planning and Motion Control; Tracking Control Systems; Multi-Agent and Networked Systems; Manufacturing; Intelligent Transportation and Vehicles; Sensors and Actuators; Diagnostics and Detection; Unmanned, Ground and Surface Robotics; Motion and Vibration Control Applications. Vol. 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017.
@inproceedings{745fcea2cf7d44b3b7c74873db3ae700,
title = "Topology optimization of structural systems considering both compliance and input observability",
abstract = "Recent advances in flexible and wireless sensors, soft materials, and additive manufacturing, have stimulated demands for developing intelligent systems that can achieve multidisciplinary objectives (e.g., mechanical strength, thermal conductivity, state and input estimation, controllability, and others). Existing studies often decouple these objectives through sub-system level design, e.g., topology and material design for mechanical and thermal properties, and filter and sensor/actuator design for observability and controllability, assuming that the sub-systems have minimal influences to each others. To investigate the validity of this assumption, we take a unique angle at studying how the topology of the system influences both structural performance (e.g., compliance under static loads) and input observability (e.g., the error in estimating the loads). We reveal a tradeoff between these two objectives and derive the Pareto frontier with respect to the topology. This preliminary result suggests the necessity of a multiobjective formulation for designing intelligent structures, when significant tradeoffs among system objectives exist.",
author = "Yi Ren and Houpu Yao and Xinfan Lin",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/DSCC2017-5236",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
booktitle = "Mechatronics; Estimation and Identification; Uncertain Systems and Robustness; Path Planning and Motion Control; Tracking Control Systems; Multi-Agent and Networked Systems; Manufacturing; Intelligent Transportation and Vehicles; Sensors and Actuators; Diagnostics and Detection; Unmanned, Ground and Surface Robotics; Motion and Vibration Control Applications",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Topology optimization of structural systems considering both compliance and input observability

AU - Ren, Yi

AU - Yao, Houpu

AU - Lin, Xinfan

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Recent advances in flexible and wireless sensors, soft materials, and additive manufacturing, have stimulated demands for developing intelligent systems that can achieve multidisciplinary objectives (e.g., mechanical strength, thermal conductivity, state and input estimation, controllability, and others). Existing studies often decouple these objectives through sub-system level design, e.g., topology and material design for mechanical and thermal properties, and filter and sensor/actuator design for observability and controllability, assuming that the sub-systems have minimal influences to each others. To investigate the validity of this assumption, we take a unique angle at studying how the topology of the system influences both structural performance (e.g., compliance under static loads) and input observability (e.g., the error in estimating the loads). We reveal a tradeoff between these two objectives and derive the Pareto frontier with respect to the topology. This preliminary result suggests the necessity of a multiobjective formulation for designing intelligent structures, when significant tradeoffs among system objectives exist.

AB - Recent advances in flexible and wireless sensors, soft materials, and additive manufacturing, have stimulated demands for developing intelligent systems that can achieve multidisciplinary objectives (e.g., mechanical strength, thermal conductivity, state and input estimation, controllability, and others). Existing studies often decouple these objectives through sub-system level design, e.g., topology and material design for mechanical and thermal properties, and filter and sensor/actuator design for observability and controllability, assuming that the sub-systems have minimal influences to each others. To investigate the validity of this assumption, we take a unique angle at studying how the topology of the system influences both structural performance (e.g., compliance under static loads) and input observability (e.g., the error in estimating the loads). We reveal a tradeoff between these two objectives and derive the Pareto frontier with respect to the topology. This preliminary result suggests the necessity of a multiobjective formulation for designing intelligent structures, when significant tradeoffs among system objectives exist.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036625432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85036625432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/DSCC2017-5236

DO - 10.1115/DSCC2017-5236

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 2

BT - Mechatronics; Estimation and Identification; Uncertain Systems and Robustness; Path Planning and Motion Control; Tracking Control Systems; Multi-Agent and Networked Systems; Manufacturing; Intelligent Transportation and Vehicles; Sensors and Actuators; Diagnostics and Detection; Unmanned, Ground and Surface Robotics; Motion and Vibration Control Applications

PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers

ER -