"To not hate"

Reconciliation among victims of violence and participants of the greensboro truth and reconciliation commission

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission (GTRC) was an intervention promoting reconciliation among the victims and community affected by the 1979 Greensboro Massacre in North Carolina. An exploratory qualitative research design was used, in which in-depth, open-ended interviews were conducted with victims of the Greensboro Massacre who subsequently participated in the GTRC (n = 17). Findings revealed a typology of reconciliation that includes cognitive-affective, behavioral and social reconciliation. Respondents displayed different orientations in how they prioritized reconciliation with the twin goals of seeking truth and justice. The GTRC did contribute to interpersonal reconciliation, and can be a useful model of communities working to recover from violence. The cognitive-affective, behavioral and social typology of reconciliation can be used to assess other interventions aimed at promoting reconciliation. Individuals' personal orientations towards reconciliation can also be used to explain different reactions among people to restorative justice efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-285
Number of pages17
JournalContemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

hate
reconciliation
violence
massacre
typology
justice
research planning
community
qualitative research

Keywords

  • Greensboro
  • Reconciliation
  • Restorative justice
  • Truth and reconciliation commissions
  • Victims

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

@article{7786b4fe1e4d479d906097727fa14432,
title = "{"}To not hate{"}: Reconciliation among victims of violence and participants of the greensboro truth and reconciliation commission",
abstract = "The Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission (GTRC) was an intervention promoting reconciliation among the victims and community affected by the 1979 Greensboro Massacre in North Carolina. An exploratory qualitative research design was used, in which in-depth, open-ended interviews were conducted with victims of the Greensboro Massacre who subsequently participated in the GTRC (n = 17). Findings revealed a typology of reconciliation that includes cognitive-affective, behavioral and social reconciliation. Respondents displayed different orientations in how they prioritized reconciliation with the twin goals of seeking truth and justice. The GTRC did contribute to interpersonal reconciliation, and can be a useful model of communities working to recover from violence. The cognitive-affective, behavioral and social typology of reconciliation can be used to assess other interventions aimed at promoting reconciliation. Individuals' personal orientations towards reconciliation can also be used to explain different reactions among people to restorative justice efforts.",
keywords = "Greensboro, Reconciliation, Restorative justice, Truth and reconciliation commissions, Victims",
author = "David Androff",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/10282580.2010.498226",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "269--285",
journal = "Contemporary Justice Review",
issn = "1028-2580",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "To not hate"

T2 - Reconciliation among victims of violence and participants of the greensboro truth and reconciliation commission

AU - Androff, David

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - The Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission (GTRC) was an intervention promoting reconciliation among the victims and community affected by the 1979 Greensboro Massacre in North Carolina. An exploratory qualitative research design was used, in which in-depth, open-ended interviews were conducted with victims of the Greensboro Massacre who subsequently participated in the GTRC (n = 17). Findings revealed a typology of reconciliation that includes cognitive-affective, behavioral and social reconciliation. Respondents displayed different orientations in how they prioritized reconciliation with the twin goals of seeking truth and justice. The GTRC did contribute to interpersonal reconciliation, and can be a useful model of communities working to recover from violence. The cognitive-affective, behavioral and social typology of reconciliation can be used to assess other interventions aimed at promoting reconciliation. Individuals' personal orientations towards reconciliation can also be used to explain different reactions among people to restorative justice efforts.

AB - The Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission (GTRC) was an intervention promoting reconciliation among the victims and community affected by the 1979 Greensboro Massacre in North Carolina. An exploratory qualitative research design was used, in which in-depth, open-ended interviews were conducted with victims of the Greensboro Massacre who subsequently participated in the GTRC (n = 17). Findings revealed a typology of reconciliation that includes cognitive-affective, behavioral and social reconciliation. Respondents displayed different orientations in how they prioritized reconciliation with the twin goals of seeking truth and justice. The GTRC did contribute to interpersonal reconciliation, and can be a useful model of communities working to recover from violence. The cognitive-affective, behavioral and social typology of reconciliation can be used to assess other interventions aimed at promoting reconciliation. Individuals' personal orientations towards reconciliation can also be used to explain different reactions among people to restorative justice efforts.

KW - Greensboro

KW - Reconciliation

KW - Restorative justice

KW - Truth and reconciliation commissions

KW - Victims

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956185808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956185808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10282580.2010.498226

DO - 10.1080/10282580.2010.498226

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 269

EP - 285

JO - Contemporary Justice Review

JF - Contemporary Justice Review

SN - 1028-2580

IS - 3

ER -