To match or not to match: Effects of behavioral congruence on interpersonal connectedness

Kory Floyd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined interactions among 96 American college students and tested the prediction that adaptation patterns influence perceptions of interpersonal connectedness. It was proposed that matching positive behavior and not matching negative behavior is interpreted as communicating the most connectedness. Matching negative behavior and not matching positive behavior carries the opposite connotative meaning. These predictions were partially supported. Although the interaction of adaptation and the valence of the stimulus behavior affected the students' encoded meanings of connectedness, it did not influence the extent to which receivers actually felt more connected to senders. This finding suggests the importance of examining multiple perspectives in interaction research rather than presuming that any 1 perspective accurately characterizes the dyad or group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-322
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Social Psychology
Volume139
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Students
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

To match or not to match : Effects of behavioral congruence on interpersonal connectedness. / Floyd, Kory.

In: Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 139, No. 3, 06.1999, p. 309-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d14b3a922b584a40a365a0dfb506758b,
title = "To match or not to match: Effects of behavioral congruence on interpersonal connectedness",
abstract = "This study examined interactions among 96 American college students and tested the prediction that adaptation patterns influence perceptions of interpersonal connectedness. It was proposed that matching positive behavior and not matching negative behavior is interpreted as communicating the most connectedness. Matching negative behavior and not matching positive behavior carries the opposite connotative meaning. These predictions were partially supported. Although the interaction of adaptation and the valence of the stimulus behavior affected the students' encoded meanings of connectedness, it did not influence the extent to which receivers actually felt more connected to senders. This finding suggests the importance of examining multiple perspectives in interaction research rather than presuming that any 1 perspective accurately characterizes the dyad or group.",
author = "Kory Floyd",
year = "1999",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "139",
pages = "309--322",
journal = "Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-4545",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - To match or not to match

T2 - Effects of behavioral congruence on interpersonal connectedness

AU - Floyd, Kory

PY - 1999/6

Y1 - 1999/6

N2 - This study examined interactions among 96 American college students and tested the prediction that adaptation patterns influence perceptions of interpersonal connectedness. It was proposed that matching positive behavior and not matching negative behavior is interpreted as communicating the most connectedness. Matching negative behavior and not matching positive behavior carries the opposite connotative meaning. These predictions were partially supported. Although the interaction of adaptation and the valence of the stimulus behavior affected the students' encoded meanings of connectedness, it did not influence the extent to which receivers actually felt more connected to senders. This finding suggests the importance of examining multiple perspectives in interaction research rather than presuming that any 1 perspective accurately characterizes the dyad or group.

AB - This study examined interactions among 96 American college students and tested the prediction that adaptation patterns influence perceptions of interpersonal connectedness. It was proposed that matching positive behavior and not matching negative behavior is interpreted as communicating the most connectedness. Matching negative behavior and not matching positive behavior carries the opposite connotative meaning. These predictions were partially supported. Although the interaction of adaptation and the valence of the stimulus behavior affected the students' encoded meanings of connectedness, it did not influence the extent to which receivers actually felt more connected to senders. This finding suggests the importance of examining multiple perspectives in interaction research rather than presuming that any 1 perspective accurately characterizes the dyad or group.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033441032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033441032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033441032

VL - 139

SP - 309

EP - 322

JO - Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0022-4545

IS - 3

ER -