10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As decision-makers increasingly embrace life-cycle assessment (LCA) and target transportation services for regional environmental goals, it becomes imperative that outcomes from changes to transportation infrastructure systems are accurately estimated. Greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction policies have created interest in better understanding how public transit systems reduce emissions. Yet the use of average emission factors (e.g., grams CO2e per distance traveled) persists as the state-of-the-art masking the variations in emissions across time, and confounding the ability to accurately estimate the environmental effects from changes to transit infrastructure and travel behavior. An LCA is developed of the Expo light rail line and a competing car trip (in Los Angeles, California) that includes vehicle, infrastructure, and energy production processes, in addition to propulsion. When results are normalized per passenger kilometer traveled (PKT), life-cycle processes increase energy use and GHG emissions up to 83%, and up to 690% for smog and respiratory impact potentials. However, the use of a time-independent PKT normalization obfuscates a decision-maker's ability to understand whether the deployment of a transit system reduces emissions below a future year policy target (e.g., 80% of 1990 emissions by 2050). The year-by-year marginal effects of the decision to deploy the Expo line are developed including reductions in automobile travel. The time-based marginal results provide clearer explanations for how environmental effects in a region change and the critical life-cycle processes that should be targeted to achieve policy targets. It shows when environmental impacts payback and how much reduction is achieved by a policy-specified future year.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-58
Number of pages10
JournalTransportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Volume43
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

life cycle assessment
Greenhouse gases
Life cycle
greenhouse gas
life cycle
Environmental impact
environmental effect
infrastructure
automobile
decision maker
transportation infrastructure
Gas emissions
travel behavior
smog
Propulsion
Automobiles
Rails
energy production
energy use
Railroad cars

Keywords

  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Greenhouse gas emissions
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Light rail
  • Policymaking
  • Transit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Transportation

Cite this

@article{dffd71bf7b1c40fd972a0fd8d813f36a,
title = "Time-based life-cycle assessment for environmental policymaking: Greenhouse gas reduction goals and public transit",
abstract = "As decision-makers increasingly embrace life-cycle assessment (LCA) and target transportation services for regional environmental goals, it becomes imperative that outcomes from changes to transportation infrastructure systems are accurately estimated. Greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction policies have created interest in better understanding how public transit systems reduce emissions. Yet the use of average emission factors (e.g., grams CO2e per distance traveled) persists as the state-of-the-art masking the variations in emissions across time, and confounding the ability to accurately estimate the environmental effects from changes to transit infrastructure and travel behavior. An LCA is developed of the Expo light rail line and a competing car trip (in Los Angeles, California) that includes vehicle, infrastructure, and energy production processes, in addition to propulsion. When results are normalized per passenger kilometer traveled (PKT), life-cycle processes increase energy use and GHG emissions up to 83{\%}, and up to 690{\%} for smog and respiratory impact potentials. However, the use of a time-independent PKT normalization obfuscates a decision-maker's ability to understand whether the deployment of a transit system reduces emissions below a future year policy target (e.g., 80{\%} of 1990 emissions by 2050). The year-by-year marginal effects of the decision to deploy the Expo line are developed including reductions in automobile travel. The time-based marginal results provide clearer explanations for how environmental effects in a region change and the critical life-cycle processes that should be targeted to achieve policy targets. It shows when environmental impacts payback and how much reduction is achieved by a policy-specified future year.",
keywords = "Energy, Environment, Greenhouse gas emissions, Life cycle assessment, Light rail, Policymaking, Transit",
author = "Mikhail Chester and Alex Cano",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "49--58",
journal = "Transportation Research, Part D: Transport and Environment",
issn = "1361-9209",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time-based life-cycle assessment for environmental policymaking

T2 - Greenhouse gas reduction goals and public transit

AU - Chester, Mikhail

AU - Cano, Alex

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - As decision-makers increasingly embrace life-cycle assessment (LCA) and target transportation services for regional environmental goals, it becomes imperative that outcomes from changes to transportation infrastructure systems are accurately estimated. Greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction policies have created interest in better understanding how public transit systems reduce emissions. Yet the use of average emission factors (e.g., grams CO2e per distance traveled) persists as the state-of-the-art masking the variations in emissions across time, and confounding the ability to accurately estimate the environmental effects from changes to transit infrastructure and travel behavior. An LCA is developed of the Expo light rail line and a competing car trip (in Los Angeles, California) that includes vehicle, infrastructure, and energy production processes, in addition to propulsion. When results are normalized per passenger kilometer traveled (PKT), life-cycle processes increase energy use and GHG emissions up to 83%, and up to 690% for smog and respiratory impact potentials. However, the use of a time-independent PKT normalization obfuscates a decision-maker's ability to understand whether the deployment of a transit system reduces emissions below a future year policy target (e.g., 80% of 1990 emissions by 2050). The year-by-year marginal effects of the decision to deploy the Expo line are developed including reductions in automobile travel. The time-based marginal results provide clearer explanations for how environmental effects in a region change and the critical life-cycle processes that should be targeted to achieve policy targets. It shows when environmental impacts payback and how much reduction is achieved by a policy-specified future year.

AB - As decision-makers increasingly embrace life-cycle assessment (LCA) and target transportation services for regional environmental goals, it becomes imperative that outcomes from changes to transportation infrastructure systems are accurately estimated. Greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction policies have created interest in better understanding how public transit systems reduce emissions. Yet the use of average emission factors (e.g., grams CO2e per distance traveled) persists as the state-of-the-art masking the variations in emissions across time, and confounding the ability to accurately estimate the environmental effects from changes to transit infrastructure and travel behavior. An LCA is developed of the Expo light rail line and a competing car trip (in Los Angeles, California) that includes vehicle, infrastructure, and energy production processes, in addition to propulsion. When results are normalized per passenger kilometer traveled (PKT), life-cycle processes increase energy use and GHG emissions up to 83%, and up to 690% for smog and respiratory impact potentials. However, the use of a time-independent PKT normalization obfuscates a decision-maker's ability to understand whether the deployment of a transit system reduces emissions below a future year policy target (e.g., 80% of 1990 emissions by 2050). The year-by-year marginal effects of the decision to deploy the Expo line are developed including reductions in automobile travel. The time-based marginal results provide clearer explanations for how environmental effects in a region change and the critical life-cycle processes that should be targeted to achieve policy targets. It shows when environmental impacts payback and how much reduction is achieved by a policy-specified future year.

KW - Energy

KW - Environment

KW - Greenhouse gas emissions

KW - Life cycle assessment

KW - Light rail

KW - Policymaking

KW - Transit

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953324153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953324153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84953324153

VL - 43

SP - 49

EP - 58

JO - Transportation Research, Part D: Transport and Environment

JF - Transportation Research, Part D: Transport and Environment

SN - 1361-9209

ER -