Threatened selves and differential prejudice expression by White and Black perceivers

Jenessa R. Shapiro, Stephen A. Mistler, Steven Neuberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous theorizing suggests that often-stigmatized individuals may be just as likely, if not more likely, than infrequently stigmatized individuals to protect self-regard by derogating members of low-status groups after receiving negative feedback from high-status others. Often-stigmatized individuals, however, can discount criticism from these high-status others as reflecting prejudice, thereby making outgroup derogation unnecessary as an esteem-protective strategy. Replicating past research, White participants in Experiment 1 expressed prejudices after receiving negative feedback from a White evaluator; as predicted, however, Black participants did not. In Experiment 2, participants instead received negative feedback from Black evaluators (evaluators more likely to threaten Black participants' self-regard). Here, contrary to previous theorizing, Black participants expressed prejudices, not toward another low-status group, but toward high-status Whites. In all, findings reveal flaws in previous assumptions that frequently stigmatized individuals may be especially prone to devalue lower-status others after rejection or negative feedback from members of higher-status groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)469-473
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

prejudice
status group
experiment
outgroup
criticism
hydroquinone
Research

Keywords

  • Intergroup interaction
  • Prejudice expression
  • Stigma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Threatened selves and differential prejudice expression by White and Black perceivers. / Shapiro, Jenessa R.; Mistler, Stephen A.; Neuberg, Steven.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 2, 03.2010, p. 469-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f9ba0cdb559044478e02f5964782aaac,
title = "Threatened selves and differential prejudice expression by White and Black perceivers",
abstract = "Previous theorizing suggests that often-stigmatized individuals may be just as likely, if not more likely, than infrequently stigmatized individuals to protect self-regard by derogating members of low-status groups after receiving negative feedback from high-status others. Often-stigmatized individuals, however, can discount criticism from these high-status others as reflecting prejudice, thereby making outgroup derogation unnecessary as an esteem-protective strategy. Replicating past research, White participants in Experiment 1 expressed prejudices after receiving negative feedback from a White evaluator; as predicted, however, Black participants did not. In Experiment 2, participants instead received negative feedback from Black evaluators (evaluators more likely to threaten Black participants' self-regard). Here, contrary to previous theorizing, Black participants expressed prejudices, not toward another low-status group, but toward high-status Whites. In all, findings reveal flaws in previous assumptions that frequently stigmatized individuals may be especially prone to devalue lower-status others after rejection or negative feedback from members of higher-status groups.",
keywords = "Intergroup interaction, Prejudice expression, Stigma",
author = "Shapiro, {Jenessa R.} and Mistler, {Stephen A.} and Steven Neuberg",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "469--473",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Threatened selves and differential prejudice expression by White and Black perceivers

AU - Shapiro, Jenessa R.

AU - Mistler, Stephen A.

AU - Neuberg, Steven

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Previous theorizing suggests that often-stigmatized individuals may be just as likely, if not more likely, than infrequently stigmatized individuals to protect self-regard by derogating members of low-status groups after receiving negative feedback from high-status others. Often-stigmatized individuals, however, can discount criticism from these high-status others as reflecting prejudice, thereby making outgroup derogation unnecessary as an esteem-protective strategy. Replicating past research, White participants in Experiment 1 expressed prejudices after receiving negative feedback from a White evaluator; as predicted, however, Black participants did not. In Experiment 2, participants instead received negative feedback from Black evaluators (evaluators more likely to threaten Black participants' self-regard). Here, contrary to previous theorizing, Black participants expressed prejudices, not toward another low-status group, but toward high-status Whites. In all, findings reveal flaws in previous assumptions that frequently stigmatized individuals may be especially prone to devalue lower-status others after rejection or negative feedback from members of higher-status groups.

AB - Previous theorizing suggests that often-stigmatized individuals may be just as likely, if not more likely, than infrequently stigmatized individuals to protect self-regard by derogating members of low-status groups after receiving negative feedback from high-status others. Often-stigmatized individuals, however, can discount criticism from these high-status others as reflecting prejudice, thereby making outgroup derogation unnecessary as an esteem-protective strategy. Replicating past research, White participants in Experiment 1 expressed prejudices after receiving negative feedback from a White evaluator; as predicted, however, Black participants did not. In Experiment 2, participants instead received negative feedback from Black evaluators (evaluators more likely to threaten Black participants' self-regard). Here, contrary to previous theorizing, Black participants expressed prejudices, not toward another low-status group, but toward high-status Whites. In all, findings reveal flaws in previous assumptions that frequently stigmatized individuals may be especially prone to devalue lower-status others after rejection or negative feedback from members of higher-status groups.

KW - Intergroup interaction

KW - Prejudice expression

KW - Stigma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75749084896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75749084896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.013

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:75749084896

VL - 46

SP - 469

EP - 473

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

IS - 2

ER -