Thermodynamic effects on organismal performance: Is hotter better?

Michael Angilletta, Raymond B. Huey, Melanie R. Frazier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

132 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite decades of research on the evolution of thermal physiology at least one fundamental issue remains unresolved: whether the maximal performance of a genotype depends on its optimal temperature. One school argues that warm-adapted genotypes will outperform cold-adapted genotypes because high temperatures inevitably accelerate chemical reactions. Yet another school holds that biochemical adaptation can compensate for thermodynamic effects on performance. Here, we briefly discuss this theoretical debate and then summarize empirical studies that address whether hotter is better. In general, comparative and experimental studies support the view that hotter is better. Furthermore, recent modeling has shown that thermodynamic constraints impose unique selective pressures on thermal sensitivity. Nevertheless, the thermodynamic effect on maximal performance varies greatly among traits and taxa suggesting the need to develop a more sophisticated view of thermodynamic constraints.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-206
Number of pages10
JournalPhysiological and Biochemical Zoology
Volume83
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thermodynamics
thermodynamics
Genotype
genotype
Hot Temperature
heat
Temperature
Physiology
chemical reactions
Chemical reactions
temperature
physiology
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Physiology
  • Biochemistry

Cite this

Thermodynamic effects on organismal performance : Is hotter better? / Angilletta, Michael; Huey, Raymond B.; Frazier, Melanie R.

In: Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, Vol. 83, No. 2, 03.2010, p. 197-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Angilletta, Michael ; Huey, Raymond B. ; Frazier, Melanie R. / Thermodynamic effects on organismal performance : Is hotter better?. In: Physiological and Biochemical Zoology. 2010 ; Vol. 83, No. 2. pp. 197-206.
@article{f4f1f99cdfe54970870937801477b4c4,
title = "Thermodynamic effects on organismal performance: Is hotter better?",
abstract = "Despite decades of research on the evolution of thermal physiology at least one fundamental issue remains unresolved: whether the maximal performance of a genotype depends on its optimal temperature. One school argues that warm-adapted genotypes will outperform cold-adapted genotypes because high temperatures inevitably accelerate chemical reactions. Yet another school holds that biochemical adaptation can compensate for thermodynamic effects on performance. Here, we briefly discuss this theoretical debate and then summarize empirical studies that address whether hotter is better. In general, comparative and experimental studies support the view that hotter is better. Furthermore, recent modeling has shown that thermodynamic constraints impose unique selective pressures on thermal sensitivity. Nevertheless, the thermodynamic effect on maximal performance varies greatly among traits and taxa suggesting the need to develop a more sophisticated view of thermodynamic constraints.",
author = "Michael Angilletta and Huey, {Raymond B.} and Frazier, {Melanie R.}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1086/648567",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "197--206",
journal = "Physiological and Biochemical Zoology",
issn = "1522-2152",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thermodynamic effects on organismal performance

T2 - Is hotter better?

AU - Angilletta, Michael

AU - Huey, Raymond B.

AU - Frazier, Melanie R.

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Despite decades of research on the evolution of thermal physiology at least one fundamental issue remains unresolved: whether the maximal performance of a genotype depends on its optimal temperature. One school argues that warm-adapted genotypes will outperform cold-adapted genotypes because high temperatures inevitably accelerate chemical reactions. Yet another school holds that biochemical adaptation can compensate for thermodynamic effects on performance. Here, we briefly discuss this theoretical debate and then summarize empirical studies that address whether hotter is better. In general, comparative and experimental studies support the view that hotter is better. Furthermore, recent modeling has shown that thermodynamic constraints impose unique selective pressures on thermal sensitivity. Nevertheless, the thermodynamic effect on maximal performance varies greatly among traits and taxa suggesting the need to develop a more sophisticated view of thermodynamic constraints.

AB - Despite decades of research on the evolution of thermal physiology at least one fundamental issue remains unresolved: whether the maximal performance of a genotype depends on its optimal temperature. One school argues that warm-adapted genotypes will outperform cold-adapted genotypes because high temperatures inevitably accelerate chemical reactions. Yet another school holds that biochemical adaptation can compensate for thermodynamic effects on performance. Here, we briefly discuss this theoretical debate and then summarize empirical studies that address whether hotter is better. In general, comparative and experimental studies support the view that hotter is better. Furthermore, recent modeling has shown that thermodynamic constraints impose unique selective pressures on thermal sensitivity. Nevertheless, the thermodynamic effect on maximal performance varies greatly among traits and taxa suggesting the need to develop a more sophisticated view of thermodynamic constraints.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77749291887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77749291887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/648567

DO - 10.1086/648567

M3 - Article

C2 - 20001251

AN - SCOPUS:77749291887

VL - 83

SP - 197

EP - 206

JO - Physiological and Biochemical Zoology

JF - Physiological and Biochemical Zoology

SN - 1522-2152

IS - 2

ER -