Theravāda Buddhist civilizations and their modern formations

Juliane Schober, Steven Collins

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    3Today, more than 150 million people around the world practice Theravāda Buddhism, from Sri Lanka, Southeast Asia and Southwestern China to Vietnam, Indonesia, Nepal, among Dalits in India, and throughout diaspora networks in Europe, North America, and Australia. Buddhist practices such as merit making rituals have always been inseparable from the social formations that give rise to them, their authorizing discourses and the hegemonic relations they create. Traditionally, kings acted as patrons of Buddhist institutions and their power was understood as a reflection of moral practice (karma). Merit gained from sponsoring rituals was seen not only in future rewards, but also constructed the fabric of social and political relationships, particularly in traditional contexts. The social formations classical Buddhist kingdoms produced profoundly influenced this tradition in creating what Foucault described as dispositif, which is occasionally translated as ‘apparatus.’ He described his use of the term in the following way: What I’m trying to pick out with this term is, firstly, a thoroughly heterogeneous ensemble consisting of discourses, institutions, architectural forms, regulatory decisions, laws, administrative measures, scientific statements, philosophical, moral and philanthropic propositions-in short, the said as much as the unsaid. Such are the elements of the apparatus. The apparatus itself is the system of relations that can be established between these elements.1

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationTheravada Buddhist Encounters with Modernity
    PublisherTaylor and Francis
    Pages3-16
    Number of pages14
    ISBN (Electronic)9781317268536
    ISBN (Print)9781138192744
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

    Fingerprint

    civilization
    religious behavior
    dispositif
    sponsoring
    administrative law
    Buddhism
    discourse
    Nepal
    Sri Lanka
    Southeast Asia
    diaspora
    Vietnam
    Indonesia
    reward
    India
    China
    Civilization
    Buddhist
    Merit
    Discourse

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Arts and Humanities(all)
    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Schober, J., & Collins, S. (2017). Theravāda Buddhist civilizations and their modern formations. In Theravada Buddhist Encounters with Modernity (pp. 3-16). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637600

    Theravāda Buddhist civilizations and their modern formations. / Schober, Juliane; Collins, Steven.

    Theravada Buddhist Encounters with Modernity. Taylor and Francis, 2017. p. 3-16.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Schober, J & Collins, S 2017, Theravāda Buddhist civilizations and their modern formations. in Theravada Buddhist Encounters with Modernity. Taylor and Francis, pp. 3-16. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637600
    Schober J, Collins S. Theravāda Buddhist civilizations and their modern formations. In Theravada Buddhist Encounters with Modernity. Taylor and Francis. 2017. p. 3-16 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637600
    Schober, Juliane ; Collins, Steven. / Theravāda Buddhist civilizations and their modern formations. Theravada Buddhist Encounters with Modernity. Taylor and Francis, 2017. pp. 3-16
    @inbook{970ff70d29e2469a866d34c234c0d40d,
    title = "Theravāda Buddhist civilizations and their modern formations",
    abstract = "3Today, more than 150 million people around the world practice Theravāda Buddhism, from Sri Lanka, Southeast Asia and Southwestern China to Vietnam, Indonesia, Nepal, among Dalits in India, and throughout diaspora networks in Europe, North America, and Australia. Buddhist practices such as merit making rituals have always been inseparable from the social formations that give rise to them, their authorizing discourses and the hegemonic relations they create. Traditionally, kings acted as patrons of Buddhist institutions and their power was understood as a reflection of moral practice (karma). Merit gained from sponsoring rituals was seen not only in future rewards, but also constructed the fabric of social and political relationships, particularly in traditional contexts. The social formations classical Buddhist kingdoms produced profoundly influenced this tradition in creating what Foucault described as dispositif, which is occasionally translated as ‘apparatus.’ He described his use of the term in the following way: What I’m trying to pick out with this term is, firstly, a thoroughly heterogeneous ensemble consisting of discourses, institutions, architectural forms, regulatory decisions, laws, administrative measures, scientific statements, philosophical, moral and philanthropic propositions-in short, the said as much as the unsaid. Such are the elements of the apparatus. The apparatus itself is the system of relations that can be established between these elements.1",
    author = "Juliane Schober and Steven Collins",
    year = "2017",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.4324/9781315637600",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9781138192744",
    pages = "3--16",
    booktitle = "Theravada Buddhist Encounters with Modernity",
    publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Theravāda Buddhist civilizations and their modern formations

    AU - Schober, Juliane

    AU - Collins, Steven

    PY - 2017/1/1

    Y1 - 2017/1/1

    N2 - 3Today, more than 150 million people around the world practice Theravāda Buddhism, from Sri Lanka, Southeast Asia and Southwestern China to Vietnam, Indonesia, Nepal, among Dalits in India, and throughout diaspora networks in Europe, North America, and Australia. Buddhist practices such as merit making rituals have always been inseparable from the social formations that give rise to them, their authorizing discourses and the hegemonic relations they create. Traditionally, kings acted as patrons of Buddhist institutions and their power was understood as a reflection of moral practice (karma). Merit gained from sponsoring rituals was seen not only in future rewards, but also constructed the fabric of social and political relationships, particularly in traditional contexts. The social formations classical Buddhist kingdoms produced profoundly influenced this tradition in creating what Foucault described as dispositif, which is occasionally translated as ‘apparatus.’ He described his use of the term in the following way: What I’m trying to pick out with this term is, firstly, a thoroughly heterogeneous ensemble consisting of discourses, institutions, architectural forms, regulatory decisions, laws, administrative measures, scientific statements, philosophical, moral and philanthropic propositions-in short, the said as much as the unsaid. Such are the elements of the apparatus. The apparatus itself is the system of relations that can be established between these elements.1

    AB - 3Today, more than 150 million people around the world practice Theravāda Buddhism, from Sri Lanka, Southeast Asia and Southwestern China to Vietnam, Indonesia, Nepal, among Dalits in India, and throughout diaspora networks in Europe, North America, and Australia. Buddhist practices such as merit making rituals have always been inseparable from the social formations that give rise to them, their authorizing discourses and the hegemonic relations they create. Traditionally, kings acted as patrons of Buddhist institutions and their power was understood as a reflection of moral practice (karma). Merit gained from sponsoring rituals was seen not only in future rewards, but also constructed the fabric of social and political relationships, particularly in traditional contexts. The social formations classical Buddhist kingdoms produced profoundly influenced this tradition in creating what Foucault described as dispositif, which is occasionally translated as ‘apparatus.’ He described his use of the term in the following way: What I’m trying to pick out with this term is, firstly, a thoroughly heterogeneous ensemble consisting of discourses, institutions, architectural forms, regulatory decisions, laws, administrative measures, scientific statements, philosophical, moral and philanthropic propositions-in short, the said as much as the unsaid. Such are the elements of the apparatus. The apparatus itself is the system of relations that can be established between these elements.1

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045076098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045076098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.4324/9781315637600

    DO - 10.4324/9781315637600

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9781138192744

    SP - 3

    EP - 16

    BT - Theravada Buddhist Encounters with Modernity

    PB - Taylor and Francis

    ER -