Theory building in the om/scm field

Pointing to the future by looking at the past

Thomas Choi, John G. Wacker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine select theoretical papers from the Journal of Supply Chain Management (JSCM) and Journal of Operations Management (JOM) over a time period of the last 10 years. Our study reveals good theory-building practices. We find that the authors delineate a clear boundary around the operations management and supply chain management (OM/SCM) issue of their theoretical consideration. They build on existing theoretical perspectives but also advance the existing body of literature by proposing new constructs that can have a broader appeal. Multiple theoretical perspectives are integrated to explain an OM/SCM issue. Some of these perspectives can involve theoretically opposing or orthogonal concepts. By doing so, the authors often challenge the underlying theoretical conception of a dominant paradigm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8-11
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Supply Chain Management
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Supply chain management
Operations management
And supply chain management
Theory building

Keywords

  • Conceptual boundaries
  • Dominant paradigm
  • Multiple theories
  • Orthogonal concepts

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing
  • Information Systems
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
  • Management Information Systems

Cite this

Theory building in the om/scm field : Pointing to the future by looking at the past. / Choi, Thomas; Wacker, John G.

In: Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 47, No. 2, 04.2011, p. 8-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{27a2ed747add4924a3d195a83dba6541,
title = "Theory building in the om/scm field: Pointing to the future by looking at the past",
abstract = "We examine select theoretical papers from the Journal of Supply Chain Management (JSCM) and Journal of Operations Management (JOM) over a time period of the last 10 years. Our study reveals good theory-building practices. We find that the authors delineate a clear boundary around the operations management and supply chain management (OM/SCM) issue of their theoretical consideration. They build on existing theoretical perspectives but also advance the existing body of literature by proposing new constructs that can have a broader appeal. Multiple theoretical perspectives are integrated to explain an OM/SCM issue. Some of these perspectives can involve theoretically opposing or orthogonal concepts. By doing so, the authors often challenge the underlying theoretical conception of a dominant paradigm.",
keywords = "Conceptual boundaries, Dominant paradigm, Multiple theories, Orthogonal concepts",
author = "Thomas Choi and Wacker, {John G.}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03219.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "8--11",
journal = "Journal of Supply Chain Management",
issn = "1523-2409",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theory building in the om/scm field

T2 - Pointing to the future by looking at the past

AU - Choi, Thomas

AU - Wacker, John G.

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - We examine select theoretical papers from the Journal of Supply Chain Management (JSCM) and Journal of Operations Management (JOM) over a time period of the last 10 years. Our study reveals good theory-building practices. We find that the authors delineate a clear boundary around the operations management and supply chain management (OM/SCM) issue of their theoretical consideration. They build on existing theoretical perspectives but also advance the existing body of literature by proposing new constructs that can have a broader appeal. Multiple theoretical perspectives are integrated to explain an OM/SCM issue. Some of these perspectives can involve theoretically opposing or orthogonal concepts. By doing so, the authors often challenge the underlying theoretical conception of a dominant paradigm.

AB - We examine select theoretical papers from the Journal of Supply Chain Management (JSCM) and Journal of Operations Management (JOM) over a time period of the last 10 years. Our study reveals good theory-building practices. We find that the authors delineate a clear boundary around the operations management and supply chain management (OM/SCM) issue of their theoretical consideration. They build on existing theoretical perspectives but also advance the existing body of literature by proposing new constructs that can have a broader appeal. Multiple theoretical perspectives are integrated to explain an OM/SCM issue. Some of these perspectives can involve theoretically opposing or orthogonal concepts. By doing so, the authors often challenge the underlying theoretical conception of a dominant paradigm.

KW - Conceptual boundaries

KW - Dominant paradigm

KW - Multiple theories

KW - Orthogonal concepts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953188717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953188717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03219.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03219.x

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 8

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Supply Chain Management

JF - Journal of Supply Chain Management

SN - 1523-2409

IS - 2

ER -