Theory and analysis of company-sponsored value co-creation

Li Chen, James Marsden, Zhongju Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In today's dynamic business environment, companies are under tremendous pressure to become more innovative and maintain a steady stream of ideas that can lead to new and improved products and services. Companies have begun to explore the possibility of capturing consumers' "collective intelligence" by establishing firm-sponsored online brainstorming sites where individuals can share their ideas and offer comments on the ideas contributed by others. We term these sites "Company-Sponsored Online Co-Creation Brainstorming" (COCB). The value of this open and voluntary co-creation depends largely on members' contribution levels, the quality of the contributions, and sustained participation. In this paper, utilizing Zwass's taxonomy of co-creation value as a base, we structure a taxonomic framework of COCBs and an accompanying basic model of COCBs. We then present a series of hypotheses concerning the relationships between the model's various factors and specific COCB activities. We validate the model using empirical data collected over two and a half years, starting from the initiation of a pioneering company-sponsored online brainstorming site. Our analyses demonstrate that the level of peer feedback and the responsiveness (speed) of sponsor company feedback have significant influences on both members' contribution levels and duration of active participation. The sponsoring company's feedback, however, seems to influence only the quality of member's contribution level. On the practical side, the outcomes suggest that sponsoring companies should develop efficient processes for reviewing and responding to submitted ideas. Regarding theory, our findings provide an initial piece of contextualized research that offers implications for theory building in the COCB context, most notably the identification of key relationships between feedback (both peer and company) and participant activity levels and duration of participation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-172
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Management Information Systems
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Industry
Feedback
Brainstorming
Value co-creation
Taxonomies
Co-creation
Participation
Peers
Sponsoring
Factors
Responsiveness
Empirical data
Reviewing
Sponsor
Theory building
Collective intelligence
Taxonomy
Co-creation of value
Business environment
Pioneering

Keywords

  • Brainstorming
  • Co-creation
  • Contribution quality
  • Sustained participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Theory and analysis of company-sponsored value co-creation. / Chen, Li; Marsden, James; Zhang, Zhongju.

In: Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 29, No. 2, 01.10.2012, p. 141-172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5f81157c11e24e739b8e85fae1219ffa,
title = "Theory and analysis of company-sponsored value co-creation",
abstract = "In today's dynamic business environment, companies are under tremendous pressure to become more innovative and maintain a steady stream of ideas that can lead to new and improved products and services. Companies have begun to explore the possibility of capturing consumers' {"}collective intelligence{"} by establishing firm-sponsored online brainstorming sites where individuals can share their ideas and offer comments on the ideas contributed by others. We term these sites {"}Company-Sponsored Online Co-Creation Brainstorming{"} (COCB). The value of this open and voluntary co-creation depends largely on members' contribution levels, the quality of the contributions, and sustained participation. In this paper, utilizing Zwass's taxonomy of co-creation value as a base, we structure a taxonomic framework of COCBs and an accompanying basic model of COCBs. We then present a series of hypotheses concerning the relationships between the model's various factors and specific COCB activities. We validate the model using empirical data collected over two and a half years, starting from the initiation of a pioneering company-sponsored online brainstorming site. Our analyses demonstrate that the level of peer feedback and the responsiveness (speed) of sponsor company feedback have significant influences on both members' contribution levels and duration of active participation. The sponsoring company's feedback, however, seems to influence only the quality of member's contribution level. On the practical side, the outcomes suggest that sponsoring companies should develop efficient processes for reviewing and responding to submitted ideas. Regarding theory, our findings provide an initial piece of contextualized research that offers implications for theory building in the COCB context, most notably the identification of key relationships between feedback (both peer and company) and participant activity levels and duration of participation.",
keywords = "Brainstorming, Co-creation, Contribution quality, Sustained participation",
author = "Li Chen and James Marsden and Zhongju Zhang",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2753/MIS0742-1222290206",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "141--172",
journal = "Journal of Management Information Systems",
issn = "0742-1222",
publisher = "M.E. Sharpe Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theory and analysis of company-sponsored value co-creation

AU - Chen, Li

AU - Marsden, James

AU - Zhang, Zhongju

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - In today's dynamic business environment, companies are under tremendous pressure to become more innovative and maintain a steady stream of ideas that can lead to new and improved products and services. Companies have begun to explore the possibility of capturing consumers' "collective intelligence" by establishing firm-sponsored online brainstorming sites where individuals can share their ideas and offer comments on the ideas contributed by others. We term these sites "Company-Sponsored Online Co-Creation Brainstorming" (COCB). The value of this open and voluntary co-creation depends largely on members' contribution levels, the quality of the contributions, and sustained participation. In this paper, utilizing Zwass's taxonomy of co-creation value as a base, we structure a taxonomic framework of COCBs and an accompanying basic model of COCBs. We then present a series of hypotheses concerning the relationships between the model's various factors and specific COCB activities. We validate the model using empirical data collected over two and a half years, starting from the initiation of a pioneering company-sponsored online brainstorming site. Our analyses demonstrate that the level of peer feedback and the responsiveness (speed) of sponsor company feedback have significant influences on both members' contribution levels and duration of active participation. The sponsoring company's feedback, however, seems to influence only the quality of member's contribution level. On the practical side, the outcomes suggest that sponsoring companies should develop efficient processes for reviewing and responding to submitted ideas. Regarding theory, our findings provide an initial piece of contextualized research that offers implications for theory building in the COCB context, most notably the identification of key relationships between feedback (both peer and company) and participant activity levels and duration of participation.

AB - In today's dynamic business environment, companies are under tremendous pressure to become more innovative and maintain a steady stream of ideas that can lead to new and improved products and services. Companies have begun to explore the possibility of capturing consumers' "collective intelligence" by establishing firm-sponsored online brainstorming sites where individuals can share their ideas and offer comments on the ideas contributed by others. We term these sites "Company-Sponsored Online Co-Creation Brainstorming" (COCB). The value of this open and voluntary co-creation depends largely on members' contribution levels, the quality of the contributions, and sustained participation. In this paper, utilizing Zwass's taxonomy of co-creation value as a base, we structure a taxonomic framework of COCBs and an accompanying basic model of COCBs. We then present a series of hypotheses concerning the relationships between the model's various factors and specific COCB activities. We validate the model using empirical data collected over two and a half years, starting from the initiation of a pioneering company-sponsored online brainstorming site. Our analyses demonstrate that the level of peer feedback and the responsiveness (speed) of sponsor company feedback have significant influences on both members' contribution levels and duration of active participation. The sponsoring company's feedback, however, seems to influence only the quality of member's contribution level. On the practical side, the outcomes suggest that sponsoring companies should develop efficient processes for reviewing and responding to submitted ideas. Regarding theory, our findings provide an initial piece of contextualized research that offers implications for theory building in the COCB context, most notably the identification of key relationships between feedback (both peer and company) and participant activity levels and duration of participation.

KW - Brainstorming

KW - Co-creation

KW - Contribution quality

KW - Sustained participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870617914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870617914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2753/MIS0742-1222290206

DO - 10.2753/MIS0742-1222290206

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 141

EP - 172

JO - Journal of Management Information Systems

JF - Journal of Management Information Systems

SN - 0742-1222

IS - 2

ER -