Theorizing things

Status, problems and benefits of the critical interpretation of objects

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Things occupy significant portions of physical and symbolic space in our daily lives and yet their appearance in scholarly discourse is either infrequent or scattered across academic departments. Disciplines and areas of study such as industrial design, anthropology, material culture studies, engineering, philosophy, as well as media and cultural studies, do routinely examine, analyse and debate the significance of material objects, but the symbolic meanings and values ascribed to them vary widely within these branches of learning. Design studies, which has traditionally regarded objects in formal rather than social terms, can benefit by expanding its discourse to include a more socially- and culturally- rooted understanding of objects. This knowledge will serve to inform not only design studies but also other disciplines about the role of design in fashioning objects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-15
Number of pages13
JournalDesign Journal
Volume9
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Product design
Discourse
Physical
Cultural Studies
Anthropology
Symbolic Space
Media Studies
Philosophy
Symbolic Meaning
Daily Life
Industrial Design
Material Objects
Material Culture Studies

Keywords

  • Culture of objects
  • Design theory
  • Material culture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Cite this

Theorizing things : Status, problems and benefits of the critical interpretation of objects. / Boradkar, Prasad.

In: Design Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2006, p. 3-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{92e63c07072d4212bce0f9267e0fab8d,
title = "Theorizing things: Status, problems and benefits of the critical interpretation of objects",
abstract = "Things occupy significant portions of physical and symbolic space in our daily lives and yet their appearance in scholarly discourse is either infrequent or scattered across academic departments. Disciplines and areas of study such as industrial design, anthropology, material culture studies, engineering, philosophy, as well as media and cultural studies, do routinely examine, analyse and debate the significance of material objects, but the symbolic meanings and values ascribed to them vary widely within these branches of learning. Design studies, which has traditionally regarded objects in formal rather than social terms, can benefit by expanding its discourse to include a more socially- and culturally- rooted understanding of objects. This knowledge will serve to inform not only design studies but also other disciplines about the role of design in fashioning objects.",
keywords = "Culture of objects, Design theory, Material culture",
author = "Prasad Boradkar",
year = "2006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "3--15",
journal = "The Design Journal",
issn = "1460-6925",
publisher = "Berg Publishers",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theorizing things

T2 - Status, problems and benefits of the critical interpretation of objects

AU - Boradkar, Prasad

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Things occupy significant portions of physical and symbolic space in our daily lives and yet their appearance in scholarly discourse is either infrequent or scattered across academic departments. Disciplines and areas of study such as industrial design, anthropology, material culture studies, engineering, philosophy, as well as media and cultural studies, do routinely examine, analyse and debate the significance of material objects, but the symbolic meanings and values ascribed to them vary widely within these branches of learning. Design studies, which has traditionally regarded objects in formal rather than social terms, can benefit by expanding its discourse to include a more socially- and culturally- rooted understanding of objects. This knowledge will serve to inform not only design studies but also other disciplines about the role of design in fashioning objects.

AB - Things occupy significant portions of physical and symbolic space in our daily lives and yet their appearance in scholarly discourse is either infrequent or scattered across academic departments. Disciplines and areas of study such as industrial design, anthropology, material culture studies, engineering, philosophy, as well as media and cultural studies, do routinely examine, analyse and debate the significance of material objects, but the symbolic meanings and values ascribed to them vary widely within these branches of learning. Design studies, which has traditionally regarded objects in formal rather than social terms, can benefit by expanding its discourse to include a more socially- and culturally- rooted understanding of objects. This knowledge will serve to inform not only design studies but also other disciplines about the role of design in fashioning objects.

KW - Culture of objects

KW - Design theory

KW - Material culture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751055437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751055437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 3

EP - 15

JO - The Design Journal

JF - The Design Journal

SN - 1460-6925

IS - 2

ER -