Theology of nature in sixteenth-century Italian Jewish philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper focuses on several Italian Jewish philosophers in the second half of the sixteenth century and the first third of the seventeenth century. It argues that their writings share a certain theology of nature. Because of it, the interest of Jews in the study of nature was not a proto-scientific but a hermeneutical activity based on the essential correspondence between God, Torah, and Israel. While the theology of nature analyzed in the paper did not prevent Jews from being informed about and selectively endorsing the first phase of the scientific revolution, it did render the Jews marginal to it. So long as Jewish thinkers adhered to this theology of nature, Jews could not adopt the scientific mentality that presupposed a qualitative distinction between the Book of Nature and the Book of Scripture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)529-570
Number of pages42
JournalScience in Context
Volume10
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

sixteenth century
theology
Jew
scientific revolution
mentality
seventeenth century
god
Israel
philosophy
Jewish philosophy
Jews
Theology of Nature
Nature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History

Cite this

Theology of nature in sixteenth-century Italian Jewish philosophy. / Samuelson, Hava.

In: Science in Context, Vol. 10, No. 4, 12.1997, p. 529-570.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6c759dea73604fc58b39c44c9d122ad6,
title = "Theology of nature in sixteenth-century Italian Jewish philosophy",
abstract = "This paper focuses on several Italian Jewish philosophers in the second half of the sixteenth century and the first third of the seventeenth century. It argues that their writings share a certain theology of nature. Because of it, the interest of Jews in the study of nature was not a proto-scientific but a hermeneutical activity based on the essential correspondence between God, Torah, and Israel. While the theology of nature analyzed in the paper did not prevent Jews from being informed about and selectively endorsing the first phase of the scientific revolution, it did render the Jews marginal to it. So long as Jewish thinkers adhered to this theology of nature, Jews could not adopt the scientific mentality that presupposed a qualitative distinction between the Book of Nature and the Book of Scripture.",
author = "Hava Samuelson",
year = "1997",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "529--570",
journal = "Science in Context",
issn = "0269-8897",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theology of nature in sixteenth-century Italian Jewish philosophy

AU - Samuelson, Hava

PY - 1997/12

Y1 - 1997/12

N2 - This paper focuses on several Italian Jewish philosophers in the second half of the sixteenth century and the first third of the seventeenth century. It argues that their writings share a certain theology of nature. Because of it, the interest of Jews in the study of nature was not a proto-scientific but a hermeneutical activity based on the essential correspondence between God, Torah, and Israel. While the theology of nature analyzed in the paper did not prevent Jews from being informed about and selectively endorsing the first phase of the scientific revolution, it did render the Jews marginal to it. So long as Jewish thinkers adhered to this theology of nature, Jews could not adopt the scientific mentality that presupposed a qualitative distinction between the Book of Nature and the Book of Scripture.

AB - This paper focuses on several Italian Jewish philosophers in the second half of the sixteenth century and the first third of the seventeenth century. It argues that their writings share a certain theology of nature. Because of it, the interest of Jews in the study of nature was not a proto-scientific but a hermeneutical activity based on the essential correspondence between God, Torah, and Israel. While the theology of nature analyzed in the paper did not prevent Jews from being informed about and selectively endorsing the first phase of the scientific revolution, it did render the Jews marginal to it. So long as Jewish thinkers adhered to this theology of nature, Jews could not adopt the scientific mentality that presupposed a qualitative distinction between the Book of Nature and the Book of Scripture.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031282888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031282888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 529

EP - 570

JO - Science in Context

JF - Science in Context

SN - 0269-8897

IS - 4

ER -