The when and who of social learning and conformist transmission

Michael Muthukrishna, Thomas Morgan, Joseph Henrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Formal evolutionary models predict when individuals rely on social learning over individual learning and the relative strength of their conformist social learning biases. Here we use both treatment effects and individual variation to test predictions about the impact of (1) the number of traits in an environment, (2) the adaptive or payoff relevance of those traits, (3) the fidelity of transmission, and (4) the size of groups. We find that both social learning and the strength of conformist transmission increase with the number of traits, the adaptive value of those traits, and the fidelity of transmission. The strength of conformist transmission increases with group size, but only when there were 2 traits in the environment. Using individual-level variation and recognizing that treatment effects predictably impact individuals differently, we show that IQ negatively predicts social learning, but has a U-shaped relationship to conformist transmission, suggesting strategic use of conformist-biased social learning among those with the highest IQ. Other plausible predictors, such as status, cultural background, and personality, were not predictive. Broadly, our results reveal that not only is the conformist transmission bias ubiquitous, but that past experiments, both human and non-human, have likely underestimated its prevalence and the prevalence of social learning by restricting designs to only 2 traits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEvolution and Human Behavior
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Nov 22 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

learning
group size
individual variation
Personality
Social Learning
Learning
fitness
prediction
experiment
testing
Fidelity
Treatment Effects
effect

Keywords

  • Conformist transmission
  • Cultural evolution
  • Culture
  • Evolution
  • Social learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The when and who of social learning and conformist transmission. / Muthukrishna, Michael; Morgan, Thomas; Henrich, Joseph.

In: Evolution and Human Behavior, 22.11.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e23d54911fe2495f9b95c47009977638,
title = "The when and who of social learning and conformist transmission",
abstract = "Formal evolutionary models predict when individuals rely on social learning over individual learning and the relative strength of their conformist social learning biases. Here we use both treatment effects and individual variation to test predictions about the impact of (1) the number of traits in an environment, (2) the adaptive or payoff relevance of those traits, (3) the fidelity of transmission, and (4) the size of groups. We find that both social learning and the strength of conformist transmission increase with the number of traits, the adaptive value of those traits, and the fidelity of transmission. The strength of conformist transmission increases with group size, but only when there were 2 traits in the environment. Using individual-level variation and recognizing that treatment effects predictably impact individuals differently, we show that IQ negatively predicts social learning, but has a U-shaped relationship to conformist transmission, suggesting strategic use of conformist-biased social learning among those with the highest IQ. Other plausible predictors, such as status, cultural background, and personality, were not predictive. Broadly, our results reveal that not only is the conformist transmission bias ubiquitous, but that past experiments, both human and non-human, have likely underestimated its prevalence and the prevalence of social learning by restricting designs to only 2 traits.",
keywords = "Conformist transmission, Cultural evolution, Culture, Evolution, Social learning",
author = "Michael Muthukrishna and Thomas Morgan and Joseph Henrich",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.05.004",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Evolution and Human Behavior",
issn = "1090-5138",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The when and who of social learning and conformist transmission

AU - Muthukrishna, Michael

AU - Morgan, Thomas

AU - Henrich, Joseph

PY - 2014/11/22

Y1 - 2014/11/22

N2 - Formal evolutionary models predict when individuals rely on social learning over individual learning and the relative strength of their conformist social learning biases. Here we use both treatment effects and individual variation to test predictions about the impact of (1) the number of traits in an environment, (2) the adaptive or payoff relevance of those traits, (3) the fidelity of transmission, and (4) the size of groups. We find that both social learning and the strength of conformist transmission increase with the number of traits, the adaptive value of those traits, and the fidelity of transmission. The strength of conformist transmission increases with group size, but only when there were 2 traits in the environment. Using individual-level variation and recognizing that treatment effects predictably impact individuals differently, we show that IQ negatively predicts social learning, but has a U-shaped relationship to conformist transmission, suggesting strategic use of conformist-biased social learning among those with the highest IQ. Other plausible predictors, such as status, cultural background, and personality, were not predictive. Broadly, our results reveal that not only is the conformist transmission bias ubiquitous, but that past experiments, both human and non-human, have likely underestimated its prevalence and the prevalence of social learning by restricting designs to only 2 traits.

AB - Formal evolutionary models predict when individuals rely on social learning over individual learning and the relative strength of their conformist social learning biases. Here we use both treatment effects and individual variation to test predictions about the impact of (1) the number of traits in an environment, (2) the adaptive or payoff relevance of those traits, (3) the fidelity of transmission, and (4) the size of groups. We find that both social learning and the strength of conformist transmission increase with the number of traits, the adaptive value of those traits, and the fidelity of transmission. The strength of conformist transmission increases with group size, but only when there were 2 traits in the environment. Using individual-level variation and recognizing that treatment effects predictably impact individuals differently, we show that IQ negatively predicts social learning, but has a U-shaped relationship to conformist transmission, suggesting strategic use of conformist-biased social learning among those with the highest IQ. Other plausible predictors, such as status, cultural background, and personality, were not predictive. Broadly, our results reveal that not only is the conformist transmission bias ubiquitous, but that past experiments, both human and non-human, have likely underestimated its prevalence and the prevalence of social learning by restricting designs to only 2 traits.

KW - Conformist transmission

KW - Cultural evolution

KW - Culture

KW - Evolution

KW - Social learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931857874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931857874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.05.004

DO - 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.05.004

M3 - Article

JO - Evolution and Human Behavior

JF - Evolution and Human Behavior

SN - 1090-5138

ER -