The Validity of the Handwriting Scale From the Test of Written Language

Stephen Graham, Kathy Boyer-Shick, Elizabeth Tippets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated the validity of using the Handwriting Scale from the Test of Written Language (Ham-mill & Larsen, 1983) to measure the general legibility of learning disabled students’ writing. The use of the scale with the learning disabled students was supported: Elements considered central to effective handwriting combined to account for approximately two thirds of the variance in learning disabled students’ scores on the scale, and three elements (letter formation, spacing, and neatness) contributed significantly in the prediction of scores. The study also provided a much-needed description of learning disabled students’ handwriting. As a group, the legibility of the writing of the learning disabled students was generally poor, and they received low scores on all elements except slant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)166-171
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Educational Research
Volume82
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

handwriting
written language
learning
student
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

The Validity of the Handwriting Scale From the Test of Written Language. / Graham, Stephen; Boyer-Shick, Kathy; Tippets, Elizabeth.

In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 82, No. 3, 1989, p. 166-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Graham, Stephen ; Boyer-Shick, Kathy ; Tippets, Elizabeth. / The Validity of the Handwriting Scale From the Test of Written Language. In: Journal of Educational Research. 1989 ; Vol. 82, No. 3. pp. 166-171.
@article{4bc2eab866034d5bb29f782a8c5cf395,
title = "The Validity of the Handwriting Scale From the Test of Written Language",
abstract = "We investigated the validity of using the Handwriting Scale from the Test of Written Language (Ham-mill & Larsen, 1983) to measure the general legibility of learning disabled students’ writing. The use of the scale with the learning disabled students was supported: Elements considered central to effective handwriting combined to account for approximately two thirds of the variance in learning disabled students’ scores on the scale, and three elements (letter formation, spacing, and neatness) contributed significantly in the prediction of scores. The study also provided a much-needed description of learning disabled students’ handwriting. As a group, the legibility of the writing of the learning disabled students was generally poor, and they received low scores on all elements except slant.",
author = "Stephen Graham and Kathy Boyer-Shick and Elizabeth Tippets",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1080/00220671.1989.10885886",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "166--171",
journal = "Journal of Educational Research",
issn = "0022-0671",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Validity of the Handwriting Scale From the Test of Written Language

AU - Graham, Stephen

AU - Boyer-Shick, Kathy

AU - Tippets, Elizabeth

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - We investigated the validity of using the Handwriting Scale from the Test of Written Language (Ham-mill & Larsen, 1983) to measure the general legibility of learning disabled students’ writing. The use of the scale with the learning disabled students was supported: Elements considered central to effective handwriting combined to account for approximately two thirds of the variance in learning disabled students’ scores on the scale, and three elements (letter formation, spacing, and neatness) contributed significantly in the prediction of scores. The study also provided a much-needed description of learning disabled students’ handwriting. As a group, the legibility of the writing of the learning disabled students was generally poor, and they received low scores on all elements except slant.

AB - We investigated the validity of using the Handwriting Scale from the Test of Written Language (Ham-mill & Larsen, 1983) to measure the general legibility of learning disabled students’ writing. The use of the scale with the learning disabled students was supported: Elements considered central to effective handwriting combined to account for approximately two thirds of the variance in learning disabled students’ scores on the scale, and three elements (letter formation, spacing, and neatness) contributed significantly in the prediction of scores. The study also provided a much-needed description of learning disabled students’ handwriting. As a group, the legibility of the writing of the learning disabled students was generally poor, and they received low scores on all elements except slant.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929063948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929063948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00220671.1989.10885886

DO - 10.1080/00220671.1989.10885886

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 166

EP - 171

JO - Journal of Educational Research

JF - Journal of Educational Research

SN - 0022-0671

IS - 3

ER -