The Validity and Reliability of Available Intimate Partner Homicide and Reassault Risk Assessment Tools

A Systematic Review

Laurie M. Graham, Kashika M. Sahay, Cynthia F. Rizo, Jill Messing, Rebecca J. Macy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At least one in seven homicides around the world is perpetrated by intimate partners. The danger of intimate partner homicide (IPH) associated with intimate partner violence (IPV) has led to the development of numerous IPV reassault and IPH risk assessment tools. Using 18 electronic databases and research repositories, we conducted a systematic review of IPH or IPV reassault risk assessment instruments. After review, 43 studies reported in 42 articles met inclusion criteria. We systematically extracted, analyzed, and synthesized data on tools studied, sample details, data collection location, study design, analysis methods, validity, reliability, and feasibility of use. Findings indicate that researchers in eight countries have tested 18 distinct IPH or IPV reassault risk assessment tools. The tools are designed for various professionals including law enforcement, first responders, and social workers. Twenty-six studies focused on assessing the risk of male perpetrators, although eight included female perpetrators. Eighteen studies tested tools with people in mixed-sex relationships, though many studies did not explicitly report the gender of both the perpetrators and victims/survivors. The majority of studies were administered or coded by researchers rather than administered in real-world settings. Reliable and valid instruments that accurately and feasibly assess the risk of IPH and IPV reassault in community settings are necessary for improving public safety and reducing violent deaths. Although researchers have developed several instruments assessing different risk factors, systematic research on the feasibility of using these instruments in practice settings is lacking.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalTrauma, Violence, and Abuse
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Homicide
Reproducibility of Results
risk assessment
homicide
violence
Research Personnel
Law Enforcement
law enforcement
Research
Survivors
social worker
inclusion
Intimate Partner Violence
electronics
Databases
death
Safety
gender
community

Keywords

  • assessment
  • cultural contexts
  • domestic violence
  • homicide
  • predicting domestic violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

The Validity and Reliability of Available Intimate Partner Homicide and Reassault Risk Assessment Tools : A Systematic Review. / Graham, Laurie M.; Sahay, Kashika M.; Rizo, Cynthia F.; Messing, Jill; Macy, Rebecca J.

In: Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e84a83a92075417492c939cec4e92c05,
title = "The Validity and Reliability of Available Intimate Partner Homicide and Reassault Risk Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "At least one in seven homicides around the world is perpetrated by intimate partners. The danger of intimate partner homicide (IPH) associated with intimate partner violence (IPV) has led to the development of numerous IPV reassault and IPH risk assessment tools. Using 18 electronic databases and research repositories, we conducted a systematic review of IPH or IPV reassault risk assessment instruments. After review, 43 studies reported in 42 articles met inclusion criteria. We systematically extracted, analyzed, and synthesized data on tools studied, sample details, data collection location, study design, analysis methods, validity, reliability, and feasibility of use. Findings indicate that researchers in eight countries have tested 18 distinct IPH or IPV reassault risk assessment tools. The tools are designed for various professionals including law enforcement, first responders, and social workers. Twenty-six studies focused on assessing the risk of male perpetrators, although eight included female perpetrators. Eighteen studies tested tools with people in mixed-sex relationships, though many studies did not explicitly report the gender of both the perpetrators and victims/survivors. The majority of studies were administered or coded by researchers rather than administered in real-world settings. Reliable and valid instruments that accurately and feasibly assess the risk of IPH and IPV reassault in community settings are necessary for improving public safety and reducing violent deaths. Although researchers have developed several instruments assessing different risk factors, systematic research on the feasibility of using these instruments in practice settings is lacking.",
keywords = "assessment, cultural contexts, domestic violence, homicide, predicting domestic violence",
author = "Graham, {Laurie M.} and Sahay, {Kashika M.} and Rizo, {Cynthia F.} and Jill Messing and Macy, {Rebecca J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1524838018821952",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Trauma, Violence, and Abuse",
issn = "1524-8380",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Validity and Reliability of Available Intimate Partner Homicide and Reassault Risk Assessment Tools

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Graham, Laurie M.

AU - Sahay, Kashika M.

AU - Rizo, Cynthia F.

AU - Messing, Jill

AU - Macy, Rebecca J.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - At least one in seven homicides around the world is perpetrated by intimate partners. The danger of intimate partner homicide (IPH) associated with intimate partner violence (IPV) has led to the development of numerous IPV reassault and IPH risk assessment tools. Using 18 electronic databases and research repositories, we conducted a systematic review of IPH or IPV reassault risk assessment instruments. After review, 43 studies reported in 42 articles met inclusion criteria. We systematically extracted, analyzed, and synthesized data on tools studied, sample details, data collection location, study design, analysis methods, validity, reliability, and feasibility of use. Findings indicate that researchers in eight countries have tested 18 distinct IPH or IPV reassault risk assessment tools. The tools are designed for various professionals including law enforcement, first responders, and social workers. Twenty-six studies focused on assessing the risk of male perpetrators, although eight included female perpetrators. Eighteen studies tested tools with people in mixed-sex relationships, though many studies did not explicitly report the gender of both the perpetrators and victims/survivors. The majority of studies were administered or coded by researchers rather than administered in real-world settings. Reliable and valid instruments that accurately and feasibly assess the risk of IPH and IPV reassault in community settings are necessary for improving public safety and reducing violent deaths. Although researchers have developed several instruments assessing different risk factors, systematic research on the feasibility of using these instruments in practice settings is lacking.

AB - At least one in seven homicides around the world is perpetrated by intimate partners. The danger of intimate partner homicide (IPH) associated with intimate partner violence (IPV) has led to the development of numerous IPV reassault and IPH risk assessment tools. Using 18 electronic databases and research repositories, we conducted a systematic review of IPH or IPV reassault risk assessment instruments. After review, 43 studies reported in 42 articles met inclusion criteria. We systematically extracted, analyzed, and synthesized data on tools studied, sample details, data collection location, study design, analysis methods, validity, reliability, and feasibility of use. Findings indicate that researchers in eight countries have tested 18 distinct IPH or IPV reassault risk assessment tools. The tools are designed for various professionals including law enforcement, first responders, and social workers. Twenty-six studies focused on assessing the risk of male perpetrators, although eight included female perpetrators. Eighteen studies tested tools with people in mixed-sex relationships, though many studies did not explicitly report the gender of both the perpetrators and victims/survivors. The majority of studies were administered or coded by researchers rather than administered in real-world settings. Reliable and valid instruments that accurately and feasibly assess the risk of IPH and IPV reassault in community settings are necessary for improving public safety and reducing violent deaths. Although researchers have developed several instruments assessing different risk factors, systematic research on the feasibility of using these instruments in practice settings is lacking.

KW - assessment

KW - cultural contexts

KW - domestic violence

KW - homicide

KW - predicting domestic violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060614814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060614814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1524838018821952

DO - 10.1177/1524838018821952

M3 - Article

JO - Trauma, Violence, and Abuse

JF - Trauma, Violence, and Abuse

SN - 1524-8380

ER -