Curriculum-based measurement (CBM) and performance assessments (PA) can provide valuable data for making special education eligibility decisions. Both of these alternative assessment methods feature connections among curriculum, instruction, and assessment and offer educators more instructionally sensitive information than traditional intelligence (IQ) tests and achievement measures. In this article, we review applied research on both these assessment approaches and discuss the practical context of treatment validation and decisions about instructional services for students with diverse academic needs. We conclude that CBM is the better developed method and that results from PA should be conceptualized as supplemental to CBM. By combining the use of CBM and PA, practitioners can broaden their assessment focus to include skills acquisition as well as skills application and integration within authentic contexts. Moreover, they can avoid the negative valence frequently associated with IQ tests.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||10|
|Journal||School Psychology Review|
|State||Published - Dec 1 1997|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Developmental and Educational Psychology