Abstract
Labour turnover is one of the major complications that industry faces on a daily basis. Turnover is particularly harmful to serial assembly lines. The learning process that a new operator must undergo when first introduced to an assembly line station generates blockage and starvation in the previous and successive stations, causing a reduction in the line's throughput. In this paper, we analyse different work allocation strategies for serial assembly line designs in order to determine which designs perform best under the presence of labour turnover and a task-learning process. In particular, we compare the traditional balanced line with two other assembly line designs, a variant of the bucket brigades (BB) and a hybrid method - the modified work sharing (MWS) method. By making a judicious use of control buffers, the MWS method seeks to combine the positive characteristics of both the BB and traditional balanced lines to naturally adapt to different levels of labour turnover. The results presented in this paper show that the MWS outperforms the BB and the balanced designs.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 34-53 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2011 |
Keywords
- DWA
- Dynamic work allocation
- Labour turnover
- Serial assembly lines
- Work sharing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Computer Science Applications
- Strategy and Management
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Information Systems and Management
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering