The Ubiquity and Potency of Labeling in Organizations

Blake Ashforth, Ronald H. Humphrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

97 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing on categorization theory, semiotics, and labeling theory, we argue that categories and labels are widely utilized by individuals in organizational settings to help structure and simplify the social environment, primarily for reasons of understanding, consensus, and control. Based largely on such situational criteria as role and rank, people are sorted into various categories and are perceived and treated as exemplars or prototypes of the category. The labels attached to these categories coalesce when individuals triangulate their perceptions of category members with the perceptions that credible peers and powerholders have of category members. Labels distill a complex and perhaps contradictory array of data into concise and coherent packages, and thus provide a potent means of interpreting, representing, and conveying organizational experience and cuing action. However, labels are inherently arbitrary, labels cause individual category members to lose their individuality and assume the affective tone of the category, and labels tend to become reified as objective and normative accounts of social reality. The ubiquity and potency of labeling processes are illustrated with applications to individual-level (service encounters), group-level (intergroup conflict), and organization-level (identity, image, and reputation) phenomena. We speculate that both the process of labeling and the content of labels are similar across levels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43-58
Number of pages16
JournalOrganization Science
Volume8
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Labeling
Labels
Semiotics
Conveying

Keywords

  • Identity
  • Intergroup conflict
  • Labeling
  • Service encounters

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

The Ubiquity and Potency of Labeling in Organizations. / Ashforth, Blake; Humphrey, Ronald H.

In: Organization Science, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.1997, p. 43-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ashforth, Blake ; Humphrey, Ronald H. / The Ubiquity and Potency of Labeling in Organizations. In: Organization Science. 1997 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 43-58.
@article{07ba76ccfa0e438d9b53f36963ad90a8,
title = "The Ubiquity and Potency of Labeling in Organizations",
abstract = "Drawing on categorization theory, semiotics, and labeling theory, we argue that categories and labels are widely utilized by individuals in organizational settings to help structure and simplify the social environment, primarily for reasons of understanding, consensus, and control. Based largely on such situational criteria as role and rank, people are sorted into various categories and are perceived and treated as exemplars or prototypes of the category. The labels attached to these categories coalesce when individuals triangulate their perceptions of category members with the perceptions that credible peers and powerholders have of category members. Labels distill a complex and perhaps contradictory array of data into concise and coherent packages, and thus provide a potent means of interpreting, representing, and conveying organizational experience and cuing action. However, labels are inherently arbitrary, labels cause individual category members to lose their individuality and assume the affective tone of the category, and labels tend to become reified as objective and normative accounts of social reality. The ubiquity and potency of labeling processes are illustrated with applications to individual-level (service encounters), group-level (intergroup conflict), and organization-level (identity, image, and reputation) phenomena. We speculate that both the process of labeling and the content of labels are similar across levels.",
keywords = "Identity, Intergroup conflict, Labeling, Service encounters",
author = "Blake Ashforth and Humphrey, {Ronald H.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "43--58",
journal = "Organization Science",
issn = "1047-7039",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Ubiquity and Potency of Labeling in Organizations

AU - Ashforth, Blake

AU - Humphrey, Ronald H.

PY - 1997/1

Y1 - 1997/1

N2 - Drawing on categorization theory, semiotics, and labeling theory, we argue that categories and labels are widely utilized by individuals in organizational settings to help structure and simplify the social environment, primarily for reasons of understanding, consensus, and control. Based largely on such situational criteria as role and rank, people are sorted into various categories and are perceived and treated as exemplars or prototypes of the category. The labels attached to these categories coalesce when individuals triangulate their perceptions of category members with the perceptions that credible peers and powerholders have of category members. Labels distill a complex and perhaps contradictory array of data into concise and coherent packages, and thus provide a potent means of interpreting, representing, and conveying organizational experience and cuing action. However, labels are inherently arbitrary, labels cause individual category members to lose their individuality and assume the affective tone of the category, and labels tend to become reified as objective and normative accounts of social reality. The ubiquity and potency of labeling processes are illustrated with applications to individual-level (service encounters), group-level (intergroup conflict), and organization-level (identity, image, and reputation) phenomena. We speculate that both the process of labeling and the content of labels are similar across levels.

AB - Drawing on categorization theory, semiotics, and labeling theory, we argue that categories and labels are widely utilized by individuals in organizational settings to help structure and simplify the social environment, primarily for reasons of understanding, consensus, and control. Based largely on such situational criteria as role and rank, people are sorted into various categories and are perceived and treated as exemplars or prototypes of the category. The labels attached to these categories coalesce when individuals triangulate their perceptions of category members with the perceptions that credible peers and powerholders have of category members. Labels distill a complex and perhaps contradictory array of data into concise and coherent packages, and thus provide a potent means of interpreting, representing, and conveying organizational experience and cuing action. However, labels are inherently arbitrary, labels cause individual category members to lose their individuality and assume the affective tone of the category, and labels tend to become reified as objective and normative accounts of social reality. The ubiquity and potency of labeling processes are illustrated with applications to individual-level (service encounters), group-level (intergroup conflict), and organization-level (identity, image, and reputation) phenomena. We speculate that both the process of labeling and the content of labels are similar across levels.

KW - Identity

KW - Intergroup conflict

KW - Labeling

KW - Service encounters

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031512195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031512195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031512195

VL - 8

SP - 43

EP - 58

JO - Organization Science

JF - Organization Science

SN - 1047-7039

IS - 1

ER -