The turbulent world of resilience: interpretations and themes for transdisciplinary dialogue

Susanne Moser, Sara Meerow, James Arnott, Emily Jack-Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Resilience has experienced exponential growth in scholarship and practice over the past several decades. We conduct a meta-analysis of recent review papers on resilience from all relevant fields to distill key themes emanating from both research and practice. These themes reflect prevalent debates, trends and insights from the thousands of underlying papers. The seven themes are: 1) the distinction between resilience as a system trait, process, or outcome; 2) the importance of resilience as a strategy for dealing with uncertainty; 3) a shift from understanding resilience to active resilience building; 4) the incorporation of transformation into resilience; 5) the increasingly normative interpretation of resilience; 6) the growing emphasis on measuring and evaluating resilience; and 7) the mounting critiques of the resilience agenda demanding attention. We discuss each in detail and find that they help explain both why resilience has attracted widespread attention, but also why it is an increasingly contested concept. We offer several steps to engage in productive dialogue across differences in resilience interpretations and conclude that this interand transdisciplinary dialogue is the difficult and necessary work that must be done, if resilience scholarship and practice is to advance in productive ways in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-40
Number of pages20
JournalClimatic Change
Volume153
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

meta-analysis
incorporation
measuring
trend

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

The turbulent world of resilience : interpretations and themes for transdisciplinary dialogue. / Moser, Susanne; Meerow, Sara; Arnott, James; Jack-Scott, Emily.

In: Climatic Change, Vol. 153, No. 1-2, 01.03.2019, p. 21-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moser, Susanne ; Meerow, Sara ; Arnott, James ; Jack-Scott, Emily. / The turbulent world of resilience : interpretations and themes for transdisciplinary dialogue. In: Climatic Change. 2019 ; Vol. 153, No. 1-2. pp. 21-40.
@article{984930eb2bfa47119da97d4b8d62d128,
title = "The turbulent world of resilience: interpretations and themes for transdisciplinary dialogue",
abstract = "Resilience has experienced exponential growth in scholarship and practice over the past several decades. We conduct a meta-analysis of recent review papers on resilience from all relevant fields to distill key themes emanating from both research and practice. These themes reflect prevalent debates, trends and insights from the thousands of underlying papers. The seven themes are: 1) the distinction between resilience as a system trait, process, or outcome; 2) the importance of resilience as a strategy for dealing with uncertainty; 3) a shift from understanding resilience to active resilience building; 4) the incorporation of transformation into resilience; 5) the increasingly normative interpretation of resilience; 6) the growing emphasis on measuring and evaluating resilience; and 7) the mounting critiques of the resilience agenda demanding attention. We discuss each in detail and find that they help explain both why resilience has attracted widespread attention, but also why it is an increasingly contested concept. We offer several steps to engage in productive dialogue across differences in resilience interpretations and conclude that this interand transdisciplinary dialogue is the difficult and necessary work that must be done, if resilience scholarship and practice is to advance in productive ways in the future.",
author = "Susanne Moser and Sara Meerow and James Arnott and Emily Jack-Scott",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "153",
pages = "21--40",
journal = "Climatic Change",
issn = "0165-0009",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The turbulent world of resilience

T2 - interpretations and themes for transdisciplinary dialogue

AU - Moser, Susanne

AU - Meerow, Sara

AU - Arnott, James

AU - Jack-Scott, Emily

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Resilience has experienced exponential growth in scholarship and practice over the past several decades. We conduct a meta-analysis of recent review papers on resilience from all relevant fields to distill key themes emanating from both research and practice. These themes reflect prevalent debates, trends and insights from the thousands of underlying papers. The seven themes are: 1) the distinction between resilience as a system trait, process, or outcome; 2) the importance of resilience as a strategy for dealing with uncertainty; 3) a shift from understanding resilience to active resilience building; 4) the incorporation of transformation into resilience; 5) the increasingly normative interpretation of resilience; 6) the growing emphasis on measuring and evaluating resilience; and 7) the mounting critiques of the resilience agenda demanding attention. We discuss each in detail and find that they help explain both why resilience has attracted widespread attention, but also why it is an increasingly contested concept. We offer several steps to engage in productive dialogue across differences in resilience interpretations and conclude that this interand transdisciplinary dialogue is the difficult and necessary work that must be done, if resilience scholarship and practice is to advance in productive ways in the future.

AB - Resilience has experienced exponential growth in scholarship and practice over the past several decades. We conduct a meta-analysis of recent review papers on resilience from all relevant fields to distill key themes emanating from both research and practice. These themes reflect prevalent debates, trends and insights from the thousands of underlying papers. The seven themes are: 1) the distinction between resilience as a system trait, process, or outcome; 2) the importance of resilience as a strategy for dealing with uncertainty; 3) a shift from understanding resilience to active resilience building; 4) the incorporation of transformation into resilience; 5) the increasingly normative interpretation of resilience; 6) the growing emphasis on measuring and evaluating resilience; and 7) the mounting critiques of the resilience agenda demanding attention. We discuss each in detail and find that they help explain both why resilience has attracted widespread attention, but also why it is an increasingly contested concept. We offer several steps to engage in productive dialogue across differences in resilience interpretations and conclude that this interand transdisciplinary dialogue is the difficult and necessary work that must be done, if resilience scholarship and practice is to advance in productive ways in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059698627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059698627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0

DO - 10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059698627

VL - 153

SP - 21

EP - 40

JO - Climatic Change

JF - Climatic Change

SN - 0165-0009

IS - 1-2

ER -