The “Tough on Crime” Competition

a Network Approach to Understanding the Social Mechanisms Leading to Federal Crime Control Legislation in the United States from 1973–2014

John A. Shjarback, Jacob Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The increase in punitive sentiment in America over the last four decades is frequently attributed to changes in criminal justice policies and programs. While scholars have studied the impact of legislation and policy on justice system outcomes, less attention has focused on the role of political actors in legislative bodies who are largely responsible for enacting criminal justice legislation. The current study addresses this gap by examining the social organization of federal crime control policy in the U.S. Congress over a forty-two year period (1973–2014). Drawing from research on social network mechanisms, we examine whether crime control legislation was more politically attractive relative to other legislative topics, and whether Democrats and Republicans pursue these policies by working together or competing against each other. Our results provide novel insight into the mechanisms that contributed to the punitive movement at the federal level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalAmerican Journal of Criminal Justice
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 19 2017

Fingerprint

legislation
offense
justice
criminal justice policy
political actor
social network
organization

Keywords

  • Congress
  • Crime control
  • Exponential random graph model
  • Homophily
  • Mechanism
  • Social network analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

@article{43c03a1466c942ab95292d87c3afd01f,
title = "The “Tough on Crime” Competition: a Network Approach to Understanding the Social Mechanisms Leading to Federal Crime Control Legislation in the United States from 1973–2014",
abstract = "The increase in punitive sentiment in America over the last four decades is frequently attributed to changes in criminal justice policies and programs. While scholars have studied the impact of legislation and policy on justice system outcomes, less attention has focused on the role of political actors in legislative bodies who are largely responsible for enacting criminal justice legislation. The current study addresses this gap by examining the social organization of federal crime control policy in the U.S. Congress over a forty-two year period (1973–2014). Drawing from research on social network mechanisms, we examine whether crime control legislation was more politically attractive relative to other legislative topics, and whether Democrats and Republicans pursue these policies by working together or competing against each other. Our results provide novel insight into the mechanisms that contributed to the punitive movement at the federal level.",
keywords = "Congress, Crime control, Exponential random graph model, Homophily, Mechanism, Social network analysis",
author = "Shjarback, {John A.} and Jacob Young",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1007/s12103-017-9395-5",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--25",
journal = "American Journal of Criminal Justice",
issn = "1066-2316",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The “Tough on Crime” Competition

T2 - a Network Approach to Understanding the Social Mechanisms Leading to Federal Crime Control Legislation in the United States from 1973–2014

AU - Shjarback, John A.

AU - Young, Jacob

PY - 2017/5/19

Y1 - 2017/5/19

N2 - The increase in punitive sentiment in America over the last four decades is frequently attributed to changes in criminal justice policies and programs. While scholars have studied the impact of legislation and policy on justice system outcomes, less attention has focused on the role of political actors in legislative bodies who are largely responsible for enacting criminal justice legislation. The current study addresses this gap by examining the social organization of federal crime control policy in the U.S. Congress over a forty-two year period (1973–2014). Drawing from research on social network mechanisms, we examine whether crime control legislation was more politically attractive relative to other legislative topics, and whether Democrats and Republicans pursue these policies by working together or competing against each other. Our results provide novel insight into the mechanisms that contributed to the punitive movement at the federal level.

AB - The increase in punitive sentiment in America over the last four decades is frequently attributed to changes in criminal justice policies and programs. While scholars have studied the impact of legislation and policy on justice system outcomes, less attention has focused on the role of political actors in legislative bodies who are largely responsible for enacting criminal justice legislation. The current study addresses this gap by examining the social organization of federal crime control policy in the U.S. Congress over a forty-two year period (1973–2014). Drawing from research on social network mechanisms, we examine whether crime control legislation was more politically attractive relative to other legislative topics, and whether Democrats and Republicans pursue these policies by working together or competing against each other. Our results provide novel insight into the mechanisms that contributed to the punitive movement at the federal level.

KW - Congress

KW - Crime control

KW - Exponential random graph model

KW - Homophily

KW - Mechanism

KW - Social network analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019611071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019611071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12103-017-9395-5

DO - 10.1007/s12103-017-9395-5

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 25

JO - American Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - American Journal of Criminal Justice

SN - 1066-2316

ER -