The Three Schools of CCO Thinking: Interactive Dialogue and Systematic Comparison

Dennis Schoeneborn, Steffen Blaschke, François Cooren, Robert D. McPhee, David Seidl, James R. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Scopus citations

Abstract

The idea of the communicative constitution of organizations (CCO) has gained considerable attention in organizational communication studies. This rather heterogeneous theoretical endeavor is driven by three main schools of thought: the Montreal School of Organizational Communication, the Four-Flows Model (based on Giddens's Structuration Theory), and Luhmann's Theory of Social Systems. In this article, we let proponents of all three schools directly speak to each other in form of an interactive dialogue that is structured around guiding questions addressing the epistemological, ontological, and methodological dimension of CCO as a theoretical paradigm. Based on this dialogue, we systematically compare the three schools of CCO thinking and identify common grounds as well as key differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)285-316
Number of pages32
JournalManagement Communication Quarterly
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2014

Keywords

  • communication as constitutive of organizations
  • organization theory
  • organizational communication
  • paradigms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Three Schools of CCO Thinking: Interactive Dialogue and Systematic Comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Schoeneborn, D., Blaschke, S., Cooren, F., McPhee, R. D., Seidl, D., & Taylor, J. R. (2014). The Three Schools of CCO Thinking: Interactive Dialogue and Systematic Comparison. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 285-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914527000