The theory of child support

Ira Mark Ellman, Tara O Toole Ellman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    More Americans are subject to child support orders, either as obligor or obligee, than to any other civil judgment. Federal law requires each state to have its own guidelines to determine the dollar amounts of most support orders. What principles should decide the design of such guidelines and thus the amount of support to be ordered? What do these fundamental principles say about the impact that a parent's marriage or remarriage should have on the support order? This Article explains why the method most states use to develop child support guidelines prevents productive attention to questions like these. The Article then identifies the four fundamental policy considerations rulemakers are likely to believe relevant, and offers a new method for creating or revising support guidelines that would ensure the guidelines in fact reflect the rulemaker's preferred balance among these four considerations. The recommended method would replace the conventional approach employed by most of the consultants that states rely upon to prepare their guidelines, because the conventional method's exclusive focus on marginal child expenditures prevents such a balanced analysis.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)107-163
    Number of pages57
    JournalHarvard Journal on Legislation
    Volume45
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Dec 2008

    Fingerprint

    remarriage
    federal law
    dollar
    parents
    expenditures
    marriage

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Law

    Cite this

    Ellman, I. M., & Ellman, T. O. T. (2008). The theory of child support. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 45(1), 107-163.

    The theory of child support. / Ellman, Ira Mark; Ellman, Tara O Toole.

    In: Harvard Journal on Legislation, Vol. 45, No. 1, 12.2008, p. 107-163.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Ellman, IM & Ellman, TOT 2008, 'The theory of child support', Harvard Journal on Legislation, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 107-163.
    Ellman IM, Ellman TOT. The theory of child support. Harvard Journal on Legislation. 2008 Dec;45(1):107-163.
    Ellman, Ira Mark ; Ellman, Tara O Toole. / The theory of child support. In: Harvard Journal on Legislation. 2008 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 107-163.
    @article{82288e4323ed4774b9c601d2e9f2a406,
    title = "The theory of child support",
    abstract = "More Americans are subject to child support orders, either as obligor or obligee, than to any other civil judgment. Federal law requires each state to have its own guidelines to determine the dollar amounts of most support orders. What principles should decide the design of such guidelines and thus the amount of support to be ordered? What do these fundamental principles say about the impact that a parent's marriage or remarriage should have on the support order? This Article explains why the method most states use to develop child support guidelines prevents productive attention to questions like these. The Article then identifies the four fundamental policy considerations rulemakers are likely to believe relevant, and offers a new method for creating or revising support guidelines that would ensure the guidelines in fact reflect the rulemaker's preferred balance among these four considerations. The recommended method would replace the conventional approach employed by most of the consultants that states rely upon to prepare their guidelines, because the conventional method's exclusive focus on marginal child expenditures prevents such a balanced analysis.",
    author = "Ellman, {Ira Mark} and Ellman, {Tara O Toole}",
    year = "2008",
    month = "12",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "45",
    pages = "107--163",
    journal = "Harvard Journal of Legislation",
    issn = "0017-808X",
    publisher = "Harvard University",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The theory of child support

    AU - Ellman, Ira Mark

    AU - Ellman, Tara O Toole

    PY - 2008/12

    Y1 - 2008/12

    N2 - More Americans are subject to child support orders, either as obligor or obligee, than to any other civil judgment. Federal law requires each state to have its own guidelines to determine the dollar amounts of most support orders. What principles should decide the design of such guidelines and thus the amount of support to be ordered? What do these fundamental principles say about the impact that a parent's marriage or remarriage should have on the support order? This Article explains why the method most states use to develop child support guidelines prevents productive attention to questions like these. The Article then identifies the four fundamental policy considerations rulemakers are likely to believe relevant, and offers a new method for creating or revising support guidelines that would ensure the guidelines in fact reflect the rulemaker's preferred balance among these four considerations. The recommended method would replace the conventional approach employed by most of the consultants that states rely upon to prepare their guidelines, because the conventional method's exclusive focus on marginal child expenditures prevents such a balanced analysis.

    AB - More Americans are subject to child support orders, either as obligor or obligee, than to any other civil judgment. Federal law requires each state to have its own guidelines to determine the dollar amounts of most support orders. What principles should decide the design of such guidelines and thus the amount of support to be ordered? What do these fundamental principles say about the impact that a parent's marriage or remarriage should have on the support order? This Article explains why the method most states use to develop child support guidelines prevents productive attention to questions like these. The Article then identifies the four fundamental policy considerations rulemakers are likely to believe relevant, and offers a new method for creating or revising support guidelines that would ensure the guidelines in fact reflect the rulemaker's preferred balance among these four considerations. The recommended method would replace the conventional approach employed by most of the consultants that states rely upon to prepare their guidelines, because the conventional method's exclusive focus on marginal child expenditures prevents such a balanced analysis.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41849101449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41849101449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 45

    SP - 107

    EP - 163

    JO - Harvard Journal of Legislation

    JF - Harvard Journal of Legislation

    SN - 0017-808X

    IS - 1

    ER -