The theory and practice of supermax prisons

Daniel P. Mears, Michael D. Reisig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the last two decades, super-maximum custody (or 'supermax) prisons have become increasingly common throughout the American correctional landscape. Although these institutions can be justified using a variety of arguments (e.g. retribution), one of the most commonly used rationalizations is that they promote higher levels of prison order throughout the systems in which they are used. Because of the lack of direct empirical evidence to support this claim, we refer to this argument as the 'system-wide order' conjecture. In this essay, we explore the different pathways through which supermax prisons may achieve system-wide order. Our analysis suggests that the conceptual foundation upon which the system-wide order conjecture rests is unstable, and that empirical research is needed to resolve debates about the merits of supermax prisons in contributing to order in prison systems. We conclude by identifying critical research gaps that must be addressed to better understand the effects of this high-cost correctional approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-57
Number of pages25
JournalPunishment and Society
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

correctional institution
rationalization
child custody
empirical research
lack
costs
evidence

Keywords

  • Correctional policy
  • Prison order
  • Prisons
  • Punishment
  • Supermax

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

The theory and practice of supermax prisons. / Mears, Daniel P.; Reisig, Michael D.

In: Punishment and Society, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.2006, p. 33-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mears, Daniel P. ; Reisig, Michael D. / The theory and practice of supermax prisons. In: Punishment and Society. 2006 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 33-57.
@article{ffbf202e3e2048d394a289086b50b840,
title = "The theory and practice of supermax prisons",
abstract = "Over the last two decades, super-maximum custody (or 'supermax) prisons have become increasingly common throughout the American correctional landscape. Although these institutions can be justified using a variety of arguments (e.g. retribution), one of the most commonly used rationalizations is that they promote higher levels of prison order throughout the systems in which they are used. Because of the lack of direct empirical evidence to support this claim, we refer to this argument as the 'system-wide order' conjecture. In this essay, we explore the different pathways through which supermax prisons may achieve system-wide order. Our analysis suggests that the conceptual foundation upon which the system-wide order conjecture rests is unstable, and that empirical research is needed to resolve debates about the merits of supermax prisons in contributing to order in prison systems. We conclude by identifying critical research gaps that must be addressed to better understand the effects of this high-cost correctional approach.",
keywords = "Correctional policy, Prison order, Prisons, Punishment, Supermax",
author = "Mears, {Daniel P.} and Reisig, {Michael D.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1462474506059139",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "33--57",
journal = "Punishment and Society",
issn = "1462-4745",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The theory and practice of supermax prisons

AU - Mears, Daniel P.

AU - Reisig, Michael D.

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Over the last two decades, super-maximum custody (or 'supermax) prisons have become increasingly common throughout the American correctional landscape. Although these institutions can be justified using a variety of arguments (e.g. retribution), one of the most commonly used rationalizations is that they promote higher levels of prison order throughout the systems in which they are used. Because of the lack of direct empirical evidence to support this claim, we refer to this argument as the 'system-wide order' conjecture. In this essay, we explore the different pathways through which supermax prisons may achieve system-wide order. Our analysis suggests that the conceptual foundation upon which the system-wide order conjecture rests is unstable, and that empirical research is needed to resolve debates about the merits of supermax prisons in contributing to order in prison systems. We conclude by identifying critical research gaps that must be addressed to better understand the effects of this high-cost correctional approach.

AB - Over the last two decades, super-maximum custody (or 'supermax) prisons have become increasingly common throughout the American correctional landscape. Although these institutions can be justified using a variety of arguments (e.g. retribution), one of the most commonly used rationalizations is that they promote higher levels of prison order throughout the systems in which they are used. Because of the lack of direct empirical evidence to support this claim, we refer to this argument as the 'system-wide order' conjecture. In this essay, we explore the different pathways through which supermax prisons may achieve system-wide order. Our analysis suggests that the conceptual foundation upon which the system-wide order conjecture rests is unstable, and that empirical research is needed to resolve debates about the merits of supermax prisons in contributing to order in prison systems. We conclude by identifying critical research gaps that must be addressed to better understand the effects of this high-cost correctional approach.

KW - Correctional policy

KW - Prison order

KW - Prisons

KW - Punishment

KW - Supermax

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30644480696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30644480696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1462474506059139

DO - 10.1177/1462474506059139

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:30644480696

VL - 8

SP - 33

EP - 57

JO - Punishment and Society

JF - Punishment and Society

SN - 1462-4745

IS - 1

ER -