The temporal structure of naming events differentially affects children's and adults’ cross-situational word learning

Viridiana L. Benitez, Martin Zettersten, Erica Wojcik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

To acquire novel words, learners often need to integrate information about word meanings across ambiguous learning events distributed in time. How does the temporal structure of those word learning events affect what learners encode? How do the effects of temporal structure differ in children and adults? In the current experiments, we asked how 4- to 7-year-old children's (N = 110) and adults’ (N = 90) performance on a cross-situational word learning task is influenced by the temporal distribution of learning events. We tested participants in three training conditions, manipulating the number of trials that separated naming events for specific objects. In the Unstructured condition, the temporal distribution was varied; in the Massed condition, naming events occurred with few interleaved trials; and in the Interleaved condition, naming events occurred with many interleaved trials. Adults showed substantially larger benefits from the Massed condition than children, whereas children were equally successful at learning in the Massed and Interleaved conditions. These results provide evidence that adults differ from children in how they exploit temporal structure during cross-situational word learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number104961
JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology
Volume200
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Adults
  • Children
  • Cross-situational learning
  • Language development
  • Statistical learning
  • Word learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The temporal structure of naming events differentially affects children's and adults’ cross-situational word learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this