The subjective experience of acute pain. An assessment of the utility of 10 indices

M. P. Jensen, Paul Karoly, E. F. O'Riordan, F. Bland, R. S. Burns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

274 Scopus citations

Abstract

Sixty-nine postoperative patients indicated the severity of their pain using eight measures designed to assess pain intensity and two designed to measure pain affect. The utility and validity of the 10 measures were evaluated according to two criteria: (a) the magnitude of the relationship between each scale and a linear combination of the pain measures, and (b) relative rates of incorrect rsponding. The results indicate that each of the measures of pain intensity is adequately valid. In addition, this sample of patients failed to differentiate pain intensity and pain affect using the present measures, suggesting the need for additional research to explore the validity of the affective measures employed in the study. The 11-point Box Scale (BS-11) of pain intensity demonstrated the strongest relationship to a linear combination of all of the measures employed and was responded to correctly by each subject in the sample. All else being equal, these results suggest that the BS-1 scale may be the most useful clinical index of pain intensity among postoperative patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-159
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Journal of Pain
Volume5
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 1989

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The subjective experience of acute pain. An assessment of the utility of 10 indices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., O'Riordan, E. F., Bland, F., & Burns, R. S. (1989). The subjective experience of acute pain. An assessment of the utility of 10 indices. Clinical Journal of Pain, 5(2), 153-159.