The Student Risk Screening Scale: Exploring Dimensionality and Differential Item Functioning

Christopher Schatschneider, Kathleen Lynne Lane, Wendy Oakes, Jemma Robertson Kalberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Screening of students at risk for antisocial behaviors in school is an essential step in the implementation of evidence-based supports for academic, behavioral, and social domains at the first sign of concern. This study examined the measurement properties of a free-access systematic behavior screening tool: the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Ratings on 7,264 students from elementary to high school were subjected to a series of graded response models. Results indicated this scale is sensitive in average and above-average ranges of the distribution of behavior problems. Statistical tests for the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) indicated that all 7 items showed DIF across age, gender, and presence/absence of a special education designation. However, effect size indices for DIF revealed the size of differences found across groups to be, with few exceptions, trivial. Results demonstrate the importance of computing effect size indices when estimating DIF in large-sample studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-203
Number of pages19
JournalEducational Assessment
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

student
statistical test
special education
school
rating
gender
evidence
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

The Student Risk Screening Scale : Exploring Dimensionality and Differential Item Functioning. / Schatschneider, Christopher; Lane, Kathleen Lynne; Oakes, Wendy; Kalberg, Jemma Robertson.

In: Educational Assessment, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2014, p. 185-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schatschneider, Christopher ; Lane, Kathleen Lynne ; Oakes, Wendy ; Kalberg, Jemma Robertson. / The Student Risk Screening Scale : Exploring Dimensionality and Differential Item Functioning. In: Educational Assessment. 2014 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 185-203.
@article{dfca089adf834421b001d49127271757,
title = "The Student Risk Screening Scale: Exploring Dimensionality and Differential Item Functioning",
abstract = "Screening of students at risk for antisocial behaviors in school is an essential step in the implementation of evidence-based supports for academic, behavioral, and social domains at the first sign of concern. This study examined the measurement properties of a free-access systematic behavior screening tool: the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Ratings on 7,264 students from elementary to high school were subjected to a series of graded response models. Results indicated this scale is sensitive in average and above-average ranges of the distribution of behavior problems. Statistical tests for the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) indicated that all 7 items showed DIF across age, gender, and presence/absence of a special education designation. However, effect size indices for DIF revealed the size of differences found across groups to be, with few exceptions, trivial. Results demonstrate the importance of computing effect size indices when estimating DIF in large-sample studies.",
author = "Christopher Schatschneider and Lane, {Kathleen Lynne} and Wendy Oakes and Kalberg, {Jemma Robertson}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/10627197.2014.934608",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "185--203",
journal = "Educational Assessment",
issn = "1062-7197",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Student Risk Screening Scale

T2 - Exploring Dimensionality and Differential Item Functioning

AU - Schatschneider, Christopher

AU - Lane, Kathleen Lynne

AU - Oakes, Wendy

AU - Kalberg, Jemma Robertson

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Screening of students at risk for antisocial behaviors in school is an essential step in the implementation of evidence-based supports for academic, behavioral, and social domains at the first sign of concern. This study examined the measurement properties of a free-access systematic behavior screening tool: the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Ratings on 7,264 students from elementary to high school were subjected to a series of graded response models. Results indicated this scale is sensitive in average and above-average ranges of the distribution of behavior problems. Statistical tests for the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) indicated that all 7 items showed DIF across age, gender, and presence/absence of a special education designation. However, effect size indices for DIF revealed the size of differences found across groups to be, with few exceptions, trivial. Results demonstrate the importance of computing effect size indices when estimating DIF in large-sample studies.

AB - Screening of students at risk for antisocial behaviors in school is an essential step in the implementation of evidence-based supports for academic, behavioral, and social domains at the first sign of concern. This study examined the measurement properties of a free-access systematic behavior screening tool: the Student Risk Screening Scale (Drummond, 1994). Ratings on 7,264 students from elementary to high school were subjected to a series of graded response models. Results indicated this scale is sensitive in average and above-average ranges of the distribution of behavior problems. Statistical tests for the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) indicated that all 7 items showed DIF across age, gender, and presence/absence of a special education designation. However, effect size indices for DIF revealed the size of differences found across groups to be, with few exceptions, trivial. Results demonstrate the importance of computing effect size indices when estimating DIF in large-sample studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906093623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906093623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10627197.2014.934608

DO - 10.1080/10627197.2014.934608

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84906093623

VL - 19

SP - 185

EP - 203

JO - Educational Assessment

JF - Educational Assessment

SN - 1062-7197

IS - 3

ER -