The structure of belief systems among contending era activists

Carol Mueller; Thomas Dimieri

doi:10.1093/sf/60.3.657

The structure of belief systems among contending era activists

Carol Mueller, Thomas Dimieri

Arizona State University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

The structures of beliefs on feminist policy preferences are compared for activists who led campaigns supporting and opposing a Massachusetts referendum on equal rights for women (ERA) in 1976. Beliefs of opposing activists demonstrate asymmetric structures. The preferences for feminist policies of ERA proponents show significantly greater constraint, consensus, and position extremity than do those of ERA opponents. These findings are explained in terms of differences in the group processes among activists within social movements that assert new claims and responsibilities compared with those that defend old rights and privileges.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	657-675
Number of pages	19
Journal	Social Forces
Volume	60
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/60.3.657
State	Published - Mar 1982

ASJC Scopus subject areas

History
Anthropology
Sociology and Political Science

Access to Document

10.1093/sf/60.3.657

Cite this

@article{428fcc4f1c584b73b281e2ce30ef17cf,

title = "The structure of belief systems among contending era activists",

abstract = "The structures of beliefs on feminist policy preferences are compared for activists who led campaigns supporting and opposing a Massachusetts referendum on equal rights for women (ERA) in 1976. Beliefs of opposing activists demonstrate asymmetric structures. The preferences for feminist policies of ERA proponents show significantly greater constraint, consensus, and position extremity than do those of ERA opponents. These findings are explained in terms of differences in the group processes among activists within social movements that assert new claims and responsibilities compared with those that defend old rights and privileges.",

author = "Carol Mueller and Thomas Dimieri",

note = "Funding Information: Sociological Association, 1980. Preparation of the paper was made possible by a postdoctoral grant, #1F32 MHO7811-01 from the National Institute of Mental Health to the first author. Data collection and analysis were funded by a faculty grant to both authors from Wellesley College and continued support from its Center for Research on Women and the Wellesley College Computer Center. We thank Henry Noerenberg, our collaborator on the Massachusetts state survey, and Andrea Levere, who conducted most of the interviews with Massachusetts activists. We have benefited from the comments of Myra Ferree, Charles Judd, Robert Mitchell, Tahi Mottl, and Frances Fox Piven.",

year = "1982",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1093/sf/60.3.657",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "60",

pages = "657--675",

journal = "Social Forces",

issn = "0037-7732",

publisher = "University of North Carolina Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The structure of belief systems among contending era activists

AU - Mueller, Carol

AU - Dimieri, Thomas

N1 - Funding Information: Sociological Association, 1980. Preparation of the paper was made possible by a postdoctoral grant, #1F32 MHO7811-01 from the National Institute of Mental Health to the first author. Data collection and analysis were funded by a faculty grant to both authors from Wellesley College and continued support from its Center for Research on Women and the Wellesley College Computer Center. We thank Henry Noerenberg, our collaborator on the Massachusetts state survey, and Andrea Levere, who conducted most of the interviews with Massachusetts activists. We have benefited from the comments of Myra Ferree, Charles Judd, Robert Mitchell, Tahi Mottl, and Frances Fox Piven.

PY - 1982/3

Y1 - 1982/3

N2 - The structures of beliefs on feminist policy preferences are compared for activists who led campaigns supporting and opposing a Massachusetts referendum on equal rights for women (ERA) in 1976. Beliefs of opposing activists demonstrate asymmetric structures. The preferences for feminist policies of ERA proponents show significantly greater constraint, consensus, and position extremity than do those of ERA opponents. These findings are explained in terms of differences in the group processes among activists within social movements that assert new claims and responsibilities compared with those that defend old rights and privileges.

AB - The structures of beliefs on feminist policy preferences are compared for activists who led campaigns supporting and opposing a Massachusetts referendum on equal rights for women (ERA) in 1976. Beliefs of opposing activists demonstrate asymmetric structures. The preferences for feminist policies of ERA proponents show significantly greater constraint, consensus, and position extremity than do those of ERA opponents. These findings are explained in terms of differences in the group processes among activists within social movements that assert new claims and responsibilities compared with those that defend old rights and privileges.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019913269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019913269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/sf/60.3.657

DO - 10.1093/sf/60.3.657

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0019913269

VL - 60

SP - 657

EP - 675

JO - Social Forces

JF - Social Forces

SN - 0037-7732

IS - 3

ER -

The structure of belief systems among contending era activists

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this