The Stoic explanation of the origin of vice

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The Stoics thought that once human beings become rational, they immediately form false beliefs about what is good and what is bad. There are no exceptions. Even the sage once had false beliefs about the value of things. The dispute among the Stoics was not about whether this happens, but was about how to explain the reasoning that results in these beliefs. The primary evidence for this dispute is Galen's discussion in On the Doctrines of Plato and Hippocrates. On the basis of this discussion and certain assumptions about how the Stoics understood impulses in the psychology of children and adults, I set out an interpretation of (i) Chrysippus' explanation of what happens at the onset of reason when human beings form false beliefs about what is good and what is bad, (ii) Posidonius' criticism of this explanation of the origin of vice, and (iii) the explanation that Posidonius himself thought was correct.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)121-140
Number of pages20
JournalMethexis
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Stoics
False Belief
Human Being
Dispute
Criticism
Doctrine
Chrysippus
Plato
Hippocrates
Psychology
Onset
Impulse

Keywords

  • Chrysippus
  • Galen
  • Posidonius
  • Vice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

The Stoic explanation of the origin of vice. / Blackson, Thomas.

In: Methexis, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2017, p. 121-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Blackson, Thomas. / The Stoic explanation of the origin of vice. In: Methexis. 2017 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 121-140.
@article{f9db2fe68a274a7583c4902774d9da4d,
title = "The Stoic explanation of the origin of vice",
abstract = "The Stoics thought that once human beings become rational, they immediately form false beliefs about what is good and what is bad. There are no exceptions. Even the sage once had false beliefs about the value of things. The dispute among the Stoics was not about whether this happens, but was about how to explain the reasoning that results in these beliefs. The primary evidence for this dispute is Galen's discussion in On the Doctrines of Plato and Hippocrates. On the basis of this discussion and certain assumptions about how the Stoics understood impulses in the psychology of children and adults, I set out an interpretation of (i) Chrysippus' explanation of what happens at the onset of reason when human beings form false beliefs about what is good and what is bad, (ii) Posidonius' criticism of this explanation of the origin of vice, and (iii) the explanation that Posidonius himself thought was correct.",
keywords = "Chrysippus, Galen, Posidonius, Vice",
author = "Thomas Blackson",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1163/24680974-02901007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "121--140",
journal = "Methexis",
issn = "0327-0289",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Stoic explanation of the origin of vice

AU - Blackson, Thomas

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The Stoics thought that once human beings become rational, they immediately form false beliefs about what is good and what is bad. There are no exceptions. Even the sage once had false beliefs about the value of things. The dispute among the Stoics was not about whether this happens, but was about how to explain the reasoning that results in these beliefs. The primary evidence for this dispute is Galen's discussion in On the Doctrines of Plato and Hippocrates. On the basis of this discussion and certain assumptions about how the Stoics understood impulses in the psychology of children and adults, I set out an interpretation of (i) Chrysippus' explanation of what happens at the onset of reason when human beings form false beliefs about what is good and what is bad, (ii) Posidonius' criticism of this explanation of the origin of vice, and (iii) the explanation that Posidonius himself thought was correct.

AB - The Stoics thought that once human beings become rational, they immediately form false beliefs about what is good and what is bad. There are no exceptions. Even the sage once had false beliefs about the value of things. The dispute among the Stoics was not about whether this happens, but was about how to explain the reasoning that results in these beliefs. The primary evidence for this dispute is Galen's discussion in On the Doctrines of Plato and Hippocrates. On the basis of this discussion and certain assumptions about how the Stoics understood impulses in the psychology of children and adults, I set out an interpretation of (i) Chrysippus' explanation of what happens at the onset of reason when human beings form false beliefs about what is good and what is bad, (ii) Posidonius' criticism of this explanation of the origin of vice, and (iii) the explanation that Posidonius himself thought was correct.

KW - Chrysippus

KW - Galen

KW - Posidonius

KW - Vice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015616810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015616810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/24680974-02901007

DO - 10.1163/24680974-02901007

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85015616810

VL - 29

SP - 121

EP - 140

JO - Methexis

JF - Methexis

SN - 0327-0289

IS - 1

ER -